A high-profile debate on January 30, 2026, brought together longtime gold advocate Peter Schiff and prominent Bitcoin proponent Anthony Pompliano on The Pomp Podcast, where the two laid out sharply opposing views on inflation, monetary policy, and which asset is best positioned for the years ahead.
While both agreed that the U.S. dollar is under increasing pressure, their conclusions about what comes next, and what investors should hold, diverged fundamentally.
Schiff argued that the United States is approaching a monetary breaking point, driven by persistent deficit spending and inflationary fiscal policy. In his view, the dollar is on an irreversible path toward collapse, setting the stage for a hard-asset reset.
Pompliano countered that the U.S. economy is entering a high-growth phase, fueled by deregulation, technological efficiency, and capital formation. Rather than stagflation, he sees a system capable of absorbing debt through productivity gains and innovation, reducing long-term inflation pressure.
For Schiff, gold remains the only true hard asset. He emphasized its 3,000-year monetary history, physical utility, and central bank adoption as proof that it will outlast fiat currencies and speculative alternatives. He described Bitcoin as a “faith-based asset backed by nothing”, arguing that its price ultimately depends on sentiment rather than intrinsic value.
Pompliano framed Bitcoin as layer-one monetary technology, positioning it as a modern evolution of gold. He highlighted Bitcoin’s portability, fixed supply, resistance to seizure, and growing institutional adoption, arguing that these characteristics make it superior in a digital global economy.
Schiff described 2026 as the year “when it gets real” for precious metals, following what he views as a decisive breakout in 2025. He expects gold and silver to benefit from accelerating de-dollarization and rising distrust in sovereign debt markets.
Pompliano focused instead on observable demand signals. He argued that Bitcoin’s future no longer hinges on ideology, but on measurable flows through regulated channels such as spot ETFs, custodial platforms, and institutional products. For him, continued inflows, not narratives, will determine Bitcoin’s durability.
Despite their disagreements, both participants acknowledged that the “debasement trade” is real. Where they differ is in the destination:
Schiff dismissed the idea that Bitcoin could replace gold, warning that speculative assets often collapse during true economic stress. Pompliano responded by questioning gold’s relative performance since 2020, calling it a poor hedge compared to technology-driven assets.
The discussion took place amid extreme metals market volatility. On January 29, 2026, silver suffered a historic one-day drop of more than 30%, a move Schiff described as a warning sign for speculative excess. He argued that Bitcoin could soon experience a similar, but more severe, unwind.
Pompliano acknowledged short-term volatility but maintained that structural adoption matters more than price shocks, particularly as institutional access broadens.
The Schiff–Pompliano debate underscored a deeper divide in macro investing: history versus technology, tangible assets versus digital scarcity, and collapse narratives versus adaptive growth models. While both agree the dollar’s dominance is being tested, their disagreement over what replaces it reflects two fundamentally different visions of the future financial system.
As 2026 unfolds, markets, not arguments, will decide which thesis carries more weight.
The post Bitcoin vs Gold: Peter Schiff and Anthony Pompliano Clash Over 2026 Outlook appeared first on ETHNews.


The new Fed chairman and geopolitical risks affect cryptocurrency outlook. Bitcoin fails to maintain key levels, hitting lowest since October 2023. Continue
