Crypto’s 2026 crash is likely to exacerbate woes at so-called digital asset treasuries such as Strategy. Illustration: Gwen P; Source: ShutterstockCrypto’s 2026 crash is likely to exacerbate woes at so-called digital asset treasuries such as Strategy. Illustration: Gwen P; Source: Shutterstock

Crypto treasury execs grit their teeth amid Bitcoin price bloodbath

2026/02/06 22:42
3 min read

Executives at digital asset treasury companies put on a brave face on Thursday as cryptocurrencies continued their monthslong slide.

That slide has completely erased the industry’s once-remarkable gains in the wake of Donald Trump’s reelection in November 2024.

Bitcoin on Thursday fell below $64,000, and Ether fell below $1,900 — month-over-month declines of 31% and 42%, respectively.

The crash is likely to exacerbate woes at so-called digital asset treasuries such as Strategy.

About a year ago, many companies with preexisting business models — and many without — rode the post-election rally by taking on debt to purchase vast amounts of Bitcoin and other leading cryptocurrencies.

Investors saw it as a way to gain indirect exposure to a rising asset class, and many of the companies saw their stock price soar.

But the trade went sideways as crypto prices began to slide toward the end of 2025. Now, many digital asset treasuries have seen their stock price fall below the value of their crypto holdings.

Still, executives at three leading DATs said they would weather the storm.

What‘s the difference?

“When Evernorth goes public, it will do so with revenue of over a billion dollars,” Jessica Jonas, the XRP treasury firm’s chief legal officer, said at the Digital Assets at Duke conference in Durham, North Carolina, on Thursday.

“What we look at, how we measure is year-over-year, not day-over-day. You don’t sell your Apple stock because tech stocks are in a dip.”

Ben Werkman, chief investment officer at Bitcoin treasury firm Strive, said not all DATs were created equal.

And the fact that they accumulated crypto will matter less than how they use that crypto.

“There’s no such thing as a pure play treasury,” he said.

“These are operating companies that have decided to structure their balance sheets around a digital asset. ... But the way [they] are going to use that balance sheet is entirely different.”

Katherine Dowling, the President at Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company, said the firm has yield and “alpha” strategies.

“Those income producing sides of our operating business will pay down the debt,” she said.

But she acknowledged there was “absolutely nothing” to stop an activist investor from forcing a firm whose stock price had fallen below that of its crypto holdings to sell its crypto.

And treasury companies received a wake up call in November when index provider MSCI said it might exclude them from its indexes, according to Jonas.

“The fact that it had to get to that point meant that they weren’t doing a very good job — and none of us were doing a very good job — of communicating, ‘What exactly are these Treasury companies? What are they doing, and why should they be included in indexes?’” she said.

Strive’s Werkman said his business model was based, in part, on two highly optimistic assumptions.

First, every company would eventually hold Bitcoin on its balance sheet; second, Bitcoin would grow at a 30-35% compound annual growth rate over the next decade.

“We’re terrified everyone else is going to figure out what we figured out,” he said, “and by the time everyone else figures it out, it’s going to be very difficult to acquire that capital base.”

Aleks Gilbert is DL News’ New York-based DeFi correspondent. You can reach him at aleks@dlnews.com.

Market Opportunity
PoP Planet Logo
PoP Planet Price(P)
$0.01058
$0.01058$0.01058
-0.09%
USD
PoP Planet (P) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16