World Liberty Financial faced renewed scrutiny after the USD1 proposal passed through governance despite restricted participation. The vote advanced while many WLFI holders remained unable to access locked tokens. Critics argued that USD1 now sits at the center of decisions that reduce token holder influence.
The governance outcome pushed the USD1 plan forward and highlighted the voting imbalance within the WLFI structure. The largest wallets cast decisive votes and shifted the final tally with concentrated power. Furthermore, onchain data suggested that team-linked and partner-linked wallets controlled most voting weight.
The top nine wallets accounted for nearly 59% of total power and secured the USD1 proposal’s approval. They shaped the final outcome and overshadowed the votes of smaller participants. The largest wallet represented more than 18% of the voting snapshot.
Many WLFI holders stayed locked since the token generation event and could not participate. Their allocations remained inaccessible and restricted by project rules. Critics argued that these holders could not influence decisions affecting USD1 expansion.
The USD1 roadmap increased concerns about WLFI’s benefits and long-term structure. Critics questioned why governance advanced USD1 growth instead of prioritizing unlock mechanisms for WLFI. They argued that USD1 incentives could draw from treasury assets rather than WLFI emissions.
Background documents indicated that revenue distribution excludes WLFI holders completely. The Gold Paper stated that protocol revenue flows to Trump-linked and Witkoff-linked entities. Thus, attention turned to whether the USD1 proposal strengthens internal interests rather than WLFI’s ecosystem.
WLFI holds a treasury of major digital assets including Bitcoin, Ether, and Chainlink. These assets have grown under previous strategies and remain controlled by the project. WLFI holders gain no direct participation from these reserves, which fueled frustration around the USD1 expansion.
Large transfers occurred after the vote and signaled new activity around WLFI circulation. A transaction of 500 million WLFI moved to Jump Trading and intensified debate around emissions. Critics stated that locked holders still lacked clarity about future access to their tokens.
WLFI allocated 33.5% of supply to the team and 5.85% to partners. These groups secured significant influence in governance and shaped USD1 alignment strategies. The public sale accounted for a smaller share and held limited voting impact.
The market reacted to increasing WLFI emissions and ongoing USD1 expansion efforts. Participants expressed concern about long-term dilution and structural extraction claims. As a result, projections suggested continued downward pressure on WLFI as the USD1 agenda advances.
The post USD1 Growth Proposal Triggers Claims of WLFI Value Extraction appeared first on CoinCentral.


