Gold continues to surge to new highs while Bitcoin struggles to reclaim higher price levels, reinforcing a growing divergence across global markets. According toGold continues to surge to new highs while Bitcoin struggles to reclaim higher price levels, reinforcing a growing divergence across global markets. According to

Capital Rotation Intensifies As Bitcoin Lags Gold and US Equities

Gold continues to surge to new highs while Bitcoin struggles to reclaim higher price levels, reinforcing a growing divergence across global markets. According to a recent CryptoQuant report, the current investment landscape has become a tale of two worlds.

On one side, precious metals and US equities are attracting consistent inflows as investors seek assets with clearer momentum and perceived stability. On the other hand, Bitcoin is showing signs of fatigue, with on-chain data signaling that the market is losing strength rather than preparing for an immediate recovery.

CryptoQuant highlights a concerning confluence of indicators that suggests the crypto market is entering a more fragile phase. While price remains relatively elevated compared to historical bear market levels, underlying metrics point to weakening demand and diminishing participation from key market segments. This disconnect implies that Bitcoin’s struggle is not purely technical, but structural, rooted in shifting capital preferences and risk appetite.

The contrast is striking. As gold benefits from macro uncertainty and equity markets push higher on liquidity expectations, Bitcoin appears caught in consolidation, unable to attract the same conviction-driven flows. This growing divergence raises important questions about Bitcoin’s role in the current cycle and whether it can reassert itself as a competitive asset amid tightening conditions and changing investor behavior.

Institutional Exodus and Shrinking Liquidity Pressure

The report points to a clear institutional retreat that is weighing heavily on Bitcoin’s market structure. The Coinbase Premium Index, a key proxy for US institutional demand, remains deeply negative and recently reached a periodic low of -0.169%. This signals that selling pressure during US trading hours is materially stronger than the global average.

Notably, the index has turned positive only twice throughout January, reinforcing the view that institutions and high-net-worth participants are actively deleveraging rather than accumulating exposure. Historically, sustained negative premiums of this magnitude tend to coincide with phases of distribution, not early-stage recoveries.

Bitcoin Coinbase Premium Index | Source: CryptoQuant

Compounding this weakness is the evaporation of market “dry powder.” The combined market capitalization of the top 12 stablecoins has contracted by $2.24 billion recently, extending a peak-to-trough decline of roughly $5.6 billion.

This behavior differs from the typical rotation into stablecoins seen ahead of dip-buying phases. Instead, it reflects a more concerning dynamic: capital exiting the crypto ecosystem entirely and moving back into fiat. Without sidelined liquidity ready to re-enter, upside reactions become structurally weaker and short-lived.

Caught between institutional selling and shrinking liquidity, Bitcoin’s near-term bias remains skewed to the downside. In a bearish scenario, key levels to monitor include the True Mean Price near $81,000, the 2024 high around $70,000, and ultimately the 200-week moving average near $58,000.

Conversely, a bullish outcome would likely require an extended period of sideways consolidation, allowing overhead supply to be absorbed while stablecoin inflows recover and fresh capital gradually returns.

Bitcoin Remains Trapped Below Key Moving Averages

Bitcoin continues to trade under pressure, with the price hovering near the $88,000 area after failing to reclaim higher resistance levels. The chart shows a clear sequence of lower highs since the October peak near $125,000, confirming that the broader structure has shifted from trend continuation to distribution and consolidation. Each recovery attempt has been capped below descending moving averages, reinforcing the loss of upside momentum.

BTC consolidates around key demand | Source: BTCUSDT chart on TradingView

Price remains below the 50-day and 100-day moving averages, both of which are now sloping downward and acting as dynamic resistance around the $95,000–$98,000 zone. The 200-day moving average sits higher, near the $105,000 area, and continues to define the long-term trend boundary. As long as BTC trades below these levels, rallies are likely to be corrective rather than impulsive.

On the downside, the $85,000–$87,000 region has emerged as an important short-term support, coinciding with recent consolidation lows. The sharp sell-off in November, followed by a high-volume bounce, suggests forced deleveraging rather than organic accumulation. Since then, volume has steadily declined, pointing to reduced participation and a lack of strong directional conviction.

Bitcoin appears locked in a compression phase. Without a decisive reclaim of the mid-range moving averages, the risk remains skewed toward further downside tests. Conversely, sustained acceptance above $95,000 would be required to shift the short-term bias back toward stabilization rather than continuation of the corrective trend.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com 

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

qLabs Fires First Shot in Quantum Crypto Race — Can Coinbase Catch Up?

qLabs Fires First Shot in Quantum Crypto Race — Can Coinbase Catch Up?

The rapid progress of quantum computing is forcing the cryptocurrency industry to confront the problem that has long been treated as theoretical. Blockchains th
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/30 22:53
The Anatomy of a Self-Made Billionaire’s Mindset: How Gurhan Kiziloz Reached a $1.7B Net Worth

The Anatomy of a Self-Made Billionaire’s Mindset: How Gurhan Kiziloz Reached a $1.7B Net Worth

There are many paths to wealth in the modern economy, but the one Gurhan Kiziloz took stands out for a simple reason: he built everything himself. By 2026, the
Share
Coinstats2026/01/30 23:07
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28