The post Ethereum Co-Founder Suggests Blockchain and ZK-Proofs for Fairer X Algorithms appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin proposes using blockchainThe post Ethereum Co-Founder Suggests Blockchain and ZK-Proofs for Fairer X Algorithms appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin proposes using blockchain

Ethereum Co-Founder Suggests Blockchain and ZK-Proofs for Fairer X Algorithms

  • Blockchain timestamps for all content, likes, and retweets to prevent server-side manipulation or censorship.

  • ZK-proofs enable verifiable fairness in algorithmic decisions without exposing underlying data.

  • Platform commits to releasing full algorithm code after a 1-2 year delay, promoting long-term trust; European Commission data shows non-compliance fines exceeding 120 million euros for transparency failures.

Vitalik Buterin urges blockchain for fair X content ranking using ZK-proofs. Discover how crypto can enhance social media transparency and combat censorship—explore the full proposal now.

What is Vitalik Buterin’s Proposal for Blockchain in Social Media Content Ranking?

Vitalik Buterin’s blockchain proposal for social media focuses on integrating zero-knowledge proofs and blockchain technology to create a verifiable, censorship-resistant content-ranking system on platforms like X. In a recent post, the Ethereum co-founder highlighted the need for transparency in algorithms that determine content visibility, arguing that current systems under Elon Musk’s leadership risk amplifying hate while undermining free speech. By using ZK-proofs, platforms could demonstrate adherence to fairness rules without disclosing proprietary details, fostering greater user trust.

How Do Zero-Knowledge Proofs Ensure Algorithmic Fairness?

Zero-knowledge proofs, a cornerstone of advanced cryptography, allow one party to prove the validity of a statement without revealing underlying information. In Buterin’s vision, ZK-proofs would verify that X’s content-ranking algorithm follows predefined fairness constraints, such as equal treatment of viewpoints or avoidance of bias amplification. For example, the proof could confirm that decisions prioritize educational content without favoring specific ideologies, all while keeping the algorithm’s inner workings private initially.

Ethereum Foundation AI lead Davide Crapis echoed this by emphasizing the need for disclosed optimization targets that users can understand and adjust. Supporting data from blockchain implementations, like Ethereum’s layer-2 solutions, shows ZK-proofs scaling efficiently for high-volume verifications—handling millions of transactions with minimal computational overhead. Experts note that without such mechanisms, platforms face accusations of opacity, as seen in the European Union’s Digital Services Act enforcement, which mandates algorithmic transparency to mitigate risks to civic discourse.

Buterin’s suggestion extends to on-chain timestamping of all interactions—posts, likes, and retweets—to eliminate server-side alterations. This would make censorship attempts detectable, as any tampering would contradict the immutable blockchain record. A 1-2 year delay in publishing the full algorithm code balances innovation protection with eventual accountability, drawing from open-source practices in crypto where delayed disclosures have built community confidence.


Source: Vitalik Buterin

In his post, Buterin critiqued X’s evolution into a tool for “coordinated hate sessions,” urging a shift toward verifiable integrity. This aligns with broader crypto principles of decentralization, where trust is earned through code, not centralized authority.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are the Risks of Opaque Content-Ranking Algorithms on Platforms Like X?

Opaque algorithms on X can amplify misinformation and bias, potentially harming free speech by favoring certain viewpoints. Buterin’s proposal counters this with ZK-proofs, ensuring decisions are verifiable; research from 2024 indicates social media access correlates with increased misinformation belief, underscoring the need for transparency to protect democratic processes.

How Can Blockchain Integration Improve Social Media Transparency for Users?

Blockchain integration timestamps content and interactions immutably, making manipulation evident to anyone. As Buterin suggests, combining this with ZK-proofs allows platforms to prove fairness naturally, much like verifying age without sharing personal data. This empowers users to trust the system, reducing concerns over censorship while maintaining platform efficiency.

Key Takeaways

  • Verifiable Fairness: ZK-proofs enable proof of algorithmic integrity without data exposure, building trust in content ranking.
  • Censorship Resistance: On-chain timestamps prevent tampering, ensuring authentic reach for posts and interactions.
  • Regulatory Alignment: Delayed code publication supports compliance with laws like the EU’s Digital Services Act, avoiding fines for opacity.

Conclusion

Vitalik Buterin’s blockchain proposal for social media content ranking, leveraging ZK-proofs and on-chain verification, addresses critical transparency gaps on platforms like X. By mitigating risks of bias and censorship, this approach could redefine trust in digital discourse, aligning with crypto’s decentralized ethos. As social media’s societal impact grows—evidenced by studies linking it to mental health and misinformation effects—adopting such innovations may become essential for fostering healthier online environments. Stay informed on evolving crypto applications in tech for forward-thinking strategies.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is advocating for the integration of cryptographic tools into social media to enhance algorithmic transparency. He specifically targets X’s content-ranking system, proposing blockchain-based timestamping and zero-knowledge proofs to verify fairness without compromising sensitive information.

Buterin’s concerns stem from perceived inconsistencies in X’s free speech stance under Elon Musk. He described the platform’s trajectory as detrimental, turning a beacon of open expression into a conduit for targeted negativity. Davide Crapis from the Ethereum Foundation supported this by calling for user-legible algorithm targets that can be customized.

The proposal includes committing to a delayed release of the full algorithm code, allowing time for updates while ensuring eventual public scrutiny. ZK-proofs would mathematically attest to compliance with fairness rules, a method already proven in blockchain scalability solutions.

This idea resonates with decentralized social media efforts, or SocialFi, which prioritize user control over centralized moderation. Despite limited mainstream adoption, traditional platforms show wariness—Meta has restricted links to competitors like Pixelfed, labeling them as spam.

The crypto community’s skepticism toward centralized power is well-founded. Musk’s January announcement to prioritize educational content drew criticism for potential viewpoint suppression. Buterin previously advised against banning users for differing opinions, reinforcing his free speech advocacy.

Social media’s influence on society is profound. A 2024 study linked Facebook usage to heightened misinformation beliefs, while internal Meta research revealed reduced depression and anxiety among users pausing the platform for a week. Reuters reported these findings were suppressed, highlighting ethical lapses.

The EU’s Digital Services Act enforces algorithmic disclosure and risk assessments for civic and security impacts. It also grants researchers data access, a provision X violated, leading to a 120 million euro fine. Additional penalties addressed ad transparency and misleading verification badges, where payment alone grants “verified” status without checks.

Buterin’s vision could inspire broader reforms, blending crypto’s verifiability with social platforms’ scale. As decentralized alternatives gain traction, centralized giants may need to adapt to maintain relevance in an era prioritizing transparency and user empowerment.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/ethereum-co-founder-suggests-blockchain-and-zk-proofs-for-fairer-x-algorithms

Market Opportunity
ZKsync Logo
ZKsync Price(ZK)
$0.01982
$0.01982$0.01982
+0.60%
USD
ZKsync (ZK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

SM Offices investing P1B in Cebu expansion

SM Offices investing P1B in Cebu expansion

SM OFFICES, the commercial property arm of SM Prime Holdings, Inc., plans to add more than 60,000 square meters (sq.m.) of new leasable space worth about P1 billion
Share
Bworldonline2026/02/20 00:06
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Meme Coin Frenzy Cools, Altcoins Take the Spotlight

Meme Coin Frenzy Cools, Altcoins Take the Spotlight

Pump.fun’s flagship coin PUMP dropped nearly 10% in a single day, dragging down related tokens such as TROLL and Aura, […] The post Meme Coin Frenzy Cools, Altcoins Take the Spotlight appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/20 00:00