A new Senate bill seeks to define crypto regulation by separating SEC and CFTC roles while requiring bipartisan support to pass. The US crypto market faces a turningA new Senate bill seeks to define crypto regulation by separating SEC and CFTC roles while requiring bipartisan support to pass. The US crypto market faces a turning

US Senate Pushes Legislation to Keep SEC Out of Crypto With Potential Market Shift

2026/01/04 21:55
3 min read

A new Senate bill seeks to define crypto regulation by separating SEC and CFTC roles while requiring bipartisan support to pass.

The US crypto market faces a turning point as lawmakers move fast on new rules. A Senate bill aims to limit SEC control over digital assets.

The proposal arrives as firms seek clarity and stability. Market analysts are watching Congress closely as momentum builds across the financial sector.

Senate Bill Targets SEC Authority Over Crypto

US lawmakers have submitted legislation designed to reduce SEC oversight of crypto markets.

The bill focuses on separating digital assets from traditional securities rules. As a result, regulatory roles would become more defined across agencies. 

Consequently, supporters argue that this approach supports market order and legal certainty.

The proposal arrives during increased debate on crypto regulation in Congress. Lawmakers are scheduled to review the bill in mid January. 

However, committee approval would still require bipartisan backing. Therefore, negotiations remain central to the bill’s progress.

Industry leaders say unclear rules have pushed firms offshore. Meanwhile, overseas markets have advanced faster with defined crypto frameworks. 

US officials now face pressure to keep innovation domestic. This context adds urgency to the legislative process.

CLARITY Act Review and Senate Vote Requirements

The CLARITY Act would require support from both major parties to advance. Although committee passage appears possible, Senate debate rules raise the threshold.

Sixty votes would be needed to move the bill forward. 

Therefore, cross party support remains essential. Republican backing alone may not secure final passage.

However, discussions with Democrats have continued during the recess period. Some lawmakers report productive talks on market structure topics. 

These talks aim to balance innovation with consumer safeguards. The bill also seeks clearer roles for the SEC and CFTC.

Lawmakers will assess how tokens should be classified. They will also review how exchanges should register. As a result, regulatory overlap could be reduced.

Related Reading: Senator Lummis Urges Congress to Pass Crypto Market Structure Bill

Market Response and Broader Regulatory Context

The Senate move comes as crypto markets show resilience during policy uncertainty. While government operations have faced pauses, digital asset activity has continued.

Meanwhile, ETF filings have resumed as agencies return to full operations. 

Thus, this timing links legislation with market confidence. Several crypto ETF applications remain under review by regulators.

As agencies reopen, approval processes may accelerate. Analysts expect renewed activity across multiple digital assets. 

Additionally, legislative clarity could support structured market growth. Global developments also influence US decisions.

Europe and other regions have already enacted crypto rules. US lawmakers now face competitive pressure. 

The post US Senate Pushes Legislation to Keep SEC Out of Crypto With Potential Market Shift appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
Talus Logo
Talus Price(US)
$0.00338
$0.00338$0.00338
-4.24%
USD
Talus (US) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump's latest 'particularly creepy' move alarms psychologist: 'Aggrandizing himself'

Trump's latest 'particularly creepy' move alarms psychologist: 'Aggrandizing himself'

President Donald Trump's latest "particularly creepy" move alarmed a psychologist over the weekend. Dr. John Gartner, a psychologist and psychotherapist, discussed
Share
Rawstory2026/02/23 11:26
Rwanda Mineral Exports Surge 46% as Trade Deficit Narrows in 2025

Rwanda Mineral Exports Surge 46% as Trade Deficit Narrows in 2025

Rwanda’s mineral exports delivered a powerful performance in 2025, with shipments of tin, tungsten and tantalum rising by 46.2 percent year on year. The expansion
Share
Furtherafrica2026/02/23 11:00
ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

The post ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jimmy Kimmel (Photo by Media Access Awards Presented By Easterseals/Getty Images for Easterseals) Getty Images for Easterseals The shock decision by ABC to pull Jimmy Kimmel Live! “indefinitely” after the late-night host’s remarks about the killing of Charlie Kirk has created a rare moment in modern TV media: A major show abruptly taken off the air, with its network forced into crisis-management mode. Rare, that is, but not unprecedented. What might go unnoticed by many people reacting to the news about Kimmel and his potential cancellation is that this is not the first time ABC has made such a move. In fact, a version of the same thing happened to Kimmel’s predecessor program — Bill Maher’s Politically Incorrect, which once had Kimmel’s slot and which ABC cancelled in the wake of a firestorm around comments Maher made in the immediate aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks. (Notice, by the way, that I said cancelled “in the wake of” and not “because of.” More on that in a moment.) Here’s what happened: Less than a week after 9/11, Maher and a panel were talking about then-President George W. Bush’s use of the word “cowards” to describe the hijackers. “We have been the cowards,” Maher interjected, referencing the practice of “lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That’s cowardly.” But Maher then went even farther over the line: Actually staying in an airplane as it hits a building? “Not cowardly.” You can read more about the ensuing uproar in this ABC news story from 2001, which includes a statement that Maher issued through his publicist: “In no way was I intending to say, nor have I ever thought, that the men and women who defend our nation in uniform are anything but courageous and valiant, and I offer my apologies to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:02