CrossCurve has confirmed that its cross-chain bridge is under active attack after a missing validation check allowed spoofed cross-chain messages to pass throughCrossCurve has confirmed that its cross-chain bridge is under active attack after a missing validation check allowed spoofed cross-chain messages to pass through

CrossCurve Confirms Active Bridge Exploit Across Multiple Networks

2026/02/03 00:04

CrossCurve has confirmed that its cross-chain bridge is under active attack after a missing validation check allowed spoofed cross-chain messages to pass through its system.

The vulnerability enabled attackers to drain funds directly from the protocol’s PortalV2 contract, with onchain data showing losses of roughly $3 million spread across multiple blockchain networks.

The team publicly acknowledged the exploit and urged users to immediately pause all interactions with the platform while emergency investigations continue.

CrossCurve, formerly known as EYWA, is a Curve-backed interoperability project supported by Curve founder Michael Egorov and previously raised approximately $7 million in funding.

The confirmation marks yet another reminder of how cross-chain bridges remain one of the most targeted and vulnerable components of DeFi infrastructure.

Validation Flaw Lets Spoofed Messages Drain PortalV2 Funds

According to CrossCurve’s initial technical findings, the exploit originated from a missing validation check in the bridge’s message verification process.

This flaw allowed attackers to craft fraudulent cross-chain instructions that appeared legitimate to the protocol, enabling unauthorized withdrawals without triggering internal safeguards.

Once the spoofed messages passed through the system, the attacker systematically drained assets held within the PortalV2 contract across several connected networks.

Bridge exploits have become a dominant attack vector in crypto over the past two years, largely because they hold pooled liquidity designed to move assets between chains quickly, creating massive single points of failure.

In CrossCurve’s case, the exploit did not require breaching smart contract logic directly. Instead, it abused the messaging layer that coordinates asset movement across ecosystems.

The team has since frozen the exploited bridge and launched a full forensic review to understand exactly how the validation mechanism was bypassed.

Hacker Drains EYWA Tokens But Cannot Liquidate Them

One of the largest assets affected by the breach was EYWA, CrossCurve’s native token.

The attacker extracted 999,787,453.03 EYWA tokens onto the Ethereum network, but the team quickly clarified that these tokens are effectively trapped and cannot be sold or circulated.

Despite EYWA launching originally on Ethereum, its entire circulating supply was migrated to Arbitrum during the token generation event.

As a result:

• There are no DEX liquidity pools for EYWA on Ethereum

• The only centralized exchange that supported Ethereum-network EYWA froze deposits

• The exploited bridge has been frozen to block further movement

In practical terms, the stolen EYWA tokens now sit isolated on Ethereum with no route to exit, trade, or impact circulating supply.

CrossCurve emphasized that all EYWA held on Arbitrum remains fully safe, and users can continue swapping and trading normally on both decentralized and centralized exchanges.

To reinforce containment, the team also contacted major trading platforms, including KuCoin, Gate, MEXC, BingX, and BitMart, to ensure the attacker has zero opportunity to liquidate any stolen tokens.

Other Tokens Successfully Drained From The Bridge

While the EYWA portion of the exploit remains neutralized, the hacker did manage to successfully extract a range of other assets from the bridge infrastructure.

The stolen token volumes include:

3CRV, 2,578.22

USDT, 815,361

WETH, 123.59

CRV, 239,889.64

2CRV, 2,421.92

USDC, 34,820.73

WBTC, 2.64

USDB, 10,288.43

c(USD)CT, 4,199.24

frxUSD, 1,064.99

In market value terms, losses were split between:

• $110,194.49 from CrossCurve liquidity pools

• $1,331,697.82 from the Units blockchain

This brings the confirmed total to $1,441,892.31 in assets that were successfully removed and remain under attacker control.

While smaller than some recent bridge exploits, the breach still represents a major security incident for a growing interoperability protocol.

Exchanges Freeze Deposits As Investigation Intensifies

CrossCurve has moved aggressively to limit any potential downstream damage from the exploit.

Beyond freezing the compromised bridge, the team coordinated directly with centralized exchanges to ensure stolen assets cannot be deposited, swapped, or laundered through trading platforms.

This rapid response significantly reduces the attacker’s ability to realize profits, a tactic that has increasingly become standard practice in modern DeFi incident containment.

At the same time, CrossCurve has launched a full investigation to determine:

• The exact exploit pathway

• Whether additional vulnerabilities exist

• How to permanently harden validation mechanisms

• What long-term protocol upgrades are required

The team has also issued a 72-hour window for the attacker to initiate contact regarding a potential return of stolen funds, a common approach in DeFi incidents that sometimes results in partial or full recovery.

Meanwhile, blockchain forensic tracking is actively mapping associated wallets and transaction flows to identify the attacker’s broader network.

Another Warning Sign For Cross-Chain Bridge Security

The CrossCurve exploit adds to a growing list of bridge-focused attacks that continue to drain hundreds of millions from the crypto ecosystem each year.

While smart contract auditing has improved across DeFi, cross-chain messaging systems remain complex, fragmented, and difficult to fully secure, often involving offchain relayers, verification layers, and custom validation logic.

A single missing check, as seen in this incident, can expose massive pooled liquidity in seconds.

For protocols, this highlights the urgent need for:

• Formal verification of bridge logic

• Redundant validation systems

• Time delays on large cross-chain transfers

• Continuous real-time monitoring

• Segmented liquidity instead of single pools

For users, it reinforces that bridges remain among the highest-risk components of decentralized infrastructure, even when backed by experienced teams and major industry figures.

Although CrossCurve acted quickly to contain damage and protect user funds, the exploit underscores how fragile interoperability layers can be when even small implementation flaws exist.

As cross-chain activity continues to grow, security around validation mechanisms will likely become one of the most critical battlegrounds in DeFi’s next evolution.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

The post UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The UK and US are reportedly preparing to deepen cooperation on digital assets, with Britain looking to copy the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly stance in a bid to boost innovation.  UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed on Tuesday how the two nations could strengthen their coordination on crypto, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter.  The discussions also involved representatives from crypto companies, including Coinbase, Circle Internet Group and Ripple, with executives from the Bank of America, Barclays and Citi also attending, according to the report. The agreement was made “last-minute” after crypto advocacy groups urged the UK government on Thursday to adopt a more open stance toward the industry, claiming its cautious approach to the sector has left the country lagging in innovation and policy.  Source: Rachel Reeves Deal to include stablecoins, look to unlock adoption Any deal between the countries is likely to include stablecoins, the Financial Times reported, an area of crypto that US President Donald Trump made a policy priority and in which his family has significant business interests. The Financial Times reported on Monday that UK crypto advocacy groups also slammed the Bank of England’s proposal to limit individual stablecoin holdings to between 10,000 British pounds ($13,650) and 20,000 pounds ($27,300), claiming it would be difficult and expensive to implement. UK banks appear to have slowed adoption too, with around 40% of 2,000 recently surveyed crypto investors saying that their banks had either blocked or delayed a payment to a crypto provider.  Many of these actions have been linked to concerns over volatility, fraud and scams. The UK has made some progress on crypto regulation recently, proposing a framework in May that would see crypto exchanges, dealers, and agents treated similarly to traditional finance firms, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:21
Ethereum (ETH) Price Aims for $10,000 as One ETH Token Gain Attention

Ethereum (ETH) Price Aims for $10,000 as One ETH Token Gain Attention

Ethereum’s (ETH) rally has no signs of letting up as analysts eye a climb to $10,000. However, attention is not only drawn to ETH. Mutuum Finance (MUTM), a recent entrant into decentralized finance (DeFi), is drawing attention for its lending and borrowing protocol that offers real-world utility within an increasingly crowded market.  Mutuum Finance is […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 09:00
A 3821% surge in 20 years: Why are Pokémon cards valuable investments?

A 3821% surge in 20 years: Why are Pokémon cards valuable investments?

By David Unyime Nkanta Compiled by: TechFlow The Pokémon trading card game is extremely popular around the world, especially in Japan. These cards are very valuable, especially the rare ones. (Image source: Twitter / FADA Pack Magic @FadaPackMagic) Pokémon trading cards have gone from amusement park items to one of the world's hottest alternative investments. According to data from analytics firm Card Ladder, the Pokémon card market has grown 3,821% in value since 2004, far outpacing the S&P 500's 483% increase and Meta Platforms' 1,844% growth. From hobby to high-yield asset Pokémon trading cards, launched by Nintendo in 1996, have become a popular investment, traded across platforms including eBay, TCGplayer, and international expos. The market has seen explosive growth during the pandemic, as stimulus policies and lockdowns have driven collectors toward alternative assets. For some, the investment has yielded life-changing returns. Lucas Shaw, a 27-year-old account manager in Ohio, said the profits from selling the cards helped him pay for his wedding rings and celebrations. Similarly, Justin Wilson, a 32-year-old advertising manager in Oklahoma City, estimates the total value of his collection of 500 cards and 100 sealed items at about $100,000. He considers Pokémon cards part of his investment portfolio, alongside his Roth IRA and securities accounts. The appeal of Pokémon cards lies not only in financial gain but also in their emotional resonance. "You have to collect them all," Wilson said, referencing the series's classic slogan. For many, the cards represent both childhood nostalgia and speculative opportunity. Where does the value of rare Pokémon cards come from? A classic Poké Ball toy with matching Pokémon trading cards. Zapdos, Ninetales, and a trainer card are clearly visible. Image credit: Thimo Pedersen/Unsplash Unlike stocks, Pokémon cards don't generate dividends; their value depends on their rarity, condition, and cultural significance. Cards graded as perfect PSA 10 by the Professional Sports Authenticator (PSA) often fetch exorbitant prices. The most dramatic example occurred in 2022, when influencer Logan Paul purchased a near-perfect "Pikachu Illustrator" card for $5.3 million, setting a Guinness World Record for the most expensive Pokémon card ever sold privately. This event further ignited market interest and highlighted the speculative potential of high-level cards. Risks of the Pokémon Card Market Financial advisors warn against considering collectibles as the core of a portfolio. Card prices are extremely volatile, influenced by hype, media coverage, and collector sentiment. Counterfeit cards also remain a potential threat, with scams frequently occurring. Image source: Flickr/c0rnnibblets Still, the resilience of the Pokémon brand provides some stability to the market. Pokémon spans video games, movies, and merchandise, and unlike sports trading cards, the characters are immune to scandals, making them a safer investment for some collectors. The Future of Collectibles Investing The rapid rise of Pokémon cards reflects a broader shift in people's perception of value. As digital assets like Bitcoin face regulatory scrutiny and tech stocks undergo a market correction, tangible collectibles offer a nostalgic and potentially profitable haven. While the sustainability of its value remains uncertain, the 3,821% growth over the past 20 years has established Pokémon trading cards as the most vivid example of how a childhood hobby can transform into a multi-million dollar investment.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 18:00