Crypto markets experienced a sharp leverage reset after liquidations surged to $2.6 billion within a 24-hour period, according to CoinGlass data. This marked oneCrypto markets experienced a sharp leverage reset after liquidations surged to $2.6 billion within a 24-hour period, according to CoinGlass data. This marked one

Longs Annihilated: $2.6B Liquidated as Bitcoin Dives Below $60K

2026/02/06 21:18
3 min read

Crypto markets experienced a sharp leverage reset after liquidations surged to $2.6 billion within a 24-hour period, according to CoinGlass data. This marked one of the most aggressive forced sell-offs in recent months and highlighted the fragility of heavily leveraged positioning. Long traders bore the brunt of the damage, with approximately $2.14 billion in long liquidations, while short liquidations remained comparatively muted near $466 million, confirming a strongly one-sided market bias.

As prices declined rapidly, centralized exchanges automatically liquidated overleveraged positions, creating a self-reinforcing sell cascade across Bitcoin, Ethereum, and major altcoins. The speed of the unwind pushed Bitcoin briefly below key psychological and technical levels, dramatically increasing intraday volatility and wiping out weeks of speculative positioning within hours.

One-Sided Long Positioning Amplified the Downside Move

The liquidation wave exposed excessive risk-taking as traders crowded into leveraged long positions during a fragile macro and liquidity environment. With upside conviction high and downside hedging limited, even modest price breaks triggered outsized losses. Once key support zones failed, leverage magnified the move, turning routine pullbacks into forced exits.

CoinGlass liquidation heatmaps showed dense liquidation clusters stacked just above recent trading ranges, signaling that market participants largely ignored warning signs of overextension. Thin order books during the sell-off further worsened execution quality, causing slippage and accelerating forced selling. Rather than reflecting broad spot-market capitulation, the move was driven primarily by derivatives positioning collapsing under its own weight.

Sequential Liquidations Created a Cascade Effect Across Exchanges

As liquidation engines triggered sequentially across platforms, sell pressure compounded rather than stabilized. Each wave of forced selling pushed prices lower, activating the next cluster of liquidations in a chain reaction. This mechanical unwind reinforced panic-driven exits among leveraged traders, even as spot market flows remained relatively orderly.

Importantly, this dynamic underscores how derivatives markets can dominate short-term price action. In high-leverage environments, price discovery becomes less about fundamentals and more about margin thresholds, funding imbalances, and liquidation mechanics.

Historical Context: Large, But Not Unprecedented

While severe, the event remains smaller than the October 2025 liquidation spike exceeding $19 billion, which followed an ETF-driven reversal and remains the largest leverage flush in crypto history. That said, the current event still ranks among the largest single-day liquidation events on record, placing it firmly within the top tier of market-wide leverage resets.

Historically, such flushes tend to remove speculative excess, force weak hands out of positions, and reset market structure. Funding rates typically compress toward neutral or negative territory after events of this scale, reducing incentives for overcrowded trades and improving overall market stability.

Post-Liquidation Signals Point to Leverage Exhaustion, Not Demand Collapse

Following the sell-off, market focus has shifted from fear toward positioning metrics. Funding rates normalized quickly, open interest declined sharply, and derivatives dominance cooled, all signs of leverage exhaustion rather than structural demand destruction. Meanwhile, spot volumes remained comparatively steady, suggesting that long-term holders and organic buyers were not the primary sellers.

While short-term volatility may persist as the market rebalances, the removal of excessive leverage reduces systemic fragility. In previous cycles, liquidation-driven drawdowns of this magnitude often marked transition phases, where price action stabilized under healthier conditions and risk was recalibrated across participants rather than continuously amplified.

The post Longs Annihilated: $2.6B Liquidated as Bitcoin Dives Below $60K appeared first on Coinfomania.

Market Opportunity
Belong Logo
Belong Price(LONG)
$0.002479
$0.002479$0.002479
-2.51%
USD
Belong (LONG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15
White House meeting could unfreeze the crypto CLARITY Act this week, but crypto rewards likely to be the price

White House meeting could unfreeze the crypto CLARITY Act this week, but crypto rewards likely to be the price

White House stablecoin meeting could unfreeze the CLARITY Act, but your USDC rewards may be the price The newly confirmed Feb. 10 White House meeting on stablecoin
Share
CryptoSlate2026/02/09 18:48
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28