The post Banks Win Key Battle as Crypto Bill Bars Stablecoin Interest Payments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief The updated crypto market structureThe post Banks Win Key Battle as Crypto Bill Bars Stablecoin Interest Payments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief The updated crypto market structure

Banks Win Key Battle as Crypto Bill Bars Stablecoin Interest Payments

In brief

  • The updated crypto market structure bill draft will prohibit digital asset providers from paying interest solely for holding payment stablecoins, while preserving exceptions for transaction-based rewards.
  • The banking industry lobbied for the provision, citing a Treasury report warning of potential deposit flight from traditional banks.
  • Three Democratic Senators have demanded a public hearing before Thursday’s markup, saying members will have less than 48 hours to review the text.

Banks secured a win in the fight over stablecoin yield as Senate lawmakers released an updated crypto market structure legislation draft Tuesday morning, which prohibits digital asset service providers from paying “any form of interest or yield” solely for holding payment stablecoins.

The provision, contained in Section 404 titled “Preserving Rewards for Stablecoin Holders,” says that a “digital asset service provider may not pay any form of interest or yield (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) solely in connection with the holding of a payment stablecoin.”

The language directly addresses months of intensive lobbying from community banks that warned stablecoin yield could drain deposits from the traditional banking system.

Kadan Stadelmann, Chief Technology Officer at Komodo Platform, told Decrypt the draft language favors traditional banks.

“Stablecoins were originally seen as an alternative to traditional banking, but this draft proposal curbs the passive yield feature, stripping them of their competitive edge,” he added.

Last week, the American Bankers Association’s Community Bankers Council sent a letter to lawmakers warning that, without stronger legislative clarity, up to $6.6 trillion in deposits could be at risk, citing concerns that crypto companies were circumventing the GENIUS Act’s intent by funneling rewards through affiliated exchanges.

Activity-based rewards remain

However, the updated draft preserves broad carve-outs for activity-based compensation.

The prohibition “shall not apply with respect to an activity-based reward or incentive,” including rewards tied to “a transaction, a payment, a transfer, a conversion, a remittance, or settlement activity,” as well as loyalty programs, providing liquidity or collateral, and “governance, validation, staking, or other ecosystem participation.”

The bill also requires the SEC and CFTC to jointly establish disclosure rules within 360 days, mandating that any compensation offered by digital asset intermediaries be presented in “plain English” with clear identification of who is paying the rewards and explicit statements that a payment stablecoin “is neither an investment product nor a deposit” and “is not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental entity.”

Senators Jack Reed (D-RI), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), and Tina Smith (D-MN) sent a letter to Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott (R-SC) demanding a public hearing before Thursday’s scheduled markup.

“It is now 6 p.m. on Monday, and neither the full Committee nor the public has seen anything resembling the text that will be marked up on Thursday at 10 a.m.,” the senators wrote, warning that members would have less than 48 hours to review the legislation and less than 24 hours to prepare amendments.

“Given how little time there is between these latest proposals and the planned hearing on Thursday, I’m not holding my breath for the bill to pass this month,” Nic Puckrin, digital asset analyst and co-founder of the Coin Bureau, told Decrypt.

He anticipated further delays “as committee members grapple with the implications of the proposed amendments,” adding that, “any delays will weigh heavily on a digital asset market that has struggled with momentum for months.”

The battle over stablecoin yield

The stablecoin yield fight traces back to the passage of the GENIUS Act last summer, which prohibited stablecoin issuers from paying interest but left questions about whether affiliated platforms could offer rewards.

Banking groups warned in August that “the restriction is easily bypassed because exchanges or other third parties can still offer rewards to stablecoin holders.”

Last week, rival stakeholders, including representatives from SIFMA and crypto industry groups, met privately to hash out disagreements over DeFi regulatory carve-outs and stablecoin yield provisions, sources told Decrypt.

The sources described the talks as “constructive” but noted SIFMA’s push to retroactively ban yield-generating stablecoins.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Source: https://decrypt.co/354386/banks-win-key-battle-as-crypto-bill-bars-stablecoin-interest-payments

Market Opportunity
WINK Logo
WINK Price(WIN)
$0.00002934
$0.00002934$0.00002934
+2.55%
USD
WINK (WIN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Slate Milk Raises $23 Million Series B Round To Bolster Protein Drink’s Rapid Growth

Slate Milk Raises $23 Million Series B Round To Bolster Protein Drink’s Rapid Growth

The post Slate Milk Raises $23 Million Series B Round To Bolster Protein Drink’s Rapid Growth appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Slate Classic Chocolate milk shake Slate A new slate of functional beverages is about to dominate the ready-to-drink shelf, ushering in a more modern era of easily incorporating more protein in our diets. Today, Slate Milk cofounders Manny Lubin and Josh Belinsky reveal the brand has raised a $23 million Series B funding round. Led by Foundership, a new fund by Yasso frozen greek yogurt cofounders Drew Harrington and Amanda Klane, the money will allow Slate to continue its momentum towards ubiquity as it hits 100,000 points of distribution across 20,000 stores nationwide by the end of 2025. Slate also reveals that it is rolling out several line extensions including a 20 gram protein Strawberry milk at Sprouts Farmers Market, a 30 gram protein Cookies & Cream milk at Target, and a 30 gram protein Salted Caramel flavor at Walmart and Albertsons banner stores. New “Ultra” 42 gram protein options in Chocolate, Vanilla and Salted Caramel will also be available in retailers across the country. “Stores where we may have just had our ready-to-drink lattes, now we’re adding our shakes, and vice versa. We’re adding new partners and executing deeper with our existing partners,” Lubin tells me. The impressive growth is due to Slate’s early entry into the high-protein product space slightly before it caught mainstream attention–ready to execute immediately once consumers craved it most. Slate’s macronutrient ratios are practically unbeatable, largely due to the utilization of ultra-filtered milk. It’s a protein drink that writes a new script about who protein drinks are for. “We’re not sons of dairy farmers. We had no milk history,” Lubin says “We’re just a couple of dudes from the burbs of Boston who like chocolate milk.” Slate cofounder Manny Lubin Slate Another Clean Slate Slate’s brand has evolved significantly in just the past six…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 03:08
The HackerNoon Newsletter: New frontiers in Human AI Interface (9/19/2025)

The HackerNoon Newsletter: New frontiers in Human AI Interface (9/19/2025)

How are you, hacker? 🪐 What’s happening in tech today, September 19, 2025? The HackerNoon Newsletter brings the HackerNoon homepage straight to your inbox. On this day, First Smiley Emoticon Created by Fahlman in 1982, US-led Invasion Restores Democracy to Haiti in 1994, New Zealand Grants Women's Suffrage in 1893, and we present you with these top quality stories. From Spacecraft From the 90s, or Why Humanity Uses Last Centurys Technology in Space to New frontiers in Human AI Interface, let’s dive right in. Spacecraft From the 90s, or Why Humanity Uses Last Centurys Technology in Space By @nftbro [ 9 Min read ] In “small space”, the priorities are different: low cost, rapid iteration, and the use of CubeSats on Raspberry Pi and Linux containers. Read More. New frontiers in Human AI Interface By @zbruceli [ 12 Min read ] Recent tech advances are breaking free from 20 years of 5-inch screen limits, unlocking full human senses in computing through AI interfaces and wearables. Read More. Microsoft’s LinkedIn Still Sucks, But Outsmarting Its Algorithm Is Hilariously Easy By @frankmorgan [ 3 Min read ] A cheeky experiment uses ChatGPT to slip LinkedIn’s walled garden, proving off-platform links still win—and why MS’s Dismal Platform must pivot or die. Read More. AI Startup Surge Risks Repeating Tech’s Last Funding Mania By @youcefhq [ 4 Min read ] The AI startup frenzy and FOMO are inflating round sizes and valuations. But too much capital too early often leads to mediocre outcomes. Remake of 2020–22? Read More. Passive Income in Crypto: Why Waiting for Altseason Is a Bad Strategy By @MichaelJerlis [ 4 Min read ] Discover the most reliable passive income strategies in crypto for 2025 — from tokenized treasuries to staking, lending, farming, and more. Read More. 🧑‍💻 What happened in your world this week? It's been said that writing can help consolidate technical knowledge, establish credibility, and contribute to emerging community standards. Feeling stuck? We got you covered ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ANSWER THESE GREATEST INTERVIEW QUESTIONS OF ALL TIME We hope you enjoy this worth of free reading material. Feel free to forward this email to a nerdy friend who'll love you for it.See you on Planet Internet! With love, The HackerNoon Team ✌️
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/20 00:02
Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns

Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns

The post Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This morning, Bitcoin Core developers celebrated improved block reconstruction statistics for node operators while conveniently ignoring the reason for these statistics — the downward trend in fees for Bitcoin’s security budget. Reacting with heart emojis and thumbs up to a green chart showing over 80% “successful compact block reconstructions without any requested transactions,” they conveniently omitted red trend lines of the fees that Bitcoin users pay for mining security which powered those green statistics. Block reconstructions occur when a node requests additional information about transactions within a compact block. Although compact blocks allow nodes to quickly relay valid bundles of transactions across the internet, the more frequently that nodes can reconstruct without extra, cumbersome transaction requests from their peers is a positive trend. Because so many nodes switched over in August to relay transactions bidding 0.1 sat/vB across their mempools, nodes now have to request less transaction data to reconstruct blocks containing sub-1 sat/vB transactions. After nodes switched over in August to accept and relay pending transactions bidding less than 1 sat/vB, disparate mempools became harmonized as most nodes had a better view of which transactions would likely join upcoming blocks. As a result, block reconstruction times improved, as nodes needed less information about these sub-1 sat/vB transactions. In July, several miners admitted that user demand for Bitcoin blockspace had persisted at such a low that they were willing to accept transaction fees of just 0.1 satoshi per virtual byte — 90% lower than their prior 1 sat/vB minimum. With so many blocks partially empty, they succumbed to the temptation to accept at least something — even 1 billionth of one bitcoin (BTC) — rather than $0 to fill up some of the excess blockspace. Read more: Bitcoin’s transaction fees have fallen to a multi-year low Green stats for block reconstruction after transaction fees crash After…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:07