Apple has spent years calling the shots with the factories and firms that build smartphone components. That’s changing fast as companies racing to build artificialApple has spent years calling the shots with the factories and firms that build smartphone components. That’s changing fast as companies racing to build artificial

companies outbid Apple in battle for critical components

2026/02/02 09:28
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
Apple has spent years calling the shots with the factories and firms that build smartphone components. That’s changing fast as companies racing to build artificial intelligence systems write enormous checks and snap up the same materials the iPhone maker relies on.

The result is a reversal of fortune for Apple. Parts manufacturers who previously bent over backward to please the tech giant now have enough business elsewhere to demand better terms. Experts predict Apple’s typically fat profit margins will get thinner this year, with consumers potentially facing the consequences down the road.

During Thursday’s earnings call, Apple’s head Tim Cook acknowledged the challenge. He told investors the company was struggling to secure adequate chip quantities while memory costs were climbing at a steep rate. His comments appeared to dampen investor enthusiasm for Apple stock, which remained unchanged despite exceptional iPhone revenue and the company posting its highest-ever earnings.

Sravan Kundojjala, an industry expert at research firm SemiAnalysis, put it bluntly that “Apple is getting squeezed for sure.”

Nvidia overtakes Apple at TSMC

A significant development came when Nvidia, the dominant player in AI processors, overtook Apple as the number-one client of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, known as TSMC. Nvidia’s leader Jensen Huang revealed this on a podcast. Apple had maintained a commanding lead as TSMC’s primary buyer for many years. TSMC produces the planet’s cutting-edge chips powering AI data centers, mobile phones, and various computing equipment.

Large-scale AI computers bear little resemblance to consumer smartphones, yet numerous manufacturers provide components for both categories. Memory chips have become especially scarce as organizations including OpenAI, Google under Alphabet, Meta, and Microsoft collectively invest hundreds of billions building out AI infrastructure.

Mike Howard from research firm TechInsights described the situation: “The rate of increase in the price of memory is unprecedented.” His analysis covers NAND flash storage chips that save pictures and clips, plus DRAM chips enabling quick application performance. TechInsights projects DRAM costs will reach four times their 2023 levels before year-end, with NAND surpassing triple.

Howard calculates Apple could face $57 in additional expenses for both memory types in the entry-level iPhone 18 launching this autumn versus the baseline iPhone 17 available now. For a handset priced at $799, such an increase would substantially cut into earnings.

Apple’s financial muscle and electronics design capabilities previously established it as an unbeatable heavyweight among Asian manufacturers producing iPhone components and assembling finished units. The company allocates billions annually just for NAND purchases, according to individuals with knowledge of the spending, positioning it as likely the globe’s largest individual purchaser.

Component makers eagerly pursued Apple contracts, aiming to capitalize on its technical expertise and brand recognition to land additional clients.

Times have changed, though. Ming-chi Kuo from TF International Securities observed: “the companies now pushing the boundaries of human-scale engineering are the ones like Nvidia.”

AI hardware demand outpaces Apple’s growth

Apple’s budget growth appears moderate when measured against the massive expenditures filling AI computing facilities, despite achieving record-breaking iPhone 17 sales.

South Korean manufacturers Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix are increasing what they charge Apple for a specific DRAM variant, say individuals connected to Apple’s supplier network. Major AI players offer generous compensation and commit to guaranteed purchases with advance funding, providing these chipmakers negotiating strength versus the iPhone producer.

While Apple establishes lengthy supply agreements for memory, it has exploited its market position to extract concessions from vendors. These contracts allowed Apple to renegotiate pricing as frequently as weekly intervals and even completely stop purchases from any supplier whose rates Apple considered unfavorable, say people aware of its procurement practices. Seeking additional bargaining power, Apple began stockpiling larger memory reserves. This represented a departure for Cook, who typically maintains minimal inventories to optimize the company’s available cash.

Apple’s competition extends beyond immediate component deliveries to securing engineers’ focus at manufacturing partners. Specialists in glass technology previously dedicated to perfecting ultra-smooth, lightweight phone screens now also devote hours to specialized glass materials needed for housing sophisticated AI processing chips, industry leaders indicate.

Producers of sensing devices and various iPhone internals are capturing fresh contracts from AI enterprises like OpenAI developing proprietary hardware.

Nevertheless, suppliers indicated they had no plans to walk away from Apple relationships. Partnering with Apple provides valuable learning experiences, they explained, since it continues ranking among the industry’s most exacting and methodical clients.

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

World Gold Council’s Pivotal Framework Promises Unprecedented Market Trust

World Gold Council’s Pivotal Framework Promises Unprecedented Market Trust

The post World Gold Council’s Pivotal Framework Promises Unprecedented Market Trust appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tokenized Gold Revolution: World Gold Council
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/20 03:58
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Shiba Inu Price Prediction 2026: SHIB Fights to Reclaim Its Glory While Pepeto Offers the 150x Early Window That SHIB Already Closed

Shiba Inu Price Prediction 2026: SHIB Fights to Reclaim Its Glory While Pepeto Offers the 150x Early Window That SHIB Already Closed

A truck driver put $650 into Shiba Inu in 2020 and quit his job after his bag grew to $1.7 million. Two brothers invested $7,900 during the COVID lockdowns and
Share
Blockonomi2026/03/20 04:32