PANews reported on December 13th that, according to Cointelegraph, in response to Citadel's letter to the SEC earlier this month urging the SEC not to grant broadPANews reported on December 13th that, according to Cointelegraph, in response to Citadel's letter to the SEC earlier this month urging the SEC not to grant broad

Citadel urged the SEC to tighten regulations on tokenized stocks on DeFi platforms, drawing criticism from crypto lobbying groups.

2025/12/13 14:35

PANews reported on December 13th that, according to Cointelegraph, in response to Citadel's letter to the SEC earlier this month urging the SEC not to grant broad exemptions to DeFi platforms that would prohibit them from trading tokenized U.S. stocks, arguing that these platforms would likely be defined as "exchanges" or "brokerage firms" regulated under securities laws, Andreessen Horowitz, the Uniswap Foundation, and cryptocurrency lobbying groups such as the DeFi Education Foundation and the Digital Chamber of Commerce have sent a letter to the SEC opposing Citadel Securities' request for the SEC to tighten regulations on tokenized stocks in the DeFi sector.

“Citadel’s letter is based on a flawed analysis of securities law and attempts to extend SEC registration requirements to any entity with even the most indirect connection to DeFi transactions.” Furthermore, while acknowledging Citadel’s goals of protecting investors and maintaining market integrity, they disagree that “achieving these goals always requires registration as a traditional U.S. SEC intermediary, and in some cases, a well-designed on-chain market cannot fulfill these goals.” The letter also criticizes Citadel’s definition of autonomous software as an intermediary, arguing that autonomous software cannot be a “middleman” in financial transactions because it “is not a person capable of independently exercising discretion or judgment.”

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09