Uniswap governance has approved the Unification proposal with overwhelming support, marking one of the most significant protocol‑level changes in Uniswap’s history. The decision sets in motion a series of coordinated upgrades, including a 100 million UNI token burn, activation of protocol fee switches, and the removal of frontend fees after a two‑day timelock.Uniswap governance has approved the Unification proposal with overwhelming support, marking one of the most significant protocol‑level changes in Uniswap’s history. The decision sets in motion a series of coordinated upgrades, including a 100 million UNI token burn, activation of protocol fee switches, and the removal of frontend fees after a two‑day timelock.

Uniswap’s Unification Proposal Passes, Triggering UNI Burn and Fee Switch Activation

2025/12/26 17:26
News Brief
Uniswap governance has approved the Unification proposal with overwhelming support, marking one of the most significant protocol‑level changes in Uniswap’s history. The decision sets in motion a series of coordinated upgrades, including a 100 million UNI token burn, activation of protocol fee switches, and the removal of frontend fees after a two‑day timelock.

Uniswap governance has approved the Unification proposal with overwhelming support, marking one of the most significant protocol‑level changes in Uniswap’s history. The decision sets in motion a series of coordinated upgrades, including a 100 million UNI token burn, activation of protocol fee switches, and the removal of frontend fees after a two‑day timelock.

Key Outcomes of the Vote

The passed proposal authorizes several major changes:

  • 100M UNI burned: A one‑time supply reduction, permanently removing tokens from circulation.
  • Protocol fee switch activated: Enables Uniswap to capture a portion of swap fees at the protocol level, redirecting value from pure usage to UNI holders and governance‑directed purposes.
  • Frontend fees removed: Uniswap’s official interface will no longer charge frontend fees, improving user experience and competitiveness.
  • 2‑day timelock: Provides a short buffer before execution, allowing for final review and transparency.

Uniswap governance portal:
https://gov.uniswap.org/

Why This Matters

The Unification proposal resolves long‑standing debates around value accrual in Uniswap. Until now, most economic benefits flowed to liquidity providers, while UNI functioned primarily as a governance token. Activating the fee switch shifts Uniswap closer to a protocol‑revenue model.

Combined with a large token burn, the changes introduce both supply reduction and cash‑flow potential into UNI’s long‑term economics.

Fee Switch: From Theory to Execution

Uniswap’s fee switch has existed in code for years but remained inactive due to governance and regulatory considerations. Its activation signals:

  • Greater maturity in DAO governance
  • Confidence in regulatory and operational footing
  • Alignment with broader DeFi trends toward sustainable revenue

Protocol fees can now be directed according to governance decisions, including treasury growth, ecosystem funding, or potential distributions.

Frontend Fee Removal and Competitive Positioning

By eliminating frontend fees, Uniswap improves its position against competing DEXs and aggregators. This move prioritizes volume growth and liquidity depth, potentially offsetting fee reductions through increased usage and protocol‑level capture.

Market and Ecosystem Implications

The combination of a major token burn, revenue activation, and UX improvements is rare in DeFi governance. Analysts view the vote as a signal that Uniswap is transitioning from a pure infrastructure layer into a cash‑flow‑generating protocol with clearer tokenholder alignment.

That said, the real impact will depend on:

  • Actual fee revenue captured
  • Governance decisions on fee allocation
  • Regulatory considerations around value distribution

What Happens Next

After the 2‑day timelock, execution of the approved changes will begin. Market participants will be watching closely for:

  • On‑chain confirmation of the UNI burn
  • Initial protocol fee metrics
  • Any follow‑up governance proposals on fee usage

Conclusion

The passage of Uniswap’s Unification proposal represents a turning point for UNI. With 100M tokens burned, fee switches finally activated, and frontend fees removed, Uniswap has moved decisively toward sustainable protocol economics.

Governance has spoken—and now execution begins.

Market Opportunity
UNISWAP Logo
UNISWAP Price(UNI)
$5,909
$5,909$5,909
+0,05%
USD
UNISWAP (UNI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles published on this page are written by independent contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of MEXC. All content is intended for informational and educational purposes only and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile — please conduct your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

You May Also Like

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Quality is not about testing everything; quality is about testing what is most important.
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/26 16:05
US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

The plant is located in Ukraine and has been under Russian control since 2022, with its future management a key issue in peace talks.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/26 18:58
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00