The Central Bank of Iran (CBI) acquired at least $507 million in the US dollar-backed stablecoin USDT and used it to bypass global sanctions, according to a n The Central Bank of Iran (CBI) acquired at least $507 million in the US dollar-backed stablecoin USDT and used it to bypass global sanctions, according to a n

How Iran’s Central Bank Used USDT to Bypass Sanctions and Support Its Currency

The Central Bank of Iran (CBI) acquired at least $507 million in the US dollar-backed stablecoin USDT and used it to bypass global sanctions, according to a new investigation by blockchain analytics firm Elliptic.

The report provides a detailed, real-world case study of how a sanctioned state is using digital assets to create a “shadow financial layer” outside the traditional banking system.

For brokers and financial institutions, the findings underscore the compliance risks — as well as the enforcement mechanisms — associated with stablecoins.

A Dual-Purpose Financial Tool

According to Elliptic, which mapped the CBI’s wallet infrastructure using leaked documents, Iran’s central bank appears to have used USDT for two primary purposes: domestic FX intervention and sanctions-resistant trade settlement.

On-chain data shows that until June 2025, the CBI systematically sent large amounts of USDT to Nobitex, Iran’s largest cryptocurrency exchange. Elliptic suggests this was intended to inject US dollar liquidity into the local market to support the Iranian rial during a period of severe economic volatility.

At the same time, the report says the authorities accumulated USDT to create what it describes as “digital off-book eurodollar accounts.” This shadow infrastructure enabled a closed-loop trade settlement system in which import payments and export revenues could be settled in a synthetic US dollar equivalent, reducing exposure to asset seizure through conventional banking channels.

The CBI’s operational approach shifted abruptly in June 2025. Following a hack of the Nobitex exchange by a pro-Israel group that labelled the platform a “sanctions violation tool,” the central bank stopped routing funds through the exchange.

Instead, it began using cross-chain bridges and decentralised exchanges to move and obscure its assets, reflecting a rapid adjustment to emerging security risks.

  • Report: Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Moved $1 Billion Through UK Crypto Exchanges
  • Wall Street Braced for Iranian-Linked Cyber Attacks

The Double-Edged Sword of Transparency

Although the activity was intended to evade restrictions, Elliptic notes that it was not invisible. Stablecoins operate on public blockchains, allowing analytics firms to trace transaction flows even when intermediaries are avoided. The investigation also highlights the enforcement leverage held by stablecoin issuers.

On June 15, 2025, Tether blacklisted several wallets linked to the CBI, freezing approximately $37 million in USDT. The episode illustrates the double-edged nature of stablecoins for sanctioned actors. While they can be used to bypass parts of the traditional banking system, they also introduce a centralised point of control.

Unlike decentralised assets such as Bitcoin, stablecoin issuers can disable wallets and halt transactions. For financial institutions, the case serves as a clear warning. As digital assets become more embedded in global finance, compliance obligations expand with them.

The combination of blockchain transparency, issuer controls, and third-party analytics means that even state-level attempts to evade sanctions can be monitored and, in some cases, disrupted.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Zwitserse bankgigant UBS wil crypto beleggen mogelijk maken

Zwitserse bankgigant UBS wil crypto beleggen mogelijk maken

De grootste vermogensbeheerder ter wereld, UBS, maakt zich op om een stap te zetten richting crypto. Volgens bronnen binnen de bank kijkt het Zwitserse concern
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 02:48
Trump Nears Decision on New Federal Reserve Chair

Trump Nears Decision on New Federal Reserve Chair

The post Trump Nears Decision on New Federal Reserve Chair appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Trump nears decision on Federal Reserve Chair, evaluating
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/24 02:53