Amid evolving token economics in crypto, the newly approved Optimism buybacks program marks a key shift in how sequencer revenue supports the Superchain ecosystem.
The Optimism Collective has passed a 12-month program that directs 50% of Superchain revenue into monthly OP buybacks, with 84.4% support in the governance vote. The initiative, which begins with January’s revenue in February, transforms OP from a pure governance asset into a token explicitly tied to sequencer income across multiple chains.
Under the plan, OP becomes linked to sequencer revenue generated on Base, Unichain, Ink, World Chain, Soneium, and OP Mainnet. Moreover, this creates a direct connection between on-chain activity and demand for the token, embedding economic alignment across the Superchain’s partners.
Over the past twelve months, participating chains contributed 5,868 ETH in sequencer fees to a treasury managed by Optimism governance. Based on that figure, the program would initially deploy around 2.7k ETH into OP purchases, equal to roughly $8 million at current prices, executed via an OTC provider in the open market.
Purchased tokens will be returned to the collective treasury. However, they will not have a fixed end use. They may eventually be burned, distributed as staking rewards, or redeployed for ecosystem expansion as the platform and its capital strategy evolve.
The Optimism Foundation will partner with an OTC desk to handle monthly ETH-to-OP conversions under predetermined execution windows. Starting in February, each month will use the previous month’s revenue, with trades executed regardless of price, subject to maximum fee spreads and operational constraints.
If monthly revenue drops below $200,000, conversions pause. That said, any skipped allocation will roll into the next month, preserving the intended annual buyback size while smoothing short-term volatility in revenue or liquidity. Conversions will also halt if the OTC partner cannot operate within the agreed fee limits.
For transparency, all trades will be reported through Optimism’s stats dashboard or the governance forum. In addition, the Foundation will maintain a foundation execution dashboard to track fills, pacing, pricing, and treasury balances so that delegates and tokenholders can monitor activity in near real time.
The remaining 50% of ETH revenue will stay discretionary. It can be deployed for development, ecosystem incentives, and shared infrastructure across more than 30 Superchain partners. Moreover, this structure aims to reduce governance overhead that has historically limited active treasury management by requiring new votes for each capital decision.
While the initial deployment is modest in size, it is designed to scale alongside Superchain growth. As every transaction on participating chains increases sequencer fees, it also expands the base for Superchain revenue buybacks, creating structural demand for OP that tracks the network’s usage.
The mechanism operates entirely on collected sequencer revenue from the chains that contributed the full 5,868 ETH over the past year. This anchors the buyback capacity in realized, on-chain fee income rather than speculative projections or future token sales.
Optimism Foundation Executive Director Bobby Dresser described the approval as a key moment in the evolution of OP’s economic role. The program, he argued, marks a deliberate move from pure governance toward a token design that participates more directly in the network’s financial success.
“Governance approval of the op buyback proposal marks an exciting first step in expanding the role of the OP token,” Dresser said. “Optimism’s OP Stack is becoming the settlement layer for the next generation of financial systems, and this program will help align the OP token’s value with the success of the Superchain ecosystem.”
Dresser outlined the strategy behind this shift in detail. “The goal of this proposal is to align the OP token directly with the success of the Superchain. Optimism earns real, growing revenue from Superchain usage, but historically, the OP token has only been used for governance. Buybacks create a direct link between Superchain demand and OP, making OP the shared instrument of the ecosystem.”
When asked what success would look like at the end of the 12-month period, Dresser pointed to durable infrastructure rather than short-term market moves. Moreover, he emphasized that governance will ultimately decide whether to extend the mechanism.
“Success to us means building an ecosystem that will last, which means putting the right infrastructure in place to create a new paradigm for Optimism and the OP token. Ultimately, the governance community will decide if this should become a long-term mechanism,” he noted.
The initiative also follows prior public communication from the project. On January 8, 2026, a contributor posting as Optimist Prime referenced the planned buyback in a tweet, framing it as a way to unify the broader ecosystem and shift focus to what comes next for crypto.
Despite its eventual approval, the proposal triggered a substantive governance debate. Some delegates objected to combining the buyback authorization with expanded Foundation discretion over treasury operations in a single decision, arguing that each policy deserved an independent vote.
GFXlabs was among the most vocal critics of the bundled design. The group warned that delegates might support broader treasury management powers primarily because they anticipated positive price effects from the buybacks, complicating clear evaluation of each measure on its own merits.
Concerns also centered on the otc eth to op execution strategy. However, critics argued that off-chain trades reduce transparency, introduce potential corruption risks, and may signal that Optimism’s own DeFi infrastructure cannot support basic spot execution for its governance token under real market conditions.
Some community members suggested that on-chain transactions would better reflect the network’s decentralized ethos. They argued that routing buybacks through Optimism-based protocols could distribute fees to local liquidity providers and maintain end-to-end visibility into execution quality and slippage.
Despite these reservations, the measure advanced through Special Voting Cycle #47 under Joint House approval. It cleared the required 60% support threshold, enabling immediate implementation of the buyback plan and related treasury processes under the constraints described in the proposal.
During the initial phase, the Foundation will handle implementation under fixed parameters that leave little room for discretionary deviation. That said, the program is expected to migrate increasingly on-chain over time via Protocol Upgrade 18, which will ensure that all sequencer revenue from OP Chains is collected without direct Foundation intervention.
The launch of the optimism buybacks program comes as token repurchase mechanisms spread across the crypto market. Many projects now use revenue, protocol fees, or burn schedules to influence circulating supply and attempt to align token value with network performance.
Results across the sector, however, have been mixed. While some repurchase or burn models have supported stronger price dynamics, others have found that new issuance, vesting unlocks, or weak demand can overpower the effects of even large buyback programs over time.
For Optimism, the announced framework is positioned as the first phase in a longer op token evolution. Rather than promising immediate price appreciation, the Foundation has emphasized aligning incentives around sequencer revenue mechanism design, treasury transparency, and a durable connection between Superchain usage and OP’s role in the ecosystem.
As the 12-month program unfolds, the governance community will be able to assess whether linking fee revenue, treasury activity, and market purchases delivers the intended benefits. Ultimately, that assessment will determine if the buyback model becomes a permanent fixture of the Optimism economic architecture.
In summary, the new revenue-backed buyback plan embeds OP more deeply into Superchain economics, while leaving key questions about execution, transparency, and long-term effectiveness to be answered through real-world performance and future governance decisions.


