Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has changed a position he held since 2017, now backing full blockchain verification by users, which he previously dismissed. He attributes this change to breakthroughs in zero-knowledge cryptography, especially zk-SNARKs, which allow users to validate chain state without rerunning entire transaction histories. The shift signals Ethereum’s deeper commitment to self-sovereignty and cryptographic security, especially as it faces real-world infrastructure risks.
Vitalik Buterin publicly withdrew his 2017 view that full blockchain verification by users was a “weird mountain man fantasy.” In a recent post on X, he said his earlier stance no longer holds due to technological progress and practical concerns. He admitted his past position was based on idealized assumptions that real-world blockchain usage has disproven.
At the time, Buterin favored storing full state on-chain over offloading it and reconstructing it locally, which he deemed inefficient. He argued such designs would force users to rely on centralized RPC services or reprocess the entire transaction history. Instead, Ethereum used Merkle proofs and anchored state roots in block headers.
Buterin said this setup balanced decentralization with efficiency, though it limited full independence for everyday users. He previously called full verification impractical unless Ethereum severely constrained its capacity. Now, he says that constraint is no longer necessary.
Buterin credited zk-SNARKs for enabling Ethereum to offer full verification without overwhelming users with computation. These proofs allow verification of computation without revealing underlying data or rerunning calculations.
Ethereum’s roadmap now features zk-SNARKs and rollups prominently, especially for reducing fees and scaling the network securely. Rollups like zkSync, Scroll, and StarkNet all rely on these cryptographic systems. They batch transactions and publish a single proof to Ethereum, improving throughput.
Each system balances trade-offs differently, including cost, transparency, and proof size, based on the cryptographic model used. Buterin acknowledged these trade-offs but emphasized their net benefit. He sees them as resolving issues that previously required uncomfortable compromises.
Buterin pointed to ongoing network issues like service shutdowns and latency as reasons to reduce reliance on intermediaries. He said centralized infrastructure often becomes a single point of failure under pressure. That reality, he added, supports giving users tools for full self-validation.
He metaphorically described the fallback option as the “mountain man’s cabin” that functions when all else fails. He now believes that this option must be available for all users, not just experts. His renewed stance comes as Ethereum adopts cryptography to ensure resilience.
Ethereum’s developers have begun removing legacy design features that hinder zk adoption, including the modular exponentiation precompile. Buterin introduced that feature years ago, but now says it slows zk proof generation. In late 2025, he proposed its removal to improve efficiency.
He also said some early assumptions in Ethereum’s architecture no longer align with current cryptographic capabilities. Ethereum now seeks to upgrade its protocol to support native zk functionality. Community proposals have also explored zk-proofs for data protection compliance.
In mid-2025, contributors suggested zk methods could align Ethereum with European data protection rules by hiding personal data off-chain. Validators could still verify data integrity without viewing its contents, using zk-SNARKs. This approach could limit regulatory friction while preserving privacy.
The post Vitalik Buterin U-Turns on Blockchain Validation After ZK-SNARK Rise appeared first on CoinCentral.


