Among the most sensitive requirements in the new Indian Telecom Security Assurance Requirements is access to source code — the underlying programming instructionsAmong the most sensitive requirements in the new Indian Telecom Security Assurance Requirements is access to source code — the underlying programming instructions

India proposes forcing smartphone makers to give source code in security overhaul

2026/01/12 14:29
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

NEW DELHI, India – India proposes requiring smartphone makers to share source code with the government and make several software changes as part of a raft of security measures, prompting behind-the-scenes opposition from giants like Apple and Samsung.

The tech companies have countered that the package of 83 security standards, which would also include a requirement to alert the government to major software updates, lacks any global precedent and risks revealing proprietary details, according to four people familiar with the discussions and a Reuters review of confidential government and industry documents.

The plan is part of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s efforts to boost security of user data as online fraud and data breaches increase in the world’s second-largest smartphone market, with nearly 750 million phones.

IT Secretary S. Krishnan told Reuters on Saturday, January 10, “any legitimate concerns of the industry will be addressed with an open mind”, adding it was “premature to read more into it”.

A ministry spokesperson said in an emailed statement on Saturday it could not comment further due to ongoing consultation with tech companies on the proposals.

After the story was published, an IT ministry statement said late on Sunday that the consultations are aimed at developing “an appropriate and robust regulatory framework for mobile security”, and it “routinely” engaged with the industry “to better understand technical and compliance burden.”

The IT ministry added it “refutes the statement” that it is considering seeking source code from smartphone makers, without elaborating or commenting on the government or industry documents cited by Reuters.

Ongoing tug of war over government requirements

Apple, South Korea’s Samsung, Google, China’s Xiaomi, and MAIT, the Indian industry group that represents the firms, did not respond to requests for comment.

Indian government requirements have irked technology firms before. Last month it revoked an order mandating a state-run cyber safety app on phones amid concerns over surveillance. But the government brushed aside lobbying last year and required rigorous testing for security cameras over fears of Chinese spying.

Xiaomi and Samsung — whose phones use Google’s Android operating system — hold 19% and 15%, respectively, of India’s market share and Apple 5%, Counterpoint Research estimates.

Among the most sensitive requirements in the new Indian Telecom Security Assurance Requirements is access to source code — the underlying programming instructions that make phones work. This would be analyzed and possibly tested at designated Indian labs, the documents show.

The Indian proposals also require companies to make software changes to allow pre-installed apps to be uninstalled and to block apps from using cameras and microphones in the background to “avoid malicious usage.”

“Industry raised concerns that globally security requirement have not been mandated by any country,” said a December IT ministry document detailing meetings that officials held with Apple, Samsung, Google and Xiaomi.

The security standards, drafted in 2023, are in the spotlight now as the government is considering imposing them legally. IT ministry and tech executives are due to meet on Tuesday for more discussions, sources said.

Companies say source code review, analysis, ‘not possible’

Smartphone makers closely guard their source code. Apple declined China’s request for source code between 2014 and 2016, and US law enforcement has also tried and failed to get it.

India’s proposals for “vulnerability analysis” and “source code review” would require smartphone makers to perform a “complete security assessment,” after which test labs in India could check their claims through source code review and analysis.

“This is not possible… due to secrecy and privacy,” MAIT said in a confidential document drafted in response to the government proposal, and seen by Reuters. “Major countries in the EU, North America, Australia, and Africa do not mandate these requirements.”

MAIT asked the ministry last week to drop the proposal, a source with direct knowledge said.

The Indian proposals would mandate automatic and periodic malware scanning on phones. Device makers would also have to inform the National Centre for Communication Security about major software updates and security patches before releasing them to users, and the centre would have the right to test them.

MAIT’s document says regular malware scanning significantly drains a phone’s battery and seeking government approval for software updates is “impractical” as they need to be issued promptly.

India also wants the phone’s logs – digital records of its system activity – to be stored for at least 12 months on the device.

“There is not enough room on device to store 1-year log events,” MAIT said in the document. –Rappler.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Patos (PATOS) Price Alert: 108% Gains Guaranteed from Solana Token?

Patos (PATOS) Price Alert: 108% Gains Guaranteed from Solana Token?

Following the strategic addition of crypto icon Mark Zuckerfart as Lead Marketing Executive, presale activities spiked a staggering 500%. This […] The post Patos
Share
Coindoo2026/03/09 20:49
Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Safe-Haven Status Faces Unprecedented Pressure As DBS Flags Critical Shifts

Safe-Haven Status Faces Unprecedented Pressure As DBS Flags Critical Shifts

The post Safe-Haven Status Faces Unprecedented Pressure As DBS Flags Critical Shifts appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. US Dollar: Safe-Haven Status Faces Unprecedented
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/09 20:55