The post Arbitrum leads 2025 inflows, but ARB hesitates – What comes next in 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In crypto, revenue, fees, and users matterThe post Arbitrum leads 2025 inflows, but ARB hesitates – What comes next in 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In crypto, revenue, fees, and users matter

Arbitrum leads 2025 inflows, but ARB hesitates – What comes next in 2026?

In crypto, revenue, fees, and users matter more than narratives — and Arbitrum checks all three.

While market narratives rotated aggressively, capital quietly consolidated into scalable infrastructure.

Ethereum’s Layer 2 Arbitrum steadily absorbed that capital throughout 2025, signaling confidence in production-ready execution environments.

Despite this steady inflow, Arbitrum lagged underlying growth. At the time of writing, ARB’s price remained subdued near multi-month lows.

So, if capital continued flowing in, why did the price stay compressed?

Capital rotation favored Layer 2 infrastructure

Arbitrum [ARB] recorded the highest net inflows among major chains in 2025, based on Artemis on-chain data.

This trend reflected capital rotation toward networks offering scalability, liquidity, and proven reliability. Arbitrum benefited as investors prioritized infrastructure over short-term speculation.

Source: Artemis

Unlike incentive-driven surges, Arbitrum’s inflows appeared steady. This consistency suggested structural positioning rather than transient capital movement.

Looking at fundamental growth, the picture strengthened

On-chain fundamentals across Arbitrum expanded throughout 2025.

The total value secured reached approximately $20B, reflecting deep liquidity anchoring the network. Tokenized stocks launched via Robinhood surpassed $50M in trading volume, reinforcing real-world adoption.

October revenue reached roughly $4.5M across multiple verticals. Arbitrum Timeboost surpassed $6M in cumulative fees collected.

Timeboost auction participation remained concentrated among four entities, suggesting early institutional engagement rather than demand exhaustion.

Activity without incentives told a clearer story

Arbitrum consistently ranked among the most active Layer 2 networks by transaction count, second only to Base.

Importantly, this activity persisted without airdrop incentives driving volume, suggesting organic, application-driven usage rather than speculative bursts.

Compared with peers, Arbitrum maintained steady throughput without volatility spikes typically tied to incentive campaigns

ARB price compression meets indicator hesitation

As of the 28th of December, ARB continued trading inside a long-term falling wedge, hovering near the lower boundary around $0.19.

Despite repeated tests of this support zone, the ARB price showed limited downside follow-through. Historically, similar interactions preceded upside reactions.

Source: TradingView

Momentum indicators reflected hesitation rather than breakdown. RSI remained near neutral, while MACD showed muted momentum, signaling compression instead of exhaustion.

Was ARB’s price absorbing weakness — or preparing for expansion?


Final Thoughts

  • Arbitrum’s 2025 inflows reflected sustained on-chain capital rotation supported by usage, fees, and revenue growth.
  • ARB price compression near $0.19 highlighted tension between strengthening fundamentals and short-term indicator hesitation heading into 2026.
Next: Zcash blasts 17%, blasting Solana on THIS front – What happens now?

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/arbitrum-leads-2025-inflows-but-arb-hesitates-what-comes-next-in-2026/

Market Opportunity
Arbitrum Logo
Arbitrum Price(ARB)
$0,1955
$0,1955$0,1955
-0,50%
USD
Arbitrum (ARB) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
Year-End Pressure Mounts On Bitcoin As Cycle Faces Test

Year-End Pressure Mounts On Bitcoin As Cycle Faces Test

Bitcoin is playing big at the end of this year. For the first time since its creation, the flagship crypto could close a post-halving year in the red. An unprecedented
Share
Coinstats2025/12/29 14:05
XRP and Cardano need to prove they're useful beyond just fans, Mike Novogratz says

XRP and Cardano need to prove they're useful beyond just fans, Mike Novogratz says

Markets Share Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
XRP and Cardano need to prove they're useful
Share
Coindesk2025/12/29 14:54