Over the years, a long list of candidates have used anxiety over the economy to their political advantage in the United States' presidential races — from DemocratOver the years, a long list of candidates have used anxiety over the economy to their political advantage in the United States' presidential races — from Democrat

America 'hurtling out of control' as Trump’s 'chaos' intensifies: analysis

Over the years, a long list of candidates have used anxiety over the economy to their political advantage in the United States' presidential races — from Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1932 to Republican Ronald Reagan in 1980 to Democrat Bill Clinton in 1992. It was during the 1992 race, in fact, that Democratic strategist James Carville made the phrase, "It's the economy, stupid" famous.

Carville's messaging helped doom President George H.W. Bush's reelection hopes. After the Persian Gulf War, Bush's approval ratings were so high that he seemed destined for a massive reelection victory. But Clinton, with Carville's help, hammered Bush relentlessly on the early 1990s recession and defeated him, 370-168, in the Electoral College and by roughly 5.5 percent in the national popular vote.

Carville, 34 years later, is still reminding Americans that "it's the economy, stupid" and encouraging Democrats to bring a strong economic message to the 2026 midterms.

Salon's Heather Digby Parton agrees that Democrats need aggressive economic messaging in the midterms. But in an article published on January 23, she stresses that they also need to tie the economy into a broad argument against the "chaos and fear" that President Donald Trump is generating.

"However Democratic congressional candidates ultimately decide to approach this," Parton argues, "they simply cannot behave as if we are living through a time of politics as usual. A Republican majority that is allowing Trump to use tariffs as a weapon that hurts average Americans, occupy American cities with paramilitary forces, brutalize immigrants, depose foreign leaders, threaten allies, blackmail law firms and universities, defund science and education, and essentially tear up the Constitution — all in order to appease a tyrant — is simply not something they can ignore. Democrats can't pretend the only thing that matters is the economy."

The Salon journalist continues, "All of those are now kitchen table issues. People know that things are hurtling out of control, and they're talking about it. They're taking to the streets to protest in their own neighborhoods and in huge numbers all over the country. If voters aren't laying out that whole panoply of atrocities to pollsters and canvassers, it's not because they aren't feeling it — it's because they're terrified by the apparent impotence of everyone with any power to stop it."

Democrats, Parton stresses, must make the midterms a referendum on Trump's second presidency and show voters why other Republicans are partly to blame for his policies.

"According to the latest CNN poll," Parton explains, "58 percent of Americans say Trump's first year back in office has been an abject failure. The number one job for Democratic candidates is to make it clear to the American people that every single member of the Republican Party is complicit in everything he is doing — and the only way to fix that is to elect a Democratic Congress to fulfill its constitutional duty as a co-equal branch of government. From the looks of the latest polling, that's fundamentally what people want from the Democrats right now — and it shouldn't be too difficult to make the case that they’re prepared and equipped to make that happen."

Heather Digby Parton's full article for Salon is available at this link.

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Zwitserse bankgigant UBS wil crypto beleggen mogelijk maken

Zwitserse bankgigant UBS wil crypto beleggen mogelijk maken

De grootste vermogensbeheerder ter wereld, UBS, maakt zich op om een stap te zetten richting crypto. Volgens bronnen binnen de bank kijkt het Zwitserse concern
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 02:48
Trump Nears Decision on New Federal Reserve Chair

Trump Nears Decision on New Federal Reserve Chair

The post Trump Nears Decision on New Federal Reserve Chair appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Trump nears decision on Federal Reserve Chair, evaluating
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/24 02:53