Silver moved fast, then pulled back just as quickly. That sudden liquidation caught attention because the price action felt out of sync with what was happening underneath the surface. The move did not last long, yet it opened a window into how silver price discovery works when paper markets and physical demand briefly drift apart.
The liquidation did not appear out of nowhere. Silver had already posted a steep rally before the pullback arrived. That rally pushed price charts into near vertical territory, which often invites aggressive positioning and fast profit-taking. Once selling pressure entered the market, liquidation followed quickly and compressed the move into a short time window.
Bull Theory pointed to a temporary pricing gap that appeared during this period. Silver price on COMEX hovered near $92, while physical silver in Shanghai traded closer to $130. That gap did not persist for long, yet it highlighted how different venues respond to stress. The episode resolved as prices adjusted, which supports the view that this was a brief dislocation rather than a lasting condition.
Bull Theory explained that COMEX silver price action relies heavily on paper contracts. A large share of volume comes from claims rather than physical metal changing hands. Estimates often place the paper-to-physical ratio near 350 to 1. Under those conditions, heavy selling of contracts can pressure silver price even when physical supply remains tight.
This mechanism helps explain how liquidation can occur without visible strain in physical markets. Paper selling accelerates moves during volatile phases. Once that pressure eases, pricing tends to stabilize. The short duration of the silver price gap supports this interpretation.
Bull Theory also highlighted pricing from SMM and Shanghai, which track real transactions tied to physical delivery. Silver holding near $120 in those venues showed demand stayed present during the sell-off. Buyers continued paying premiums when availability mattered more than leverage.
This contrast mattered because it showed the liquidation did not stem from collapsing demand. The move reflected how different market structures react during sharp transitions. Physical pricing stayed resilient even as paper markets adjusted.
CrediBULL Crypto placed the move into a broader context. Silver recently broke out from a 44 year base, which marked a structural change. That breakout did not disappear because of a short liquidation. CrediBULL Crypto also noted that buying near vertical extensions carries risk, especially after a 400% advance over the past year.
Silver cycles move slower than crypto cycles. Corrections can stretch across 12 to 18 months without invalidating the larger pattern. Profit taking often appears once price enters discovery after decades of compression.
Read Also: XRP Short-Term Price Outlook: Reversal Not In Sight Yet
The liquidation raised eyebrows because it looked dramatic on the surface. Underneath, the episode clarified how paper-driven pricing can move faster than physical demand during sharp transitions. Bull Theory and CrediBULL Crypto both framed the move as part of a larger process rather than a breakdown.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel for daily crypto updates, market insights, and expert analysis.
The post Silver Liquidation Raised Eyebrows: Here’s What Actually Happened appeared first on CaptainAltcoin.


