The Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) published a factsheet from the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on Tuesday, remindingThe Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) published a factsheet from the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on Tuesday, reminding

ESMA, CONSOB warn crypto and finance influencers over content promotion practices

The Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) published a factsheet from the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on Tuesday, reminding influencers that EU investment rules apply in the advertising of products like crypto.

Italy’s securities commission has told social media “finance influencers” that promoting crypto tokens is not the same as advertising “shoes or watches.” The CONSOB notice called to action the so-called “fin-influencers,” claiming their influence on retail investment behavior has become a concern for the European trading bloc’s financial watchdogs. 

The notice covered posts promoting cryptos, contracts for difference, forex, futures, and other speculative products marketed as “get rich quick” opportunities.

CONSOB treats crypto promotion as regulated investment advice

The ESMA factsheet, shared by CONSOB through its official channels on Tuesday, makes it clear that promoting financial products online is not comparable to advertising consumer goods. Short disclaimers and statements like “this is not investment advice,” do not protect influencers from legal responsibility, the Italian financial authority said.

“Posting investment recommendations, even in informal language, can qualify as regulated investment advice under EU law. Moreover, telling followers what to buy or avoid may require authorization from a national regulator,” the notice read. 

According to ESMA, disclaimers cannot supersede regulatory obligations on investment recommendations or advertising. Public figures and influencers who advertise financial products without the watchdog’s permission will be held accountable if their content is personalized or passes for directive advice.

The regulator warned that social media posts encouraging risky strategies can have “negative consequences” for retail audiences and inexperienced investors. ESMA and CONSOB insist that any compensation, gifts, or other benefits connected to promotions must be clearly disclosed.

“If you are not authorized to provide investment advice, do not provide personalized recommendations on what to buy, sell, or hold. Even publicly sharing your opinion about whether a stock or cryptocurrency will rise or fall, or promoting an investment strategy, may be considered an investment recommendation, to which specific rules may apply,” CONSOB wrote in its statement.

Some of the products mentioned included CFDs, leveraged forex trades, certain crowdfunding investments, and cryptocurrencies, and any asset that would result in the loss of all invested capital. 

The authority explained that influencers are legally responsible for the content they publish, so any misleading, exaggerated, or reckless posts would lead to sanctions under EU financial law.

Italy joins European countries in financial influence enforcement

The Italian notice fits into the European clampdown on online investment promotion, which ESMA first addressed in October 2021. At the time, the EU markets watchdogs propounded that misleading social media posts and undisclosed conflicts could breach the Market Abuse Regulation.

In serious circumstances, this kind of behavior could be seen as illegal investment advice or even market manipulation under EU legislation. Individuals who break the rules can be fined up to five million euros, while institutions can be fined even more.

In France, the Autorité des marchés financiers partnered with the advertising watchdog ARPP in 2023 to launch a Responsible Influence Certificate. The program requires influencers promoting financial products, including crypto assets, to complete training and testing before working with ARPP member brands.

Over to the west, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) fined Kim Kardashian $1.26 million for promoting EthereumMax tokens on Instagram without disclosing a $250,000 settlement for the advertisements.

CONSOB strengthens domestic law after MiCA compliance deadline

At the end of last year, Italy’s Companies and Exchange Commission reported that the number of blocked investment websites had now topped 1,500, six years after the start of the enforcement period. CONSOB was granted authority back in 2019 to order internet service providers (ISPs) to block websites run by unregistered virtual asset service providers.

Since then, the regulator has reportedly shut down 1,507 websites and blocked 763 individual web pages, taking the total number of blocked domains to 2,270, as of the start of 2026.

CONSOB also reiterated upcoming regulatory deadlines for crypto service providers operating in Italy. VASPs in the jurisdiction without the proper licensing were allowed to continue issuing services until the end of December last year, in tandem with the EU’s crypto law Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Market Opportunity
Lagrange Logo
Lagrange Price(LA)
$0.30392
$0.30392$0.30392
-0.60%
USD
Lagrange (LA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15