The post F/m Seeks SEC Approval to Tokenize Shares of $6B Treasury ETF TBIL appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. F/m Investments asked the United States SecuritiesThe post F/m Seeks SEC Approval to Tokenize Shares of $6B Treasury ETF TBIL appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. F/m Investments asked the United States Securities

F/m Seeks SEC Approval to Tokenize Shares of $6B Treasury ETF TBIL

F/m Investments asked the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to allow it to tokenize shares of its flagship Treasury exchange-traded fund (ETF).

The $18 billion asset manager filed Wednesday for exemptive relief to let the F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) record ownership of its roughly $6 billion in shares on a permissioned blockchain, while remaining a standard 1940 Act exchange‑traded fund.

In its press release, F/m describes the filing as the “first of its kind” from an ETF issuer seeking US regulatory relief specifically for tokenized shares of a registered investment company.

The company said the onchain representation would use the same Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures number, and carry the same rights, fees, voting power and economic terms as TBIL shares today, effectively making tokenization just another way to record who owns the shares, rather than a separate new asset.

A broader tokenization trend in traditional funds

F/m’s approach closely tracks recent experiments by Franklin Templeton, a major US asset manager that has launched blockchain‑enabled US government money market funds and other tokenization pilots, moving share ownership records for its onchain US government money market fund to a public blockchain while keeping the product under the Investment Company Act.

Related: State Street rolls out new crypto tokenization tools

In F/m’s case, tokenization would be layered onto a listed Treasury ETF rather than a money market mutual fund, potentially widening the universe of token‑enabled, regulated fixed‑income products.

F/m Investments’ SEC filing. Source: SEC

The company contrasts its model with “stablecoins or unregistered digital tokens,” emphasizing that TBIL’s tokenized shares would still be subject to independent board oversight, daily portfolio transparency, third‑party custody and audit, and the broader protections of 1940 Act funds.

If the SEC grants the requested relief, F/m says TBIL would be able to support both traditional brokerage rails and digital-native, “token-aware” platforms through a single share class, without changing its investment objective or portfolio.

​The application came just days after the New York Stock Exchange unveiled plans for a new venue aimed at 24/7 trading and onchain settlement of tokenized stocks and ETFs, as tokenization shifts from pilots to mainstream markets.

Cointelegraph reached out to F/m Investments for additional comment, but had not received a response by publication.

Magazine: Kevin O’Leary says quantum attacking Bitcoin would be a waste of time

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/18b-investment-firm-f-m-tokenize-shares-etf?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.