TLDR Nasdaq filed with the SEC to remove the 25,000-contract limit on options for Bitcoin and Ether ETFs from major issuers including BlackRock, Fidelity, and GrayscaleTLDR Nasdaq filed with the SEC to remove the 25,000-contract limit on options for Bitcoin and Ether ETFs from major issuers including BlackRock, Fidelity, and Grayscale

Nasdaq Files to Remove Position Limits on Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF Options

2026/01/23 16:37
3 min read

TLDR

  • Nasdaq filed with the SEC to remove the 25,000-contract limit on options for Bitcoin and Ether ETFs from major issuers including BlackRock, Fidelity, and Grayscale
  • The SEC waived the 30-day waiting period and made the rule change effective immediately on January 22, though it can still suspend the change within 60 days
  • The change aims to treat crypto ETF options the same as other commodity-based fund options that have no position limits
  • BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) options currently rank 11th in US market open interest with over 5.3 million contracts
  • The SEC will accept public comments and make a final decision by late February

Nasdaq has submitted a proposal to the Securities and Exchange Commission to eliminate trading restrictions on options tied to spot Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds. The filing removes contract caps that previously limited how many options traders could hold.

The rule change affects options on Bitcoin and Ether ETFs from BlackRock, Fidelity, Bitwise, Grayscale, ARK/21Shares, and VanEck. All products are listed on the Nasdaq exchange and were subject to a 25,000-contract limit.

Nasdaq filed the proposal on January 7. The SEC waived its standard 30-day waiting period and made the change effective on January 22.

The regulatory agency can still suspend the rule within 60 days if it decides further review is needed. A comment period is now open with a final determination expected by late February.

Options are contracts that give traders the right to buy or sell an asset at a set price before a specific date. Exchanges impose limits on options to reduce speculation risks and prevent market manipulation.

Nasdaq argues the change creates equal treatment across different asset classes. The exchange wants to handle digital assets the same way it handles all other qualifying options.

Regulatory Framework and Market Impact

The proposal builds on Nasdaq’s earlier approval in late 2025 to list options on single-asset crypto ETFs as commodity-based trusts. That approval allowed Bitcoin and Ether ETF options to trade but kept position and exercise limits in place.

Nasdaq stated the change promotes fair trading principles and supports an open market. The exchange claims the rule imposes no burden on competition and protects investors.

Similar changes are expected across other options exchanges. The uniform approach would standardize how crypto ETF options are treated compared to traditional commodity funds.

In November, Nasdaq had filed a separate proposal to raise position limits on BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) options from 250,000 contracts to 1 million. That filing cited growing demand and argued the cap limited hedging strategies.

Current Market Data

BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) options currently rank 11th among US assets by options open interest. The fund has over 5.3 million in open interest according to OpenCharts data.

IBIT options rank below gold and silver ETFs in the current market environment. Bitcoin ETFs have seen outflows totaling $1.58 billion over the past three days.

BlackRock’s IBIT led withdrawals with $356.6 million in redemptions. Fidelity’s FBTC saw $287.7 million in outflows during the same period.

Bitcoin traded near $90,000 as of the latest data, up 1% in 24 hours. Ethereum also gained 1% to trade at $3,000 after falling more than 11% over the previous week.

The Nasdaq filing represents the latest step in expanding crypto market infrastructure. The exchange has been increasing its role in digital assets through various initiatives including tokenized equities and unified crypto indexes.

The post Nasdaq Files to Remove Position Limits on Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF Options appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16