The post Bitcoin Price Briefly Trades at $0 on One Platform, Liquidations Follow appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Bitcoin price briefly printedThe post Bitcoin Price Briefly Trades at $0 on One Platform, Liquidations Follow appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Bitcoin price briefly printed

Bitcoin Price Briefly Trades at $0 on One Platform, Liquidations Follow

Key Insights:

  • Bitcoin price briefly printed at $0 on Paradex due to a system error, not because of real market selling or a network failure.
  • The incident was caused by a faulty database update that pushed wrong price data into the liquidation system, wiping leveraged positions within minutes.
  • BTC price stayed stable near $92,600, showing this was a platform-specific failure and not a wider crypto market crash.

Bitcoin price did not crash across the market. BTC traded near $92,600 and moved very little over the past 24 hours. However, on one crypto trading platform, Bitcoin briefly showed a price of zero. This happened on Paradex, a perpetual futures exchange built on Starknet.

For traders using leverage, the damage was real. Positions were closed in minutes. Many users first thought it was only a screen error. It was not. A system failure pushed wrong prices into the trading engine, and the liquidation system acted on it.

What Broke Inside the Paradex System That Sent Bitcoin Price to Zero?

Paradex was doing scheduled maintenance. During this process, the team moved data inside its system. A database change went wrong. Because of this, the platform started reading Bitcoin price incorrectly.

Paradex is a crypto trading platform that lets users trade perpetual futures, also called perps. Perps are contracts where traders bet on price moves using leverage, without owning the coin. Paradex runs on Starknet, which is a faster network built on Ethereum.

Even though Paradex is called decentralized, it still uses off-chain systems to work smoothly. These include databases, pricing systems, and order engines. These parts help trades run fast, but they also mean the platform can fail if internal data breaks.

In this case, a database error fed wrong prices into the system. The liquidation engine acted on those prices right away.

For a short time, Bitcoin price showed as $0 on Paradex. The platform did not pause first. The liquidation engine reacted right away. Long positions were wiped because a price of zero means total loss in leveraged trading.

This was not a hack. No attacker took funds. It was an internal operations failure. The system trusted bad data and acted on it.

Paradex later stopped trading. The team rolled the system back to a point before the error. Open orders were canceled. Trading returned after about eight hours. This limited further damage, but it did not undo all losses.

This Same Pattern Has Appeared Before

What happened on Paradex is not new in crypto. In October 2025, Hyperliquid saw the largest liquidation wave in crypto history. During a fast market drop, more than $10 billion in positions were force-closed on that platform alone. Some traders lost everything in seconds.

The system stayed online, but users paid the price.

Hyperliquid Faced This Before | Source: X

During that same crash, dYdX stopped trading for several hours. A system edge case during heavy liquidations forced a halt. When trading resumed, some users were hit by wrong prices. The platform later discussed compensation, but losses had already happened.

Even centralized exchanges have a long record of this. BTC price has crashed to extreme lows before because of system bugs and thin order books. In past years, Bitcoin briefly traded near zero or near $8,000 on a single exchange while the rest of the market stayed normal.

Alleged Binance Issue | Source: X

The lesson from all these cases is the same. When price data breaks, leveraged systems react instantly. Traders do not get time to respond.

Bitcoin Price Was Never in Trouble

Despite the shocking headline, Bitcoin itself stayed calm. BTC price held near $92,600 across major exchanges. There was no broad market panic. No chain problem. No network failure. This was a platform-specific issue. Not a Bitcoin issue.

Still, events like this matter. Many crypto trading platforms still rely on off-chain systems like databases, order engines, and price feeds. Even when trading feels decentralized, control often sits with the platform during emergencies.

For traders, the risk is clear. High leverage turns small system mistakes into large losses. Using lower leverage, smaller position sizes, or multiple platforms can reduce damage.

Bitcoin price did nothing unusual, but history shows that these breakdowns keep coming back. So, when they do, leveraged traders feel them first as they keep using borrowed money.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2026/01/20/bitcoin-price-briefly-trades-at-0-on-one-platform-liquidations-follow/

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0005396
$0.0005396$0.0005396
-0.77%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Pump Fun Fund Launches $3M Hackathon: Market-Driven Startups

Pump Fun Fund Launches $3M Hackathon: Market-Driven Startups

The post Pump Fun Fund Launches $3M Hackathon: Market-Driven Startups appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a bid to evolve beyond its roots as a memecoin launchpad
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 20:06
WhatsApp Web to get group voice and video calls soon

WhatsApp Web to get group voice and video calls soon

The post WhatsApp Web to get group voice and video calls soon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WhatsApp is developing voice and video calling features for group
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 20:13
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28