A recently filed federal court complaint in Florida’s Southern District (Case 0:25-cv-62520, dated December 5, 2025) details allegations of a prolonged fraudulentA recently filed federal court complaint in Florida’s Southern District (Case 0:25-cv-62520, dated December 5, 2025) details allegations of a prolonged fraudulent

Federal RICO Lawsuit Accuses Florida-Based Family Office of Running Elaborate Advance-Fee Scam Involving Fake Credit Lines

A recently filed federal court complaint in Florida’s Southern District (Case 0:25-cv-62520, dated December 5, 2025) details allegations of a prolonged fraudulent operation led by Justin Godur and his father, Morris Jaime Godur, through entities like Capital Max Group LLC (formerly Q7Capital Group LLC). Nevada-based investor Kristopher Mullins and his firm KCM Investments LLC claim they were defrauded of close to half a million dollars via promises of massive, exclusive credit facilities that proved nonexistent.

The lawsuit portrays the Godurs as presenting a polished image of a prosperous “family office” with deep roots in real estate and finance. Justin Godur allegedly boasted of his father’s achievements, including founding a major eyewear chain and financing iconic projects in South Florida. This narrative, supported by professional websites for Q7-related companies, helped establish trust when Mullins was introduced to Godur in late 2023 during real estate financing discussions in Las Vegas.

What stands out as particularly alarming are the repeated demands for large upfront payments framed as “due diligence” or application fees for enormous credit lines—classic hallmarks of advance-fee fraud. First, in December 2023, Mullins wired $125,000 for access to a supposed $150 million construction credit line from a European lender, with assurances of personal guarantees from Godur. A month later, another $155,000 followed for a claimed $500 million personal facility.

By early 2024, a third offer emerged: a $100 million line from a U.S.-based source, touted as restricted to elite clients. Mullins paid $150,000 in phased transfers. Godur allegedly stalled inquiries by citing processing delays, while showcasing opulent offices and properties to maintain the illusion of legitimacy, as also mentioned on a public awareness site with the full federal complaint, along with other lawsuits filed against the same defendants https://JustinScottGodurFraud.com.

Other payments raise red flags: $50,000 in June 2024 for nonexistent “lender insurance” required of a fake part-owner; $25,000 in July for a general contractor license that was never secured (with only partial refund); and an unfulfilled $100,000 promise from Godur related to a Las Vegas hotel equity deal, where he reportedly displayed a phony check to a third party.

To prolong the scheme when doubts arose, Godur is accused of deploying tactics like a bogus partnership document in April 2024 and a May 2024 job offer as Chief Marketing Officer at $350,000 annually plus top-tier benefits. Mullins contributed significant marketing work but received minimal pay.

Jaime Godur’s alleged role in quelling concerns in mid-2024—vouching for the European lender’s authenticity and implying questions were unwise—adds a layer of family complicity. Real estate professional AnnaMarie DeFrank, who shares a residence with Justin Godur and served as Capital Max’s real estate director, is implicated in misrepresenting a Deerfield Beach property’s renovation viability, claiming a second-story addition would vastly boost value despite known foundation issues. This led Mullins to sign a purchase agreement, which was allegedly leveraged to persuade other investors, resulting in separate litigation against him.

Critically, in November 2024, Godur reportedly confessed that the $150,000 domestic line payment was never forwarded or applied for. Subsequent repayment pacts—for $445,000 initially, later amended with unpaid wages—were signed with personal guarantees but went unmet, including undepositable checks issued as gestures.

The plaintiffs invoke federal RICO statutes, citing multiple wire transfers as predicate acts of fraud, alongside state claims for inducement, contract breaches, civil theft, and conspiracy. This case emerges amid broader accusations against the Godurs, including separate suits alleging multi-million-dollar thefts, forgeries, and investor deception in other ventures.

As of mid-December 2025, the matter remains in early stages, with allegations unadjudicated. It underscores risks in deals requiring substantial upfront fees for promised lending, especially without verifiable lender involvement.

Multiple Other Lawsuits Accuse Justin Godur and Associates of Multi-Million-Dollar Fraud Schemes

In 2025, at least six attorneys from different law firms have withdrawn, disengaged, or shared concerns of ethical standards, amongst others, from representing Justin Scott Godur in various legal matters. Court records and filings amongst other public information indicate the withdrawals stemmed from irreconcilable differences, ethical concerns, non-payment, or questions about the legitimate sourcing of client funds. Patterns show with the cases that Godur typically retains separate counsel for each fraud allegation or claimant, suggesting an effort to compartmentalize the growing number of disputes.

Amid these developments, three prominent civil lawsuits have leveled severe accusations against Godur, his father Morris Jaime Godur, associate Anna DeFrank, and affiliated companies, detailing alleged schemes involving millions in investor losses through deception, forgery, and personal enrichment.

The federal case Old Jamestown Storage LLC et al. v. Capital Max Group, LLC et al. (Case No. 9:25-cv-80647, Southern District of Florida) outlines a purported $2.3 million financing fraud. According to the complaint, Justin and Morris Godur falsely claimed access to a $30 million European loan, inducing Old Jamestown and investor Rigsby to transfer $2.3 million for nonexistent financing. The filing alleges the pair admitted no real lender or agreement existed, yet diverted funds for luxuries like a high-end vehicle and office enhancements. They reportedly defaulted on a June 2024 repayment plan after paying only $400,000 of the required $2.3 million over 23 months. A February 2025 promissory note for $1.114 million was also allegedly breached, with $1.9 million outstanding. Charges include securities fraud under SEC Regulation D, intentional misrepresentation to solicit investments, and contract violations. Notably, the suit warns of a potential Ponzi structure, as the Godurs allegedly solicit new capital via a $100 million SEC-registered offering to offset prior obligations.

In Broward County Circuit Court, Pinnacle Equity II, LLC v. Godur et al. (Case No. CACE-25-008622) accuses the defendants of orchestrating over $2.5 million in theft via a web of forgeries and sham entities. Key claims detail Justin Godur forging a consultation contract and signature to siphon $1 million from Pinnacle’s account; creating $545,765 in fake invoices for unperformed construction work funneled through shells; and squandering stolen money on Pennsylvania properties, a Chevy Tahoe, private jet travel, luxury accommodations, and fine dining. The complaint highlights falsified approvals, bounced checks, and fraudulent term sheets to mask the operation, plus dozens of interconnected companies for money laundering. Morris Jaime Godur’s unfulfilled personal guarantees and indemnifications are cited, alongside the fraud’s ripple effects, including Pinnacle’s entanglement in a California lender dispute and a $4.5 million civil theft claim from Butternut Investment Group.

Echoing these tactics, Butternut Investment Group, LLC et al. v. Defgod LLC et al. (Case No. CACE-25-006054, Broward County) alleges a $1.5 million conspiracy targeting a Deerfield Beach real estate venture. Justin Godur, Anna DeFrank, and Morris Jaime Godur are accused of rerouting investor funds to controlled entities, forging asset pledges, and filing deceptive UCC liens to encumber promised clear titles. Misused proceeds reportedly funded personal extravagances such as real estate, vehicles, and high-end travel. The suit emphasizes exploitation of elderly victims over 65, civil theft with criminal intent, negligent and fraudulent misrepresentations about ownership and solvency, and coordinated efforts to aid conversions, breach fiduciary duties, and execute insider transfers to evade recovery.

Further actions compound the scrutiny: an eviction suit by Via Mizner Owner I, LLC against Justin Scott Godur for non-payment (Palm Beach County, filed March 26, 2025); a real property eviction against Capital Max Group LLC, owned by Godur, by Kenneth Lawrence Company LLC (filed February 5, 2025); and a federal labor dispute, Matoza v. Capital Max Group, LLC (Case No. 1:2025cv22248, Southern District of Florida), claiming violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, including unpaid wages.

These allegations, drawn from civil complaints, remain unproven, with no public responses from the defendants in available records as of late 2025.

Comments
Market Opportunity
Scamcoin Logo
Scamcoin Price(SCAM)
$0.000811
$0.000811$0.000811
-8.67%
USD
Scamcoin (SCAM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

SEC Staff Clarifies Custody Rules for Tokenized Stocks and Bonds

SEC Staff Clarifies Custody Rules for Tokenized Stocks and Bonds

The post SEC Staff Clarifies Custody Rules for Tokenized Stocks and Bonds appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The US Securities and Exchange Commission’s Trading
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/19 08:51
Breaking: CME Group Unveils Solana and XRP Options

Breaking: CME Group Unveils Solana and XRP Options

CME Group launches Solana and XRP options, expanding crypto offerings. SEC delays Solana and XRP ETF approvals, market awaits clarity. Strong institutional demand drives CME’s launch of crypto options contracts. In a bold move to broaden its cryptocurrency offerings, CME Group has officially launched options on Solana (SOL) and XRP futures. Available since October 13, 2025, these options will allow traders to hedge and manage exposure to two of the most widely traded digital assets in the market. The new contracts come in both full-size and micro-size formats, with expiration options available daily, monthly, and quarterly, providing flexibility for a diverse range of market participants. This expansion aligns with the rising demand for innovative products in the crypto space. Giovanni Vicioso, CME Group’s Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products, noted that the new options offer increased flexibility for traders, from institutions to active individual investors. The growing liquidity in Solana and XRP futures has made the introduction of these options a timely move to meet the needs of an expanding market. Also Read: Vitalik Buterin Reveals Ethereum’s Bold Plan to Stay Quantum-Secure and Simple! Rapid Growth in Solana and XRP Futures Trading CME Group’s decision to roll out options on Solana and XRP futures follows the substantial growth in these futures products. Since the launch of Solana futures in March 2025, more than 540,000 contracts, totaling $22.3 billion in notional value, have been traded. In August 2025, Solana futures set new records, with an average daily volume (ADV) of 9,000 contracts valued at $437.4 million. The average daily open interest (ADOI) hit 12,500 contracts, worth $895 million. Similarly, XRP futures, which launched in May 2025, have seen significant adoption, with over 370,000 contracts traded, totaling $16.2 billion. XRP futures also set records in August 2025, with an ADV of 6,600 contracts valued at $385 million and a record ADOI of 9,300 contracts, worth $942 million. Institutional Demand for Advanced Hedging Tools CME Group’s expansion into options is a direct response to growing institutional interest in sophisticated cryptocurrency products. Roman Makarov from Cumberland Options Trading at DRW highlighted the market demand for more varied crypto products, enabling more advanced risk management strategies. Joshua Lim from FalconX also noted that the new options products meet the increasing need for institutional hedging tools for assets like Solana and XRP, further cementing their role in the digital asset space. The launch of options on Solana and XRP futures marks another step toward the maturation of the cryptocurrency market, providing a broader range of tools for managing digital asset exposure. SEC’s Delay on Solana and XRP ETF Approvals While CME Group expands its offerings, the broader market is also watching the progress of Solana and XRP exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed its decisions on multiple crypto-related ETF filings, including those for Solana and XRP. Despite the delay, analysts anticipate approval may be on the horizon. This week, REX Shares and Osprey Funds are expected to launch an XRP ETF that will hold XRP directly and allocate at least 40% of its assets to other XRP-related ETFs. Despite the delays, some analysts believe that approval could come soon, fueling further interest in these assets. The delay by the SEC has left many crypto investors awaiting clarity, but approval of these ETFs could fuel further momentum in the Solana and XRP futures markets. Also Read: Tether CEO Breaks Silence on $117,000 Bitcoin Price – Market Reacts! The post Breaking: CME Group Unveils Solana and XRP Options appeared first on 36Crypto.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:35
US Lawmakers May Limit De Minimis Tax Exemptions to Stablecoins, Excluding Bitcoin

US Lawmakers May Limit De Minimis Tax Exemptions to Stablecoins, Excluding Bitcoin

The post US Lawmakers May Limit De Minimis Tax Exemptions to Stablecoins, Excluding Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. US lawmakers are considering de
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/19 09:28