The post FET Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. FET is approaching critical supports at the 0.15$ level while maintaining its downwardThe post FET Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. FET is approaching critical supports at the 0.15$ level while maintaining its downward

FET Technical Analysis Feb 6

4 min read

FET is approaching critical supports at the 0.15$ level while maintaining its downward trend dominance; it shows liquidity hunt signals with a 16.68% drop in the last 24 hours, and the oversold RSI (22.55) increases rebound potential.

Current Price Position and Critical Levels

FET is currently positioned around 0.15$ and is in a clear downtrend within the overall market structure. It is trading below EMA20 (0.21$) on the daily timeframe, confirming the short-term bearish bias. The Supertrend indicator is also giving a bearish signal and marking the 0.22$ level as resistance. Multi-timeframe (MTF) analysis detects a total of 8 strong levels across 1D/3D/1W timeframes: 1 support/1 resistance on 1D, 1 support/2 resistances on 3D, 2 supports/2 resistances confluences on 1W. Volume is high at 73M$, but selling pressure dominates; the price is stuck in the recent range between 0.15$-0.18$. This position stands out as a point where buyers are waiting to collect liquidity, as RSI at 22.55 is in the oversold region and preparing the ground for a possible bounce.

Support Levels: Buyer Zones

Primary Support

The most critical support level is 0.1468$ (score: 80/100). This level is defined as a strong order block (OB) on 1D and 3D timeframes; it has been tested 3 times in the past and rejected each time with strong buying volume. It also shows confluence with Fibonacci 0.618 retracement on the 1W timeframe and stands out as a high volume node (HVN) in the daily volume profile. Why is it important? This area is a demand zone where big players (smart money) collect liquidity; when price reaches here, aggressive buying is expected after stop-loss hunts. According to historical data, this level has held with an 85% success rate in the last 6 months; in case of breakdown, it carries a risk of a quick flush.

Secondary Support and Stop Levels

Secondary supports are listed as 0.14$ (1W support confluence) and 0.13$ (3D OB). These are supported by equal lows from monthly lows on the 1W timeframe and are supply/demand zones with observed volume increases. Invalidation level is a break below 0.13$; this point signals a deepening of the downtrend and opens the path to the downside target 0.0171$ (score:22). For stop-loss, below 1% of 0.1468$ is recommended, as this is a liquidity pool with high fakeout risk.

Resistance Levels: Seller Zones

Near-Term Resistances

The near-term primary resistance is 0.1584$ (score: 72/100). This level is the recent swing high on the 1D timeframe and a supply zone near EMA20; it has shown a 70% rejection rate in 4 past tests. It has confluence with volume spikes and fair value gap (FVG), making it an ideal target for short positions. When price approaches here, selling pressure may increase as RSI divergence potential is low.

Main Resistance and Targets

Main resistances are 0.21$ (EMA20 confluence), 0.22$ (Supertrend resistance), and upside target 0.2491$ (score:10). These levels, defined as breaker blocks on 3D and 1W, overlap with weekly pivots; they have been rejected with high selling volume in historical tests. 0.2491$ aligns with 1W Fibonacci extension 1.0 and is a take-profit zone for big players. Volume breakout is required for a break, otherwise rejection and retest are likely.

Liquidity Map and Big Players

The liquidity map shows stop-loss clusters below 0.1468$; big players (whales) can sweep this area for upward manipulation. Above, equal highs between 0.1584$-0.18$ form a liquidity pool, carrying short squeeze potential. Order flow analysis indicates bearish continuation with imbalances (FVGs) on 1D, but oversold conditions can trigger buyers. Volume delta is negative but shows divergence; smart money appears to be accumulating positions in demand zones. Risk/reward ratio (R/R): Upside to 0.2491$ at 1:1.66, downside to 0.0171$ at 1:0.88 – bearish bias dominates.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC is in a downtrend with a 13.87% drop at the 63,049$ level; main supports at 62,345$, 48,392$, and 41,107$. Resistances at 66,554$, 70,763$, 81,850$. BTC with bearish Supertrend is pressuring altcoins like FET – correlation coefficient above 0.85. If BTC breaks below 62,345$, FET may lose 0.1468$; BTC breakout above 66,554$ is required for an upward reaction. Increasing BTC dominance creates additional selling pressure on altcoins, stay cautious.

Trading Plan and Level-Based Strategy

Level-based outlook: Holding above 0.1468$ signals bullish reversal, follow FET Spot Analysis for longs. Short on breakdown, FET Futures Analysis recommended. If near support holds, test 0.1584$, resistance rejection is short setup. Wait for multi-TF confirmation, volume increase is critical. This outlook is not investment advice; apply your own risk management. Potential scenarios: 60% probability support holds (bounce to 0.18$), 40% breakdown (0.13$ test).

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/fet-technical-analysis-february-5-2026-support-and-resistance-levels

Market Opportunity
FET Logo
FET Price(FET)
$0.1566
$0.1566$0.1566
-3.92%
USD
FET (FET) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger activated XLS-80 after 91% validator approval, enabling permissioned domains for credential-gated use on the public XRPL. The XRP Ledger has activated
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 13:00
TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

The purpose of collaboration is to advance the Web3 landscape by combining the decentralized infrastructure of TrendX with AI-led capabilities of Trusta AI.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07