The post Bitcoin Options Expiry Exposes Bearish Edge Below $90,000 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Bitcoin price traded near $89,000 as $10.8The post Bitcoin Options Expiry Exposes Bearish Edge Below $90,000 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Bitcoin price traded near $89,000 as $10.8

Bitcoin Options Expiry Exposes Bearish Edge Below $90,000

5 min read

Key Insights:

  • Bitcoin price traded near $89,000 as $10.8 billion BTC options expiry approached on Jan. 30.
  • Put options outweighed calls below $90,000, giving bears a clear mathematical edge.
  • On-chain data showed rising supply in losses, hinting at an early bear-market structure.

Bitcoin price hovered near $89,000 as traders braced for a $10.8 billion Bitcoin options expiry on Jan. 30. Despite repeated rebounds from $87,000, derivatives data showed bears held a clear edge below $90,000. Options positioning suggested limited conviction behind a breakout toward $95,000.

The Bitcoin options expiry mattered because it tested whether recent price stability reflected strength or hesitation. Data from Deribit showed call options dominated open interest, yet strike placement told a different story. Below $90,000, bearish strategies remained better positioned mathematically.

Bitcoin Options Positioning Favored Bears Below Key Levels

Deribit data showed $6.6 billion in call options open interest versus $4.2 billion in puts. At face value, calls exceeded puts by 57%, but strike distribution weakened that signal. Less than 17% of Jan. 30 call interest sat below $92,500, limiting bullish exposure near current prices.

Bitcoin Options Open Interest Clusters Near $100,000 | Source: Derbit

Bitcoin price traded as low as $84,000 over the past two months, according to market data. Calls at $70,000 and below likely reflected complex hedging structures rather than outright upside bets. Deribit pricing showed that such deep out-of-the-money calls remained costly for directional traders.

A $70,000 Bitcoin call expiring Feb. 27 traded near 0.212 Bitcoin, Deribit data showed. By contrast, an $80,000 call cost roughly 0.109 Bitcoin. This gap explained why traders preferred strikes closer to spot rather than deep discounts.

Calls at $110,000 and higher traded below 0.002 Bitcoin, or about $180. Such contracts attracted little interest due to low probability payouts. Analysts typically viewed them as speculative or part of covered call strategies rather than bullish conviction.

Covered Calls Skewed Bullish Appearances

A large share of calls above $100,000 reflected covered call strategies, according to derivatives data. In these trades, sellers collected premiums while holding underlying Bitcoin. Profit upside remained capped, reducing their value as bullish indicators.

Deep Out-of-the-Money Bitcoin Calls Priced Aggressively | Source: Derbit

Deribit showed $850 million in call interest clustered between $75,000 and $92,000. To assess control into expiry, traders compared this with put exposure near current prices. Put options often revealed downside hedging or neutral positioning.

Put open interest between $86,000 and $100,000 totaled $1.2 billion on Deribit. Even excluding puts above $102,000, bearish exposure outweighed bullish payoff scenarios below $90,000. This imbalance shaped expectations into the expiry window.

Scenario modeling reinforced the bearish skew. Between $86,000 and $88,000, puts held a $775 million advantage. Between $88,001 and $90,000, bears still led by $325 million, according to Deribit estimates.

Only above $90,001 did calls gain a net edge, totaling $220 million. As long as Bitcoin price remained below $90,000, options math favored sellers. Traders closely watched spot price behavior as settlement approached.

Supply in Loss Metric Turned Higher

On-chain data added pressure to the cautious outlook. Bitcoin’s Supply in Loss percentage began trending upward again, according to historical cycle data. Analysts noted similar shifts preceded bear market phases in 2014, 2018, and 2022.

Bitcoin Supply in Loss | Source: CryptoQuant

In prior cycles, Supply in Loss rose before price reached final bottoms. Losses gradually spread from short-term holders to longer-term participants. True market lows formed only after broader capitulation emerged.

Current readings remained well below historical capitulation levels. Still, analysts said the directional change carried weight. The metric suggested a transition toward bear market structure rather than a brief pullback.

This interpretation aligned with muted upside conviction in options markets. Traders appeared reluctant to chase higher strikes while hedging downside risks. The combination pointed to caution rather than panic.

Binance Fund Flow Ratio Showed No Panic Selling

Exchange flow data offered a counterbalance to bearish signals. Binance’s Fund Flow Ratio hovered near 0.016, according to on-chain analytics. Historically, higher readings coincided with market tops or sharp corrections.

Bitcoin Fund Flow Ratio | Source: CryptoQuant

The low ratio indicated limited Bitcoin inflows to exchanges relative to network activity. Analysts said this behavior suggested an absence of widespread selling intent. Large holders appeared content to wait rather than distribute aggressively.

Bitcoin traded near $89,000 despite the subdued flow ratio. Past market peaks showed sharp increases as assets moved rapidly toward exchanges. The current pattern reflected controlled supply conditions.

Analysts also linked the ratio to liquidity absorption. Reduced inflows implied constrained immediate sell-side supply. Without new catalysts, the probability of a sharp near-term decline appeared limited.

As the Bitcoin options expiry approached, price levels took center stage. Below $90,000, bearish strategies retained a measurable edge. A sustained move above that level shifted payoff dynamics toward call holders.

The $87,000 zone remained a key support, having absorbed multiple pullbacks over two months. Failure to hold that range risked validating bearish options positioning. Above $92,000, bullish exposure increased but lacked depth.

Traders watched the settlement closely for directional cues. Bitcoin options outcomes, on-chain metrics, and exchange flows painted a market marked by restraint rather than momentum. For now, Bitcoin’s next move hinged on whether the spot price could escape the $90,000 ceiling.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2026/01/28/bitcoin-options-expiry-exposes-bearish-edge-below-90000/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15