Orca DAO has introduced a new treasury proposal designed to strengthen the Orca protocol through Solana staking and long-term token buybacks.  The proposal was posted to the Orca (ORCA) governance forum on Aug 6. The DAO’s Governance Council would have…Orca DAO has introduced a new treasury proposal designed to strengthen the Orca protocol through Solana staking and long-term token buybacks.  The proposal was posted to the Orca (ORCA) governance forum on Aug 6. The DAO’s Governance Council would have…

Orca DAO proposes Solana staking and ORCA buybacks

2025/08/07 12:30

Orca DAO has introduced a new treasury proposal designed to strengthen the Orca protocol through Solana staking and long-term token buybacks. 

Summary
  • Orca DAO plans to stake 55K SOL and repurchase ORCA over a 24-month period.
  • Repurchased tokens may be burned, used for staking rewards, or granted to ecosystem projects.
  • The initiative seeks to reduce supply, strengthen Solana alignment, and boost long-term protocol value.

The proposal was posted to the Orca (ORCA) governance forum on Aug 6. The DAO’s Governance Council would have the power to stake up to 55,000 SOL from the Treasury wallet into a specific Orca validator node if it were approved.

The change is expected to enhance Orca protocol’s transaction propagation while earning staking rewards that can be used for grants, token incentives, or additional development.

https://twitter.com/orca_so/status/1953190240568655930?s=46&t=nznXkss3debX8JIhNzHmzw

This validator would give Orca a means to make good use of unused treasury assets in addition to promoting the stability and decentralization of the Solana (SOL) network.

Buyback program to reduce supply and reward holders

The proposal adds a 24-month buyback program for the ORCA token in addition to staking. The Council would be allowed to repurchase ORCA from the open market using the Treasury’s SOL and USD Coin (USDC) holdings, which currently total about 55,000 SOL and $400,000, respectively. 

To minimize the impact on the market, these purchases would be timed carefully. Buybacks would be restricted according to trading volume and halted during times of high price volatility.

Purchased tokens would be kept in a multi-signature wallet under DAO control. Depending on the requirements of the protocol, they could be distributed as grants to support ecosystem expansion, permanently burned to lower the amount in circulation, or given to xORCA staking participants as extra rewards.

To ensure transparency, the Council has committed to publishing detailed quarterly reports that include information on token purchases, average prices, and treasury balances. Additionally, all relevant wallets will be made publicly available on-chain.

Deflation, staking incentives, and ecosystem growth

This proposal comes after an earlier proposal from April 2025 that included a 25% supply burn and $10 million in buybacks, which caused ORCA’s price to rise by 76.8%. The latest proposal continues that deflationary trend by introducing staking-based revenue and a longer buyback window. 

Following a four-day discussion period, the proposal will be subject to a five-day on-chain vote, followed by a two-day cooldown phase during which tokenholders may submit a veto. If no veto is submitted, the Council will move forward with execution.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Vitalik Buterin Suggests Ethereum Security Intact Amid Recent Glitch

Vitalik Buterin Suggests Ethereum Security Intact Amid Recent Glitch

The post Vitalik Buterin Suggests Ethereum Security Intact Amid Recent Glitch appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum remains secure despite a recent network glitch caused by a Prysm client bug that temporarily halted block finalization. Vitalik Buterin emphasized that this does not undermine the network’s core security, as blocks continue to be produced and executed, behaving like Bitcoin’s probabilistic model during such pauses. Vitalik Buterin assures that temporary loss of finality does not compromise Ethereum’s overall security model. The glitch primarily impacted secondary systems like bridges and Layer 2 solutions, not the base chain. Experts compare Ethereum’s response to Bitcoin’s, where probabilistic finality prevents chain rewrites while allowing continued operations. Ethereum secure despite recent glitch: Vitalik Buterin explains why the network’s resilience shines through temporary finality pauses. Discover key insights on blockchain reliability. Stay informed on crypto updates—read more now. What Did Vitalik Buterin Say About Ethereum’s Security After the Recent Glitch? Ethereum remains secure even amid the recent network disruption, according to Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum’s co-founder. He clarified that the Prysm client bug, which briefly interrupted block finalization, does not pose a threat to the protocol’s integrity. Instead, it highlights the network’s design for graceful degradation, where core functions persist without deterministic certainty. How Does Ethereum Behave During Finality Pauses? During the incident, Ethereum temporarily shifted to a probabilistic security model similar to Bitcoin’s, as noted by blockchain researchers. Fabrizio Romano Genovese, an Oxford PhD and Ethereum protocol specialist, explained that many blockchains, including Bitcoin, rely on growing difficulty in rewriting history rather than instant finality. In Ethereum’s case, blocks kept being created and executed, preventing any chain halt, though secondary services like cross-chain bridges experienced delays. This behavior underscores the network’s robustness, with no risk of approving incorrect transaction histories. Genovese added that such events reveal the need for better fallback mechanisms in dependent infrastructure, ensuring smoother operations in future occurrences. Statistics from the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 16:40