White House Steps In as Stablecoin Reward War Puts U.S. Crypto Law on the Brink

Why the White House Crypto Meeting Could Unlock the CLARITY Act

The United States government is preparing for a pivotal moment in its long-running effort to regulate the digital asset industry. On Monday, February 2, 2026, senior officials from the White House will meet with executives from major banks and leading crypto companies in what officials privately describe as an urgent attempt to rescue the stalled CLARITY Act.

The high-level meeting, organized by the President’s Crypto Policy Council, reflects growing concern inside Washington that the country is running out of time to establish a coherent legal framework for digital assets. Without action, policymakers fear the United States could fall further behind other financial hubs that have already implemented clearer crypto regulations.

At the heart of the impasse is a dispute over stablecoins and how they interact with the traditional banking system. The disagreement has become so intense that it recently derailed progress on the CLARITY Act in the Senate, despite broad bipartisan support for clearer crypto rules.

What the CLARITY Act Is Designed to Do

The CLARITY Act is widely viewed as the most comprehensive attempt yet to define how digital assets should be regulated in the United States. Its core purpose is to establish clear boundaries between regulatory agencies, particularly the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Source: X(formerly Twitter)

For years, crypto companies have complained that overlapping authority and inconsistent enforcement have created uncertainty, discouraging investment and innovation. The CLARITY Act aims to resolve that confusion by clearly defining which digital assets fall under securities law and which are treated as commodities.

In addition, the bill seeks to create standardized compliance requirements for exchanges, custodians, and issuers, offering companies a predictable path to operate legally within the U.S. financial system.

Why the Bill Hit a Roadblock

Despite its broad appeal, the CLARITY Act encountered a major obstacle tied to stablecoins. The conflict centers on how digital dollar tokens are allowed to generate and distribute returns to users.

Under an earlier proposal known as the GENIUS Act, stablecoin issuers were explicitly prohibited from paying interest or yield in a manner similar to bank deposits. That restriction was designed to protect traditional banks from losing customers and deposits.

However, the CLARITY Act includes a provision that allows crypto platforms to share profits earned from reserve assets with users in the form of rewards. While not technically labeled as interest, these rewards could function similarly from a consumer’s perspective.

This distinction has triggered intense opposition from the banking industry.

Banks Warn of a Deposit Drain

Traditional banks argue that allowing stablecoin-related rewards creates unfair competition. They contend that crypto firms would be able to offer returns without being subject to the same regulatory burdens, capital requirements, and insurance obligations as banks.

A recent report by Standard Chartered has amplified those concerns. According to the analysis, widespread adoption of yield-generating stablecoins could draw nearly $500 billion out of U.S. bank deposits by 2028.

For large institutions, such a shift would be disruptive. For smaller regional and community banks, it could be existential. These banks rely heavily on deposits to fund lending, particularly in local economies.

Banking lobbyists are pushing aggressively to close what they describe as a loophole in the CLARITY Act before it becomes law.

Crypto Industry Pushback

Crypto industry leaders argue that banning rewards would stifle innovation and place U.S.-based companies at a disadvantage compared to their global competitors.

Executives, including Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, have publicly stated that restricting stablecoin rewards would undermine consumer choice and limit the ability of crypto platforms to offer efficient financial products.

From the industry’s perspective, stablecoins represent a technological improvement over traditional banking rails. They allow faster settlement, lower costs, and global accessibility. Supporters argue that sharing reserve profits with users is a natural extension of these efficiencies, not a threat to financial stability.

The Role of the White House

The White House’s decision to convene an emergency-style meeting underscores the political importance of the issue. The administration has signaled that it wants to secure a major crypto policy win ahead of the 2026 elections.

The meeting will be led by key figures including David Sacks, often referred to as the White House’s AI and Crypto Czar, and Patrick Witt, director of the President’s Digital Asset Council. Their role is to mediate between two powerful industries with competing interests.

Officials close to the process say the goal is not to fully satisfy either side, but to reach a compromise that allows the CLARITY Act to move forward.

The Three Core Issues on the Table

Several themes are expected to dominate the discussions.

First is the question of rewards. Banks are demanding a blanket ban on any third-party incentives tied to stablecoins. Crypto firms are seeking flexibility to continue offering value to users.

Second is competition. Crypto advocates argue that preventing rewards would entrench traditional banking advantages and slow technological progress.

Third is the cost of inaction. Both sides acknowledge that the absence of clear rules has led to regulatory uncertainty, costly lawsuits, and the migration of innovation to overseas jurisdictions.

Searching for a Middle Ground

Policy experts suggest that a compromise may involve placing limits on stablecoin rewards rather than banning them outright. For example, rewards could be capped, restricted to certain types of users, or subject to additional disclosure requirements.

David Sacks has hinted that any viable solution will involve concessions. In recent remarks, he noted that successful compromises often leave all parties slightly dissatisfied.

For crypto firms, that may mean accepting restrictions in exchange for long-sought regulatory clarity. For banks, it could mean acknowledging that some level of competition from digital assets is inevitable.

What Happens if Talks Fail

The stakes of the February 2 meeting are high. If no agreement is reached, the CLARITY Act could remain stalled indefinitely.

In that scenario, analysts warn that crypto companies may increasingly operate around existing laws rather than within them. This could lead to the emergence of a fragmented, shadow financial system that regulators struggle to oversee.

Such an outcome would benefit neither industry nor consumers. It could increase systemic risk while pushing innovation further beyond U.S. borders.

Broader Implications for the U.S. Economy

Beyond crypto, the outcome of this debate could influence how the United States approaches financial innovation more broadly. Stablecoins are increasingly viewed as foundational infrastructure for tokenized assets, cross-border payments, and digital settlements.

A clear and balanced regulatory framework could position the U.S. as a leader in next-generation finance. Continued uncertainty, by contrast, risks ceding that role to jurisdictions with more decisive policies.

Conclusion

The White House crypto meeting represents a critical moment for U.S. digital asset regulation. By bringing banks and crypto leaders to the same table, the administration is signaling that the cost of delay has become too high.

Whether the CLARITY Act survives will depend on the ability of policymakers to bridge a deep divide over stablecoins and competition. If a compromise is reached, it could unlock the clearest crypto rules the U.S. has ever seen.

If not, the industry may face another year of legal ambiguity and missed opportunity, with consequences that extend far beyond crypto markets.

hokanews.com – Not Just Crypto News. It’s Crypto Culture.

Writer @Erlin
Erlin is an experienced crypto writer who loves to explore the intersection of blockchain technology and financial markets. She regularly provides insights into the latest trends and innovations in the digital currency space.
 
 Check out other news and articles on Google News

Disclaimer:

The articles published on hokanews are intended to provide up-to-date information on various topics, including cryptocurrency and technology news. The content on our site is not intended as an invitation to buy, sell, or invest in any assets. We encourage readers to conduct their own research and evaluation before making any investment or financial decisions.
hokanews is not responsible for any losses or damages that may arise from the use of information provided on this site. Investment decisions should be based on thorough research and advice from qualified financial advisors. Information on HokaNews may change without notice, and we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the content published.