Terraform Labs has filed a $4B lawsuit against Jump Trading, alleging secret deals, market manipulation, and illicit profits tied to UST and LUNA’s collapse.Terraform Labs has filed a $4B lawsuit against Jump Trading, alleging secret deals, market manipulation, and illicit profits tied to UST and LUNA’s collapse.

Terraform Labs administrator sues Jump Trading for $4B

The court-appointed administrator overseeing the closure and bankruptcy proceedings of the now-defunct Terraform Labs has filed a $4 billion lawsuit against Jump Trading, accusing the trading firm of knowingly playing a part in its collapse.

In the complaint filed Thursday in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Terraform Labs blames Jump for unlawfully profiting from Terraform’s rise and fall through “market manipulation, secret agreements, and misuse of digital assets.” 

The Office of the Terraform Labs Plan Administrator claims those actions helped inflate the ecosystem before leaving investors exposed when it unraveled. It is seeking to hold Jump co-founder William DiSomma and president Kanav Kariya accountable for allegedly acquiring wealth at the expense of TerraUSD stablecoin and its sister token, Luna. 

“The action aims to recover value for creditors and hold Jump responsible for exploiting the ecosystem, leaving unsuspecting investors to bear the losses,” the Terra Money Chapter 11 procedural official X account wrote.

Jump trading conducted secret token deals, administrator says

According to the lawsuit, Jump and Terraform supposedly entered into several secret agreements starting in 2019, which gave the former platform preferential access to Luna tokens at deeply discounted prices. Those arrangements allegedly allowed the trading firm to amass profits when Luna’s market value surged to an all-time high in 2022.

Per one agreement cited in the complaint, Jump purchased millions of Luna tokens for 40 cents a pop. At its peak, Luna traded above $110 per token, and according to court filings from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Jump made about $1 billion by selling the token at its highs.

The lawsuit also reiterated these deals were not disclosed to the public market, so Jump had an unfair advantage over retail investors who bought tokens without knowing the true structure of the ecosystem. The arrangements, according to the administrator, distorted market pricing and hid several fundamental weaknesses in the Luna token and Terraform’s business.

Speaking to the Wall Street Journal, a Jump spokeswoman rejected the claims and called the lawsuit an attempt by Do Kwon’s camp to deflect their responsibility in the fall of the digital token issuer. 

“This is a desperate attempt by Terraform Labs to shift blame and financial responsibility away from the crimes that Do Kwon committed. We will defend ourselves vigorously against these baseless claims,” she said.

Jump Trading propped up TerraUSD behind the scenes

Terraform Labs piled on their legal charges against Jump Trading saying it secretly intervened to support TerraUSD, Terraform’s algorithmic stablecoin, and helped trick the public to believe the system was functioning as it was meant to do.

Terraform collapsed in 2022 after TerraUSD lost its one-to-one peg with the US dollar, and Luna, the “system stabilizer,” plunged to near zero merely three days after the depeg. The sudden crash erased roughly $40 billion in market value and left thousands of investors with empty coffers.

The administrator alleges that before the final collapse, Jump had entered into a “gentlemen’s agreement” with Terraform to help keep TerraUSD’s peg. That arrangement was allegedly kept hidden to avoid regulatory scrutiny.

The office insisted that in May 2021, when UST briefly slipped below $1 and recovered, it was from the causality of large-scale purchases by Jump. The Chicago-based algorithmic trading company supposedly “misled the public” by pushing Terraform to tell the public UST’s peg had been restored organically.

Luna Foundation Guard benefited Jump officials and Do Kwon

After the initial depegging took place in 2021, Terraform created the Luna Foundation Guard, a reserve to defend TerraUSD using Bitcoin and other crypto assets. The plan administrator added that the foundation was directed by Terraform founder Do Kwon and Jump’s Kariya.

When TerraUSD depegged again in May 2022 and entered a so-called death spiral, the administrator claims nearly 50,000 bitcoins were transferred from the foundation to Jump without any written agreement of how the assets would be used.

Terraform filed for bankruptcy in January 2024 and agreed to pay about $4.5 billion to settle a civil securities fraud lawsuit brought by the SEC. About $300 million in assets have been recovered so far to compensate creditors, per public filings shared by the fallen crypto company.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Market Opportunity
Jump Tom Logo
Jump Tom Price(JUMP)
$0.000000000000000000000001
$0.000000000000000000000001$0.000000000000000000000001
0.00%
USD
Jump Tom (JUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

DEX Screener is used by crypto traders who need access to on-chain data like trading volumes, liquidity, and token prices. This information allows them to analyze trends, monitor new listings, and make informed investment decisions. In this tutorial, I will build a DEXScreener clone from scratch, covering everything from the initial design to a functional app. We will use Streamlit, a Python framework for building full-stack apps.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/18 15:05
Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

A viral chart documenting a sharp decline in U.S. federal employment during President Trump's second term has sparked unexpected confusion in cryptocurrency markets
Share
Coinstats2025/12/20 01:13
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00