THE Philippines is examining all legal options to bring home one of the alleged masterminds behind a multibillion-peso flood control scandal, as a formal extraditionTHE Philippines is examining all legal options to bring home one of the alleged masterminds behind a multibillion-peso flood control scandal, as a formal extradition

Philippines seeks legal paths to bring flood scam suspect back from Portugal

By Chloe Mari A. Hufana, Reporter

THE Philippines is examining all legal options to bring home one of the alleged masterminds behind a multibillion-peso flood control scandal, as a formal extradition bid is unlikely without a treaty with Portugal, Interior Secretary Juanito Victor C. Remulla said on Tuesday.

President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. has ordered government agencies to study alternative avenues to repatriate former Party-list Rep. Elizaldy S. Co, Mr. Remulla said, citing approaches that could avoid the lengthy process of negotiating an extradition agreement with Lisbon.

“We are studying it because the situation is complicated,” he told reporters via teleconference in mixed English and Filipino. “We don’t have an extradition treaty with Portugal.”

Among the options being explored are coordination with international bodies such as the International Criminal Police Organization, or Interpol, and the United Nations, he said.

Negotiating an extradition treaty is not being prioritized, Mr. Remulla added, noting that such agreements typically take years to conclude and ratify.

“A treaty will take too long,” he said. “That’s why the instruction is to study other ways to do this.”

Mr. Co, who used to head the House of Representatives appropriations committee, has been linked to irregularities in government-funded flood control projects.

Investigators have flagged, among others, a P289.5-million flood control project in Oriental Mindoro implemented by the Department of Public Works and Highways.

Authorities have issued a warrant of arrest against Mr. Co for graft and malversation of public funds.

Mr. Remulla said officials are reviewing all possible mechanisms, including repatriation, while acknowledging that returning a suspect from a country without an extradition framework poses significant legal challenges.

“We will look at all avenues — and when we say all, we mean all — to make this happen,” he said.

Asked whether the case could mirror the return of former Negros Oriental Congressman Arnolfo A. Teves, Jr. from Timor-Leste, Mr. Remulla said that outcome hinged on a special accommodation by Timor-Leste’s president following direct talks with Mr. Marcos.

He said he was not aware of any comparable understanding between Manila and Lisbon.

“Extradition is almost impossible because we don’t have a treaty,” he said. “But there are other avenues we are studying so we can get him.”

The government’s focus is securing Mr. Co’s return rather than pursuing a formal extradition process, he added.

Josue Raphael J. Cortez, a diplomacy lecturer at the De La Salle-College of St. Benilde’s School of Diplomacy and Governance, said extradition requires a formal treaty and cannot rely solely on goodwill between states.

Extradition requires a treaty between countries that share common interests in combating similar crimes, he said in a Facebook Messenger chat. Acts must be criminal in both jurisdictions to qualify, while political and religious offenses are excluded under international law, he added.

Mr. Cortez said treaty negotiations typically begin with presidential approval and often take years, as governments work to balance legal standards and national interests.

“After rigorous negotiations and back-and-forth discussions on the provisions, in the case of the Philippines, we will have to secure the concurrence of the Legislature, particularly a two-thirds majority of the Senate, for such a treaty to take effect,” he said.

The case adds pressure on the Marcos administration to show progress in holding officials accountable for alleged misuse of public funds, particularly as flood control spending has come under heightened scrutiny following last year’s corruption revelations.

Market Opportunity
Scamcoin Logo
Scamcoin Price(SCAM)
$0.001104
$0.001104$0.001104
-0.45%
USD
Scamcoin (SCAM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15