The post Strategy manager wrong about BTC backing STRC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A manager at Michael Saylor’s Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) postedThe post Strategy manager wrong about BTC backing STRC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A manager at Michael Saylor’s Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) posted

Strategy manager wrong about BTC backing STRC

A manager at Michael Saylor’s Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) posted a claim to social media that the company’s STRC stock enjoys coverage by its bitcoin (BTC) collateral.

According to Chaitanya Jain, STRC relies on Strategy common stock for its bitcoin (BTC) “over-collateralization.”

A tweet posted by Jain at 9:02pm New York time on January 20 read, “$MSTR needs $STRC for $BTC amplification. $STRC needs $MSTR for $BTC over-collateralization.”

However, this is incorrect.

Indeed, there’s widespread misinformation and considerable confusion about the supposed BTC backing of Strategy’s various types of stock: MSTR, STRK, STRD, STRF, and STRC.

The fact is, BTC doesn’t collateralize any of Strategy’s publicly traded equities.

‘Not collateralized by the company’s BTC holdings’

The company has repeatedly disclosed that ownership of its securities “are not collateralized by the company’s BTC holdings.”

“Ownership of common stock does not represent an ownership interest in the BTC the company holds,” the company has stated in multiple SEC filings.

Nevertheless, Strategy and Saylor often tread dangerously close to the line. They regularly speak of BPS (BTC per share) of common stock, as well as BTC “coverage” of dividend payments.

Far from casual asides, these terms are key performance indicators and feature in quarterly earnings.

In its 2025 third quarter presentation, for example, the company published a claim that two of its preferred shares have “collateral coverage” as well as a “BTC rating” on the same slides.

This BTC rating divides the company’s BTC by the sum of those preferreds’ notional values and all shorter-duration/senior instruments.

Moreover, Strategy has tweeted that the company’s BTC holdings provide 71 years of dividend “coverage.” 

Finally, Saylor has broadcasted messages for months about STRC competing with bank accounts, money markets, and even annuities, even though STRC derives almost all of its value from BTC.

“Everybody in the world would love to have a high yield bank account that yielded 10%,” Saylor has repeatedly said in reference to STRC and its so-called BTC rating.

Read more: The math behind MicroStrategy’s bitcoin bet

In other words, Strategy’s leadership repeatedly uses words that could confuse a regular person as to whether its BTC covers or collateralizes the company’s equities, while simultaneously disclaiming that it does.

Younger and less senior workers, such as Jain, apparently still get confused.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/strategy-manager-wrong-about-btc-backing-strc/

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$89,420.98
$89,420.98$89,420.98
-0.96%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Ripple (XRP) CEO Brad Garlinghouse Makes Another Statement Regarding the Anticipated US Cryptocurrency Legislation

Ripple (XRP) CEO Brad Garlinghouse Makes Another Statement Regarding the Anticipated US Cryptocurrency Legislation

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, in his latest statement, once again expressed his support for the cryptocurrency legislation being debated in the US. Continue Reading
Share
Coinstats2026/01/22 05:30
Trump Dismisses Stock Market Dip as Minor While Solana and XRP Stand to Gain

Trump Dismisses Stock Market Dip as Minor While Solana and XRP Stand to Gain

Trump calls stock market dip “peanuts” and predicts big gains for Solana and XRP, despite recent market volatility and geopolitical tensions. President Donald Trump
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/01/22 06:00