The post Curve Governance Vote Rejects CRV Grant for Swiss Stake appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Curve DAO blocks $6.2M CRV grant as majority vote turns againstThe post Curve Governance Vote Rejects CRV Grant for Swiss Stake appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Curve DAO blocks $6.2M CRV grant as majority vote turns against

Curve Governance Vote Rejects CRV Grant for Swiss Stake

  • Curve DAO blocks $6.2M CRV grant as majority vote turns against core team funding proposal.
  • Yearn and Convex-linked wallets drive nearly 90% of votes opposing the Curve development grant.
  • CRV price rises despite rejection as tokenholders push for tighter funding scrutiny.

The Curve DAO has rejected a governance proposal that would have allocated 17.4 million CRV tokens, valued at about $6.2 million, to the decentralized exchange’s core development team. The decision followed a vote that raised ongoing questions around governance structure, funding transparency, and the concentration of voting power within major DeFi protocols.

The proposal was submitted by Michael Egorov, founder of Curve Finance. It sought approval for a CRV token grant to Swiss Stake AG, the firm that oversees Curve’s core development and is managed by Egorov. According to the proposal, the funding was intended to support software development, infrastructure, security work, and broader ecosystem maintenance.

Swiss Stake employs roughly 25 contributors working on Curve, which is currently the third-largest decentralized exchange in DeFi, with more than $2.1 billion in total value locked, based on data from DeFiLlama.

Voting Outcome and Influence of Large Holders

When voting concluded, 54.46% of participating tokenholders opposed the proposal, while 45.54% voted in favor. On-chain voting data showed that addresses associated with Yearn Finance and Convex Finance accounted for nearly 90% of the votes cast against the grant.

The concentration of dissenting votes from these entities drew attention to how a small number of large stakeholders can shape governance outcomes at Curve.

Process Concerns and Historical Context

Beyond the final tally, forum discussions highlighted procedural issues. Some tokenholders stated that Swiss Stake should provide clearer disclosure on how previous allocations were used before seeking additional funding. Others suggested that future grants, if approved, be distributed in multiple installments to reduce potential market impact on CRV.

The rejection contrasts with a prior funding decision. In August 2024, Egorov requested more than 21 million CRV tokens, worth approximately $6.3 million at the time, and the DAO approved the proposal with nearly 91% support. The shift in voting outcomes indicates tighter scrutiny of funding requests.

Comparable governance debates have emerged elsewhere in DeFi, including at Aave, where recent fee allocation decisions prompted discussion about tokenholder rights and governance processes.

Following the vote, CRV traded higher over 24 hours, rising to around $0.377, reflecting a gain of approximately 5.4%. Trading volume increased to about $112.6 million, while market capitalization climbed to $538.9 million.

Related: Curve DAO Proposal Seeks $6.7 Million in CRV for Llamalend V2 and FXSwap

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/curve-dao-rejects-6-2m-crv-grant-for-core-development-team/

Market Opportunity
Curve Logo
Curve Price(CRV)
$0.3709
$0.3709$0.3709
+1.67%
USD
Curve (CRV) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.