The post OKX CEO Links October Crypto Crash To High-Risk Yield Practices On Binance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The global crypto market continues to unpackThe post OKX CEO Links October Crypto Crash To High-Risk Yield Practices On Binance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The global crypto market continues to unpack

OKX CEO Links October Crypto Crash To High-Risk Yield Practices On Binance

6 min read

The global crypto market continues to unpack the real cause behind the violent sell-off that rocked digital assets in mid-October, wiping out tens of billions of dollars in liquidations within hours.

Now, OKX CEO Star Xu is openly pointing to what he describes as a dangerous leverage cycle enabled by Binance, one that quietly transformed a yield product into a systemic risk engine.

In a detailed public statement shared on X, Star Xu argued that the October 11 crash was not a random volatility event but the result of structural failures created by how USDe was promoted, treated, and repeatedly leveraged across the market. His comments, which can be found, are quickly reshaping industry conversations around risk management and exchange responsibility.

According to Xu, the fallout has already altered the microstructure of crypto trading itself.

“On October 10, tens of billions of dollars were liquidated. As CEO of OKX, we observed clearly that the crypto market’s microstructure fundamentally changed after that day,” he stated.

Many market participants now believe the damage surpassed even the collapse of FTX, a claim that underscores just how deeply the shockwaves traveled.

Binance’s USDe Yield Campaign Sparked A High-Risk Leverage Loop

At the center of Xu’s criticism is a temporary user-acquisition campaign launched by Binance that offered an eye-catching 12% APY on USDe holdings.

While high yields are nothing new in crypto, the issue, according to Xu, was how Binance allowed USDe to function almost identically to traditional stablecoins like USDT and USDC, including being used as collateral with no meaningful restrictions.

This effectively positioned USDe as a “safe” asset in traders’ eyes, despite carrying a much higher embedded risk profile.

Users were encouraged to convert their USDT and USDC into USDe to chase returns, often without clear communication about the underlying exposure they were taking on.

From the surface, it looked like a simple yield opportunity.

Under the hood, it was something far more dangerous.

USDe Operates Like A Tokenized Hedge Fund, Not A Stablecoin

Star Xu emphasized that USDe is fundamentally different from standard stablecoins or low-risk tokenized funds.

USDe is issued by Ethena, which raises capital through what it markets as a “stablecoin,” then deploys those funds into index arbitrage and algorithmic trading strategies, essentially running hedge-fund-style operations and tokenizing the resulting positions.

The token can then be deposited on exchanges to earn yield.

This structure, Xu explained, embeds hedge-fund-level risk directly into a product many users treated like digital cash.

That’s where the danger emerged.

He contrasted USDe with tokenized money market funds such as BlackRock’s BUIDL and Franklin Templeton’s BENJI, which are designed around conservative, low-risk financial instruments.

USDe, by comparison, carries structural trading exposure.

“The difference is not cosmetic, it is fundamental,” Xu noted.

Yet on major platforms, that distinction was barely visible to everyday traders.

Repeated Collateral Cycling Pushed Leverage To Extreme Levels

What turned risk into systemic instability was the feedback loop Binance’s collateral structure enabled.

According to Xu, users began following a repeating strategy:

  • They converted USDT and USDC into USDe to earn yield.
  • They used USDe as collateral to borrow USDT.
  • They converted the borrowed USDT back into USDe.

They repeated the cycle again and again.

Each loop stacked more leverage onto the system.

On paper, traders saw APYs balloon to 24%, 36%, even above 70%. Because these opportunities existed on one of the world’s largest exchanges, many assumed the risk was minimal.

In reality, leverage was quietly compounding across the entire market.

Systemic exposure wasn’t isolated to one platform, it spread globally.

And once enough pressure built up, all it took was a relatively small shock to bring the structure down.

Depegging Triggered Liquidation Cascades Across The Market

When volatility finally hit, the weakness of the system surfaced instantly.

USDe began to depeg.

That single break triggered massive forced liquidations as leveraged positions unraveled in rapid succession. Collateral values dropped, margin calls accelerated, and automated sell-offs flooded the market.

Xu also pointed to risk management gaps around assets like WETH and BNSOL, which amplified price crashes even further.

Some tokens briefly traded close to zero as liquidity vanished.

The result was one of the most violent liquidation events in crypto history.

“The damage to global users and companies, including OKX customers, was severe, and recovery will take time,” Xu said.

What had started as a yield promotion ended as a systemic breakdown.

Industry Leaders Face Growing Pressure Over Risk Transparency

Despite the sharp critique, Xu stressed that his goal is not to attack Binance personally but to spotlight the deeper structural problems that allowed such risk to accumulate unnoticed.

He warned that open discussion may trigger backlash and misinformation but insisted that transparency is essential if crypto is to mature into a trustworthy financial system.

“As the largest global platform, Binance has outsized influence, and corresponding responsibility, as an industry leader,” he stated.

In Xu’s view, long-term trust cannot be built on aggressive yield incentives, excessive leverage, or marketing that blurs real risk.

Instead, exchanges must prioritize:

• Clear risk disclosure

• Responsible collateral frameworks

• Limits on recursive leverage

• Market stability over short-term user growth

The industry, he added, needs leadership focused on sustainable innovation, not a winner-take-all mindset where criticism is treated as hostility.

A Turning Point For Crypto Market Structure

The October crash is increasingly being seen not as an isolated event, but as a structural wake-up call.

Just as the 2022 collapses reshaped custody and proof-of-reserves practices, this latest meltdown is now forcing hard conversations around leverage design, yield products, and how exchanges present risk to users.

Star Xu’s comments have already fueled broader debate among traders, analysts, and platform operators.

If his assessment holds, the real lesson of October isn’t about one token depegging, it’s about how modern crypto infrastructure can quietly turn complex financial engineering into mass-market risk.

And unless the industry corrects those feedback loops, the next crash may come even faster.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Source: https://nulltx.com/okx-ceo-links-october-crypto-crash-to-high-risk-yield-practices-on-binance/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15