Ecommerce brands rarely struggle with a lack of data, but what to do with it all as they grow and complexity creeps into their workflows. Cary Lawrence, CEO of Ecommerce brands rarely struggle with a lack of data, but what to do with it all as they grow and complexity creeps into their workflows. Cary Lawrence, CEO of

Decile’s Luma AI takes on ecommerce’s biggest analytics problem

2025/12/16 06:53
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Ecommerce brands rarely struggle with a lack of data, but what to do with it all as they grow and complexity creeps into their workflows.

Cary Lawrence, CEO of Decile, says the issue becomes clear once brands move beyond early-stage reporting. Native dashboards inside ecommerce and marketing platforms work at first, but each tool only tells part of the story.

“As a brand starts to grow and their ecommerce stack evolves, the native dashboards don’t cut it anymore. Each tool provides a set of reports from their perspective, but there’s a gap between them,” Lawrence explains. “There is an inherent need to translate and stitch the data. Teams spend hours downloading and stitching together reports from various platforms, but even then the results often don’t show the why.”

Marketing teams often try to close those gaps manually, exporting data and assembling reports that still fail to explain what changed or which actions mattered. Context disappears when metrics live in isolation, leaving teams with outcomes but little insight into customer behavior.

Why Decile built Luma differently

The rise of AI promised to simplify analytics, and many ecommerce teams have started experimenting with general-purpose AI tools to summarize reports or query exported data. Results often fall short and lack the depth teams need to act with confidence.

Lawrence says the gap comes down to how ecommerce data actually works. “The questions that sophisticated brands are asking are much more nuanced,” she explains. “While the use cases are simple, the technical elements are complex.”

Generic AI models struggle with that complexity because ecommerce data carries meaning that changes by brand, channel, and vertical. Order behavior, returns, discounting, subscriptions, and lifecycle metrics do not follow a single set of rules. Without domain-specific grounding, AI has difficulty producing reliable answers.

Decile took a different approach when building Luma AI. Instead of adapting a general AI solution, the company built Luma on a proprietary ecommerce data model shaped by years of direct experience working with brands.

“We didn’t start totally from scratch,” Lawrence says. “We provided our proprietary ecommerce expertise, informed by more than five years of work with ecommerce brands, as additional context for the enterprise-grade LLMs we’re using for Luma. Since Decile already had data warehoused in Snowflake, we were able to leverage Snowflake’s Cortex stack to enable the technical components.”

Together, the data foundation and ecommerce-specific context allowed Decile to build an analytics agent designed around how ecommerce businesses actually operate. Rather than treating metrics as generic data points, Luma evaluates them in context, translating questions into analysis grounded in each brand’s structure and customer behavior.

Why transparency changed how teams trusted AI

Trust remains one of the biggest barriers to adopting AI-driven analytics. Teams hesitate to act on insights they cannot validate and confidence erodes quickly when recommendations arrive without explanation.

Luma addressed this directly by making its reasoning visible. Users can see how insights were generated and which data informed them.

“Including the ‘thinking’ portion of Luma ended up having a huge impact on our client’s trust and the legitimization of Luma AI,” Lawrence says. “We had no idea how powerful this functionality was going to be until we kept hearing this theme come up over and over again from our initial private preview clients. Understanding the ‘how’ for the insights and recommendations coming from Luma was super powerful, regardless of whether the user was a marketer or an analyst.”

Seeing the reasoning behind each insight removed hesitation across teams. Marketers stopped second-guessing results, and analysts gained clarity into how conclusions were formed. Transparency played a key role in building trust around AI-driven analysis.

How AI analysts will shape future ecommerce teams

Looking ahead, Lawrence expects AI analysts to change how ecommerce organizations operate. Rather than limiting analysis to a business intelligence team, future organizations will treat data fluency as a shared capability.

Broad access to trusted insights allows teams to move faster without adding technical headcount. Decision-making shifts closer to the work itself, removing the friction that once came from exporting data, reconciling reports, or waiting on specialized resources. First-party customer data becomes the strategic advantage teams rely on day to day.

For Lawrence, the goal remains straightforward. Analytics should support action, not slow it down. When insights become accessible and trusted, data finally works the way ecommerce teams have long expected it to.

Comments
Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

The post Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 17 September 2025 | 20:13 The meme coin market is heating up once again as traders look for the next breakout token. While Shiba Inu (SHIB) continues to build its ecosystem and PEPE holds onto its viral roots, a new contender, Layer Brett (LBRETT), is gaining attention after raising more than $3.7 million in its presale. With a live staking system, fast-growing community, and real tech backing, some analysts are already calling it “the next PEPE.” Here’s the latest on the Shiba Inu price forecast, what’s going on with PEPE, and why Layer Brett is drawing in new investors fast. Shiba Inu price forecast: Ecosystem builds, but retail looks elsewhere Shiba Inu (SHIB) continues to develop its broader ecosystem with Shibarium, the project’s Layer 2 network built to improve speed and lower gas fees. While the community remains strong, the price hasn’t followed suit lately. SHIB is currently trading around $0.00001298, and while that’s a decent jump from its earlier lows, it still falls short of triggering any major excitement across the market. The project includes additional tokens like BONE and LEASH, and also has ongoing initiatives in DeFi and NFTs. However, even with all this development, many investors feel the hype that once surrounded SHIB has shifted elsewhere, particularly toward newer, more dynamic meme coins offering better entry points and incentives. PEPE: Can it rebound or is the momentum gone? PEPE saw a parabolic rise during the last meme coin surge, catching fire on social media and delivering massive short-term gains for early adopters. However, like most meme tokens driven largely by hype, it has since cooled off. PEPE is currently trading around $0.00001076, down significantly from its peak. While the token still enjoys a loyal community, analysts believe its best days may be behind it unless…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:50
USD/JPY Intervention: How Verbal Warnings Dramatically Slowed the Japanese Yen’s Slide

USD/JPY Intervention: How Verbal Warnings Dramatically Slowed the Japanese Yen’s Slide

BitcoinWorld USD/JPY Intervention: How Verbal Warnings Dramatically Slowed the Japanese Yen’s Slide TOKYO, March 2025 – Japanese authorities’ carefully calibrated
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/30 23:25
USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

A heated contest for control over a new dollar-pegged token has set the stage for what analysts say could define the next phase of the stablecoin industry. According to Bloomberg, a bidding war unfolded on Hyperliquid, one of crypto’s fastest-growing trading platforms, with the prize being the right to issue USDH, its native stablecoin. The competition drew some of the sector’s most prominent names, including Paxos, Sky, and Ethena, who later withdrew their bid, alongside the lesser-known Native Markets, a startup backed by Stripe stablecoin subsidiary Bridge. Hyperliquid Stablecoin Race Shows Branding and Partnerships Matter as Much as Tech Over the weekend, Hyperliquid’s validators, the contributors who secure the network and vote on key decisions, awarded the USDH contract to Native Markets over the weekend. Despite its relatively new status, the firm’s connection with Stripe helped it outpace more established rivals. Stablecoins underpin decentralized finance by providing a dollar-backed medium for collateral, settlement, and payments across applications. What began as a grassroots, community-led sector has evolved into a battleground for institutions and payment companies seeking revenue from interest on reserves. Circle, for example, shares proceeds from its USDC with Coinbase under a partnership designed to stabilize earnings during market swings. The Hyperliquid contest offered a rare glimpse into just how intense competition has become. Paxos pledged to take no revenue until USDH surpassed $1 billion in circulation. Agora offered to share 100% of net revenue with Hyperliquid, while Ethena put forward 95%. All were outbid by Native Markets, whose ties to Stripe’s $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge and subsequent rollout of the Tempo blockchain positioned it as a strong contender. “Every stablecoin issuer is extremely desperate for supply,” said Zaheer Ebtikar, co-founder of Split Capital. “They are willing to publicly announce how much they are willing to offer. It just shows it’s a very tough business for stablecoin issuers.” While USDC remains dominant on Hyperliquid with more than $5.6 billion in deposits, the arrival of USDH could shift flows and revenue dynamics. Paxos co-founder Bhau Kotecha said the firm sees the exchange’s growth as an important opportunity, while Agora’s co-founder Nick van Eck warned that awarding the contract to a vertically integrated issuer risked undermining decentralization. Regulatory positioning also factored into the debate. Paxos operates under a New York trust charter and is seeking a federal license, while Bridge holds money transmitter approvals in 30 states. Native Markets, in a blog post, cited regulatory flexibility and deployment speed as reasons for its selection. Hyperliquid said the strong engagement from its community validated the process. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire dismissed concerns over USDC’s status, noting on X that competition benefits the ecosystem. Analysts suggested that fears of centralization may be exaggerated, noting that Hyperliquid is likely to remain neutral and support multiple stablecoins. Still, the contest over USDH highlighted a new reality for stablecoins: branding, partnerships, and business strategy are becoming as decisive as technology. Native Markets Secures USDH Stablecoin Mandate on Hyperliquid Hyperliquid has concluded its governance vote for the USDH stablecoin, awarding the mandate to Native Markets after a closely watched process that drew weeks of community debate and rival proposals. USDH, described by Hyperliquid as a “Hyperliquid-first, compliant, and natively minted” dollar-backed token, is intended to reduce the platform’s dependence on USDC and strengthen its spot markets. Validators on the decentralized exchange voted in favor of Native Markets, a relatively new player backed by Stripe’s Bridge subsidiary, over established contenders including Paxos and Ethena. The outcome followed a string of proposals offering aggressive revenue-sharing terms to win validator support, underscoring the scale of incentives attached to controlling USDH. Hyperliquid’s exchange has become a critical hub for stablecoin liquidity, with $5.7 billion in USDC, around 8% of its total supply, currently held on the network. At prevailing treasury yields, that translates to an estimated $200 million to $220 million in annual revenue for Circle, underlining why a native alternative could be transformative. Hyperliquid’s validators, who secure the network and vote on key decisions, selected Native Markets following an on-chain governance process that concluded September 15. Native Markets has laid out a phased rollout for USDH, beginning with capped minting and redemption trials before expanding into spot markets. Its reserves will be managed in cash and treasuries by BlackRock, with on-chain tokenization through Superstate and Bridge. Yield from those reserves will be split between Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund and ecosystem development. The launch of USDH comes as Hyperliquid records record profits from perpetual futures trading, with $106 million in revenue in August alone, and prepares to slash spot trading fees by 80% to bolster liquidity. Analysts say the move positions Hyperliquid to capture more of the stablecoin economics internally, marking a significant step in its bid to rival the largest players in decentralized finance
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 00:48