After weeks of what had been tightly buttoned talks between the parties, Senate Democrats have delivered their latest counteroffer on the crypto market structure bill, outlining a set of demands resembling those they first laid out in a public memo in September and potentially revealing the true depth of the divide inside the Senate.

The summary shared this week and circulated online earlier Wednesday shows Democrats have accepted much of the Republicans' proposed framework. Yet they are insisting on significant structural changes that touch financial stability, market integrity, national security enforcement and the political conduct of public officials — mostly pointed at President Donald Trump.

The Democratic documents, confirmed by people familiar with the talks, were offered to "reach an agreement and proceed towards a mark-up" on a bipartisan bill.

The document helps explain why senior Democrats are rejecting the push for a markup next week, despite repeated public assurances from GOP negotiators that the bill is nearly ready.

Their position centers on several unresolved fronts: stronger disclosure and secondary-market protections for digital assets, updated tools to identify and deter illicit finance, rules to prevent platforms from bypassing compliance obligations by claiming decentralization, and strict limits on stablecoin yield that reflect long-standing fears about deposit flight from community banks.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle also remain divided over how to split long-term oversight between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission, leaving the bill’s core regulatory architecture unsettled. Democrats in the Senate Agriculture Committee had previously included a provision calling for bipartisan commissioners to be confirmed to these agencies in that committee's earlier draft bill.

Democrats are also pushing for firm ethics rules to stop elected officials from issuing or profiting from crypto projects, a demand sharpened by Trump family ventures that have fueled accusations that digital assets have become Washington’s newest Swamp Asset.

However, one of the leading negotiators — Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis, the chairwoman of the digital assets subcommittee that's part of the Senate Banking Committee — revealed on Tuesday that the White House was already shooting down ethics provisions and demands for Democratic nominees for the federal commissions that will regulate the space. Trump and his officials have insisted there's nothing wrong with his personal business ties to the crypto sector as his administration seeks to set its policies.

The reason some of the lawmakers and lobbyists seem to be getting more frantic about the negotiations is that they have a handful of days left in the 2025 Senate calendar, which ends next week. Slipping into January puts the process on a slide toward the political stresses of the midterm elections and the expiring Continuing Resolution that is currently funding the government and expires on Jan. 30, 2026 — a government shutdown may further delay any progress, as 2025's record-breaking shutdown did.

The House of Representatives already passed a market structure bill earlier this year, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, and its members still routinely push for the Senate to just take up their bill and do some edits, rather than crafting its own legislation. But while much of the Clarity Act is echoed in the previous drafts of the Senate's work, it's still developing a bespoke version.

As lawmakers continue to hash it out, progressive groups and unions have been circling, criticizing the current effort as a potential threat to U.S. financial stability and dangerous for retirees relying on steady pensions. They join the steady pushback of Senator Elizabeth Warren and like-minded lawmakers, the Democrats who have long criticized the rise of the crypto sector. Though Warren has been sidelined by many in her party who are negotiating directly with Republicans, she remains the ranking Democrat on the Banking Committee, one of the two panels that needs to pass the bill.