The world of prediction markets is facing a crucial year, perhaps the most important in its history.The world of prediction markets is facing a crucial year, perhaps the most important in its history.

Prediction Markets: Will 2026 Mark the Turning Point for a $50 Billion Industry?

The world of prediction markets is facing a crucial year, perhaps the most important in its history.

According to Marcin Kazmierczak, co-founder of RedStone, 2026 could represent the definitive turning point: if even just 1-2% of derivatives traders were to adopt these tools, the sector could reach an annual volume of 50 billion dollars.

An unimaginable milestone just a few years ago, but today increasingly within reach thanks to unprecedented growth.

Structural Demand and Accelerated Growth

The data collected in 2025 is clear: the growth of prediction markets is no longer just a passing trend, but reflects a structural demand.

Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have recorded record volumes in the last quarter, confirming the growing interest of investors.

During the 2024 U.S. presidential elections, the total volume exceeded 10 billion dollars, marking a tenfold increase compared to 2020.

This expansion has not gone unnoticed by major investors, who have decided to further support the sector’s growth.

According to Kazmierczak, 2026 will likely see a continuation of this trend, especially in the United States, where Kalshi’s regulated model opens the doors to broader retail adoption through traditional brokers.

The New Competition: Duopoly Under Pressure

Until today, the market was dominated by a duopoly: Kalshi and Polymarket. However, the competitive dynamics are rapidly changing.

Kalshi maintains its leading position thanks to strict regulatory compliance and integrations with major brokers. The agreement with Robinhood in 2025 led Kalshi to hold about 66% of the market share in the United States.

On the other hand, Polymarket continues to excel for its crypto-native user experience and global coverage. However, increasing regulatory scrutiny and fee compression are eroding its competitive advantages.

Meanwhile, new players like Robinhood, Gemini, and Coinbase are integrating prediction markets as additional features rather than central products.

This bundling strategy within super-apps could attract a massive influx of retail users, especially in the absence of regulatory hurdles. We might be witnessing the definitive transformation of the duopoly into a multipolar market, where distribution surpasses specialization.

2026: A Pivotal Year

The coming year will be decisive: prediction markets are at a crossroads between consolidation and the risk of a sharp slowdown.

For decades, this model has existed on the fringes of mass adoption, but today, thanks to increasingly seamless integrations and a growing cultural interest, it seems to have reached escape velocity.

If adoption were to reach even a small fraction of derivatives traders, the sector could exceed $50 billion in annual volume. However, there is a tangible risk: the current user base is largely composed of retail.

If the “hyper-gambling” narrative were to attract political attention, we might witness a regulatory backlash aimed at protecting users from themselves.

A paradox: just as prediction markets are proving their worth both as informational tools and financial primitives, they might see their growth stunted for paternalistic reasons.

Prediction Markets as a New Financial Infrastructure

If the current trend continues, prediction markets are set to become a central element in the attention economy.

They could evolve into real-time sentiment indicators, risk management tools, and even feedback mechanisms for public policies.

The real question, according to Kazmierczak, is not whether the sector will be able to scale, but whether the gatekeepers—regulators and legislators—will allow it to happen.

Integration with mainstream platforms, increasing legitimacy, and retail adoption are all factors driving the sector towards maturity, but they also represent its Achilles’ heel: a single wave of negative attention is enough to call everything into question.

A Look into the Future

The year 2026 is shaping up to be the moment of truth for prediction markets. On one hand, there is the potential to establish themselves as a new financial and informational infrastructure; on the other, the risk of seeing their growth limited by regulatory interventions.

In any case, the sector has already demonstrated a real demand and has attracted the interest of major financial players.

The game will be played on the ability to balance innovation, regulation, and mass adoption. If the sector manages to overcome the challenges ahead, prediction markets could truly become one of the pillars of future finance.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

The post Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP ETFs have crossed $1 billion in assets
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 02:55
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26
New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York’s top financial regulator urged banks to adopt blockchain analytics, signaling tighter oversight of crypto-linked risks. The move reflects regulators’ concern that traditional institutions face rising exposure to digital assets. While crypto-native firms already rely on monitoring tools, the Department of Financial Services now expects banks to use them to detect illicit activity. NYDFS Outlines Compliance Expectations The notice, issued on Wednesday by Superintendent Adrienne Harris, applies to all state-chartered banks and foreign branches. In its industry letter, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) emphasized that blockchain analytics should be integrated into compliance programs according to each bank’s size, operations, and risk appetite. The regulator cautioned that crypto markets evolve quickly, requiring institutions to update frameworks regularly. “Emerging technologies introduce evolving threats that require enhanced monitoring tools,” the notice stated. It stressed the need for banks to prevent money laundering, sanctions violations, and other illicit finance linked to virtual currency transactions. To that end, the Department listed specific areas where blockchain analytics can be applied: Screening customer wallets with crypto exposure to assess risks. Verifying the origin of funds from virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Monitoring the ecosystem holistically to detect money laundering or sanctions exposure. Identifying and assessing counterparties, such as third-party VASPs. Evaluating expected versus actual transaction activity, including dollar thresholds. Weighing risks tied to new digital asset products before rollout. These examples highlight how institutions can tailor monitoring tools to strengthen their risk management frameworks. The guidance expands on NYDFS’s Virtual Currency-Related Activities (VCRA) framework, which has governed crypto oversight in the state since 2022. Regulators Signal Broader Impact Market observers say the notice is less about new rules and more about clarifying expectations. By formalizing the role of blockchain analytics in traditional finance, New York is reinforcing the idea that banks cannot treat crypto exposure as a niche concern. Analysts also believe the approach could ripple beyond New York. Federal agencies and regulators in other states may view the guidance as a blueprint for aligning banking oversight with the realities of digital asset adoption. For institutions, failure to adopt blockchain intelligence tools may invite regulatory scrutiny and undermine their ability to safeguard customer trust. With crypto now firmly embedded in global finance, New York’s stance suggests that blockchain analytics are no longer optional for banks — they are essential to protecting the financial system’s integrity.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 08:49