The post Fear hits a 2026 high as traders panic at $81,000 level appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin’s slide to $84,200 has triggered a burst of panic The post Fear hits a 2026 high as traders panic at $81,000 level appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin’s slide to $84,200 has triggered a burst of panic

Fear hits a 2026 high as traders panic at $81,000 level

Bitcoin’s slide to $84,200 has triggered a burst of panic on social media, with analytics firm Santiment saying negative commentary has jumped to the highest level of 2026 so far.

The move pushed BTC sentiment to its lowest level since Nov. 21 and flipped the mood from cautious to outright fear, a shift that tends to show up when late sellers finally give up.

Santiment tracks the ratio of positive to negative commentary across social platforms and said the balance has skewed hard toward pessimism.

That matters because crypto often turns on positioning and emotion as much as headlines. When the crowd leans too far one way, markets can run out of marginal sellers, especially after sharp drops that force traders to cut leverage or meet margin calls.

(Santiment)

This does not mean a clean bounce is guaranteed. Fear spikes can stretch for days if macro markets keep wobbling or if bitcoin fails to reclaim key levels that traders watch, like $90,000.

A choppy tape also fits the broader backdrop. Equities, gold and silver have all seen their own pullbacks after big runs, and that cross market de risking can spill into crypto through liquidity and leverage.

Still, Santiment framed the fear jump as closer to capitulation than the start of a fresh euphoria phase, as retail traders tend to sell when pain peaks, while larger players with longer time horizons often buy into that forced selling.

If bitcoin stabilizes and the fear wave cools, the same traders posting doom today can become tomorrow’s chase bid.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/01/31/bitcoin-fear-sentiment-hits-a-2026-high-as-price-lingers-under-usd83-000

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Witness Bitcoin’s Dramatic Plunge in A Volatile Crypto Market

Witness Bitcoin’s Dramatic Plunge in A Volatile Crypto Market

The new Fed chairman and geopolitical risks affect cryptocurrency outlook. Bitcoin fails to maintain key levels, hitting lowest since October 2023. Continue
Share
Coinstats2026/02/01 03:04
Smart Money Accumulates SUI as Weekly Chart Signals Expansion Phase Ahead

Smart Money Accumulates SUI as Weekly Chart Signals Expansion Phase Ahead

TLDR: SUI preserves its long-term ascending channel, signaling macro strength despite deep corrective phases  Sell-side liquidity sweeps near trendline support
Share
Blockonomi2026/02/01 03:25