Blockchain data revealed suspicious liquidity manipulation, massive wallet concentration, and a rug-pull-like scenario in Eric Adams' NYC token launch.Blockchain data revealed suspicious liquidity manipulation, massive wallet concentration, and a rug-pull-like scenario in Eric Adams' NYC token launch.

Ex-NYC Mayor’s Token Turns Rug Pull Nightmare: Over $3 Million Drained from Liquidity Pools

The launch of the NYC token, tied to former NYC mayor Eric Adams, quickly turned disastrous after it collapsed within hours.

What followed were allegations of insider selling and liquidity manipulation, sparking outrage and a wave of scrutiny across the crypto industry.

Political Token Disaster

According to on-chain analysts and blockchain tracking platforms, the token was launched suddenly and quickly gained massive attention due to Adams’ name and public promotion. Many traders assumed it had some official or civic backing. The hype pushed NYC’s market capitalization to nearly $600 million in a very short time.

However, the rally was short-lived. Data shared by Bubblemaps revealed suspicious liquidity pool activity tied to a wallet connected to the token’s deployer. One wallet, identified as 9Ty4M, created a one-sided liquidity pool on Meteora and later removed around $2.5 million in USDC near the price peak.

After the token crashed by roughly 60%, the same wallet added back only about $1.5 million and managed to extract close to $1 million from the pool. No explanation was provided for these moves.

Shortly thereafter, NYC’s market cap plunged below $100 million. Blockchain investigator Rune Crypto went further, alleging that the launch was a rug pull. It also said that the total liquidity removed later rose above $3.4 million. Lookonchain also confirmed that liquidity was pulled at the peak, which triggered panic selling across the market. One trader alone reportedly lost $473,500, which is more than 63%, in less than 20 minutes.

The token’s ownership structure raised immediate red flags, as one wallet held about 70% of the total supply and the top 10 wallets controlled nearly 99%. This level of concentration gave insiders almost total control over price action.

Further exacerbating the situation, multiple fake NYC tokens appeared at the same time, which ended up splitting liquidity and misleading traders. Adams framed the token as a political statement tied to fighting antisemitism and anti-Americanism, but investigators stressed there was no government involvement, public funds, or transparency behind the project. As liquidity vanished and prices collapsed, market watchers compared the incident to previous manipulated launches and called it one of the most extreme political-themed crypto rugs seen so far in 2026.

Hoskinson Weighs In on Meme Coins

The chaos surrounding the NYC token echoes concerns in the industry about politically tied tokens and the risks they pose to investors. Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson criticized US President Donald Trump’s involvement with meme coins, including the Official Trump Coin, calling it “extractive” and politically divisive.

He said the rollout of these tokens undermined bipartisan efforts to regulate crypto, stalling legislation like the Clarity Act and creating an environment where the sector risks being seen as corrupt. Hoskinson added that launching such coins without proper structure or transparency alienates half the country and leaves investors exposed to losses, and worsens public perception of crypto.

While not against meme coins in principle, he warned that politicized launches can collapse trust, fuel scams, and turn the market into a “predatory free-for-all.”

The post Ex-NYC Mayor’s Token Turns Rug Pull Nightmare: Over $3 Million Drained from Liquidity Pools appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Market Opportunity
TokenFi Logo
TokenFi Price(TOKEN)
$0.005016
$0.005016$0.005016
-0.45%
USD
TokenFi (TOKEN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Markets await Fed’s first 2025 cut, experts bet “this bull market is not even close to over”

Markets await Fed’s first 2025 cut, experts bet “this bull market is not even close to over”

Will the Fed’s first rate cut of 2025 fuel another leg higher for Bitcoin and equities, or does September’s history point to caution? First rate cut of 2025 set against a fragile backdrop The Federal Reserve is widely expected to…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 00:27
Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15