Market maker Wintermute said that the classic four-year crypto market cycle has effectively lost relevance, and that 2025, despite the absence of the expected rallyMarket maker Wintermute said that the classic four-year crypto market cycle has effectively lost relevance, and that 2025, despite the absence of the expected rally

Wintermute: Crypto Market’s Four-year Cycle No Longer Works

  • At Wintermute, they pointed to the classic four-year crypto market cycle losing relevance.
  • Experts explained why 2026 will be a test year for altcoins and liquidity.
  • In addition, they proposed three scenarios for how the market could change this year.

Market maker Wintermute said that the classic four-year crypto market cycle has effectively lost relevance, and that 2025, despite the absence of the expected rally, could go down in history as the start of crypto’s transition from a speculative instrument to a more mature asset class.

The company noted that market dynamics are no longer driven by “self-fulfilling timing narratives.” Instead, the key factor is where liquidity flows and what investors focus on. 

As the report noted, historically, capital within the crypto market moved through a familiar pattern: Bitcoin’s rise fueled Ethereum, then large-cap altcoins, and then the broader market. However, according to Wintermute’s OTC flow data, this mechanism weakened significantly in 2025.

One of the reasons was ETFs and crypto treasuries (DAT), which have turned into a kind of “walled garden.” They provide steady demand for large assets, but do not encourage capital rotation into the broader market. 

Against the backdrop of retail attention flowing out toward the stock market, 2025 became a period of extreme capital concentration, according to analysts.

This is especially noticeable in the altcoin segment. According to a recent Wintermute estimate, in 2025 the median duration of altcoin rallies fell to 20 days, compared with about 60 days in 2024.

The company noted that investors are increasingly favoring bitcoin and Ethereum amid growing macroeconomic uncertainty. At the same time, speculative activity among retail players is shifting into other niches — from memecoins to prediction markets.

At the same time, Wintermute analysts outlined three possible paths that could broaden the market beyond a handful of large assets in 2026.

The first scenario is an expansion of ETF and DAT mandates. A significant share of new liquidity is currently staying within institutional channels, and a broader recovery is only possible if their investment universe expands. At Wintermute, the first signals of this approach are filings for ETFs linked to Solana (SOL) and XRP (XRP).

The second option is a strong rally in bitcoin or Ethereum. Such a move could create a wealth effect and restart capital rotation into the broader market, as it did in 2024. At the same time, the amount of capital that will actually return to digital assets remains uncertain.

The third scenario is a return of retail investor attention. If interest shifts from AI-related stocks, rare earth metals, or quantum technologies back to the crypto industry, it could bring fresh capital inflows and stablecoin issuance. Wintermute called this option the least likely, but one that could significantly broaden market participation.

As a reminder, BitMEX co-founder and Maelstrom fund CIO Arthur Hayes shares a similar view on the four-year cycle being outdated. According to him, monetary policy and global financial conditions will shape market dynamics in the coming years.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37