Developers are increasingly using "rollup" or "Layer Two" solutions to create new Web3 applications. The primary objective is to leverage the parent network's robust economic security, utilizing its substantial validator pool and security guarantees. The Web3 Foundation's Technical Education team has experimented with it with EduChain, which serves as a live demonstration network.Developers are increasingly using "rollup" or "Layer Two" solutions to create new Web3 applications. The primary objective is to leverage the parent network's robust economic security, utilizing its substantial validator pool and security guarantees. The Web3 Foundation's Technical Education team has experimented with it with EduChain, which serves as a live demonstration network.

Not Every Web3 Protocol Needs a Native Token

2025/12/11 06:52

When developing a new protocol, the default assumption is nearly always that a new native token must follow. Most blockchains and Web3 frameworks rely on cryptoeconomic systems comprising incentives and penalties to maintain protocol security and deter malicious actors.

\ However, deploying a new Web3 application as a "rollup" or "Layer Two" solution has been common in recent years. Whether implemented as a rollup on Ethereum, a parachain on Polkadot, or a subnet on Avalanche, the primary objective is to leverage the parent network's robust economic security, utilizing its substantial validator pool and security guarantees.

The Obstacles: Justification for a Separate Token

Currently, the technical challenge of building a blockchain has been significantly mitigated through the availability of numerous SDKs and frameworks. Tools such as the Polkadot SDK and Cosmos SDK allow developers to utilize templates and rapidly launch a functional network, complete with all the standard features one would expect from any standard Web3 protocol.

\ Despite these advancements, a major barrier remains: identity, namely, ensuring we have some semblance of sybil resistance.

\ ==We still need a way to ensure bad actors can’t utterly spam or harm our network, which is most of the main reasons why economic aspects of cryptoeconomic systems like Proof of Work or Proof of Stake exist.==

\ Tokenomics then becomes a subsequent concern: if a project's token model is flawed or poorly conceived, it can undermine the entire effort, regardless of the quality of the underlying technology.

\ The necessity of designing and securing an entirely separate cryptoeconomic network presents a considerable hurdle for developers and startups whose core mission is building a superior, more resilient application or infrastructure, not managing a monetary policy.

\ Fortunately, the landscape is evolving, providing a solution to this complexity.

The Solution: Utilizing the “Parent” Network's Token

If a new protocol builds upon an existing network and deploys as a rollup/Layer Two, they (should) inherently, well, inherit their security from the parent network.

\ This raises a critical question: why not simply use the parent network's native token for all operations? Everything is already set up; we just need to make sure that we can safely perform checks and balances when transferring to and from the parent network. ==In the future, it might be possible to launch a rollup without a token at all, if we solve the Sybil problem, and assuming we have a parent network that provides security for our rollup/service.==

\ Polkadot permits the launch of a “tokenless” parachain. The parachain can instead use the Layer One's token (such as DOT on Polkadot) to facilitate all operations, including transaction fees and security mechanisms.

\ This approach frees up the team to concentrate on ==building solutions and core application logic==. In other words, you focus more on getting your protocol running so you can build your resilient application/infrastructure rather than being bogged down by token mechanics.

A Live Example: EduChain

This concept is not merely theoretical. The Web3 Foundation's Technical Education team (of which I am a part of!) has experimented with it with EduChain, which serves as a live demonstration of this tokenless configuration. It utilizes the parent network’s token, specifically the PAS token on the Paseo testnet, as its functional currency.

\ The EduChain configuration operates via a reserve-backed transfer using XCM, which functions as follows:

\

  • Zero initial supply: the chain commences with a zero total supply of its own potential token. To fund a network account, a cross-chain transfer via XCM must be initiated from the parent network (Paseo).

  • The reserve and the sovereign account: The parachain designates a system parachain (such as the Paseo Asset Hub) as a reserve for the parent token (PAS). Upon the parachain's creation, a specialized account, known as a sovereign account, is automatically generated on the parent chain exclusively for the parachain.

  • Transferring PAS:

  • When a user sends PAS from their account on the parent chain (Paseo) to the parachain (EduChain), the PAS is deposited into the parachain's sovereign account on the parent chain, where it functions as the reserve.

  • Simultaneously, a new, local asset representing PAS is minted on the parachain and credited to the user's account there.

  • When a user sends this local asset back to the parent chain, the local asset is burned on the parachain, and the corresponding PAS amount is unlocked and transferred from the sovereign account back to the beneficiary's account on the parent chain.

    \

This XCM mechanism ensures that every unit of PAS on the parachain is fully backed 1:1 by actual PAS held in a secure reserve on the parent network, thereby eliminating the necessity for a distinct, project-specific token.

\ As a general note, a parachain controls its own local representation of an asset and could, in principle, change those balances according to its own governance. However, Asset Hub — as the reserve location — maintains the canonical reserve‑backed accounting for that asset across the network, and parachains are expected to use XCM instructions via Asset Hub so that this accounting remains correct and consistent.

\ For comprehensive details on EduChain and its operational mechanics, documentation is available at: https://web3educhain.xyz/

Conclusion

This article aimed to highlight the significant potential of delegating the economic and security concerns of a rollup or Layer Two to the parent network itself. By employing reserve-backed XCM transfers, a project can completely circumvent the substantial difficulties associated with launching a new Web3 protocol, allowing the team to dedicate its full effort to building a superior application and addressing real-world problems.

\ Individuals interested in implementing this solution can explore launching a parachain on Paseo, as well as the EduChain repo for more information:

\

  • Parachain Zero To Hero Tutorials
  • Web3 Educhain

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

a16z Opens First Asia Office: Park From Naver and Monad to Lead

a16z Opens First Asia Office: Park From Naver and Monad to Lead

The post a16z Opens First Asia Office: Park From Naver and Monad to Lead appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. a16z crypto, the crypto-focused venture arm of Andreessen Horowitz, has officially entered the Asian market with the opening of its first regional office in Seoul, South Korea. The Silicon Valley-based venture fund appointed Sungmo Park as Head of APAC go-to-market to lead the Seoul operations. Park brings extensive regional expertise from his previous roles at Monad Foundation and Polygon Labs. Sponsored Sponsored Asia Emerges as Global Crypto Powerhouse Chief Operating Officer Anthony Albanese made the announcement. The decision to establish a physical presence in Asia reflects the region’s growing dominance in global crypto adoption. Chainalysis reports that Asia-Pacific accounted for $2.36 trillion in on-chain value over the 12 months to June 2025. This figure represents a 69% increase from $1.4 trillion in the previous year. South Korea stands as the world’s second-largest crypto market, with nearly one in three adults holding digital assets—a rate that surpasses stock ownership. Japan has seen on-chain activity surge 120% over the past year. Singapore has one of the highest crypto ownership rates in the world. About 40% of Gen Z and Millennials in the country invest in digital assets. India leads the Chainalysis Global Crypto Adoption Index, driven by mobile-first technology adoption and limited access to traditional banking. Notably, 11 of the top 20 countries in Chainalysis’s Global Crypto Adoption Index are located in Asia. Excited to announce that @a16zcrypto is expanding into Asia and opening our first office in Seoul, South Korea. As part of this, we’re thrilled to have @sungmo_apac16z join our team as Head of APAC go-to-market to lead the Seoul office and start building our presence in the… pic.twitter.com/KBljioBCqx — Anthony Albanese (@AAlbaneseNY) December 10, 2025 The Seoul launch follows other leading venture and crypto firms boosting their Asian presence. Competition for deals, talent, and growth is intensifying as the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 10:34