THE SECURITIES and Exchange Commission (SEC) has released a draft memorandum circular for public comment on corporate governance training for listed firms, publicTHE SECURITIES and Exchange Commission (SEC) has released a draft memorandum circular for public comment on corporate governance training for listed firms, public

SEC proposes annual governance training for directors, officers

2026/02/09 00:02
3 min read

THE SECURITIES and Exchange Commission (SEC) has released a draft memorandum circular for public comment on corporate governance training for listed firms, public companies, registered issuers, and accredited training providers.

Issued on Feb. 5, the draft circular is open for comments until the end of the month and requires all directors and key officers of covered entities to attend at least one corporate governance training per year.

First-time directors and key officers must undergo initial training covering topics such as OECD governance principles, ASEAN Scorecard, SEC code, ESG (environmental, social, and governance) reporting, board duties, minority protection, financial oversight, compliance, ethics, illegal practices (e.g., insider trading, conflicts), liabilities, confidentiality, and competition law.

Subsequent sessions may delve deeper into these areas and be tailored to each company’s strategy, regulatory environment, and training needs.

Training may be conducted onsite, online, or in hybrid format either by SEC-accredited corporate governance institutional training providers (CG‑ITPs) or through in‑house programs, provided all programs are accredited by the SEC.

Institutions seeking CG‑ITP accreditation must be SEC-registered, demonstrate a track record in training, show sound financials and governance practices, and pay a P50,000 processing fee. Accreditation would be valid for five years, with a lower renewal fee for those in good standing.

Resource speakers must also be accredited, paying a P2,000 fee and meeting minimum qualifications, including relevant expertise, no pending fraud or governance violations, and attendance at least once per year at an SEC governance forum or roundtable.

Companies conducting in-house training must apply for accreditation for each program, show that content covers mandatory topics, maintain systems to document and store training records, pay P10,000 per program and P5,000 per speaker needing accreditation.

Both providers and companies must submit pre-training notices (program details, speakers, materials) and post-training reports (attendance, evaluations, certificates, documentation or recordings) and retain records for five years in an SEC-accessible online repository. Companies must also disclose directors’ and officers’ training in their Annual Corporate Governance Report or Integrated ACGR.

Limited exemptions are allowed, including for SEC-accredited speakers who maintain accreditation and conduct at least one accredited training annually, or for directors and officers attending qualifying foreign governance programs disclosed in governance reports and on company websites. Certain speakers, such as incumbent directors or officers speaking at their own company’s in-house training, incumbent and recently retired senior government officials, and foreign experts, are exempt from SEC accreditation.

Non-compliance may incur escalating fines for late filings, use of non-accredited speakers, failure to attend required training, misrepresentation, or refusal to allow SEC observers during training, with repeated violations potentially resulting in suspension or revocation of accreditation.

The circular would repeal earlier SEC memoranda on corporate governance training, the commission said. — Alexandria Grace C. Magno

Market Opportunity
PUBLIC Logo
PUBLIC Price(PUBLIC)
$0.01488
$0.01488$0.01488
-0.20%
USD
PUBLIC (PUBLIC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption

Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption

The post Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Coinbase has filed a letter with the DOJ urging federal preemption of state crypto laws, citing Oregon’s securities suit, New York’s ETH stance, and staking bans. Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal called state actions “government run amok,” warning that patchwork enforcement “slows innovation and harms consumers.” A legal expert told Decrypt that states risk violating interstate commerce rules and due process, and DOJ support for preemption may mark a potential turning point. Coinbase has gone on the offensive against state regulators, petitioning the Department of Justice that a patchwork of lawsuits and licensing schemes is tearing America’s crypto market apart. “When Oregon can sue us for services that are legal under federal law, something’s broken,” Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal tweeted on Tuesday. “This isn’t federalism—this is government run amok.” When Oregon can sue us for services that are legal under federal law, something’s broken. This isn’t federalism–this is government run amok. We just sent a letter to @TheJusticeDept urging federal action on crypto market structure to remedy this. 1/3 — paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) September 16, 2025 Coinbase’s filing says that states are “expansively interpreting their securities laws in ways that undermine federal law” and violate the dormant Commerce Clause by projecting regulatory preferences beyond state borders. “The current patchwork of state laws isn’t just inefficient – it slows innovation and harms consumers” and demands “federal action on crypto market structure,” Grewal said.  States vs. Coinbase It pointed to Oregon’s securities lawsuit against the exchange, New York’s bid to classify Ethereum as a security, and cease-and-desist orders on staking as proof that rogue states are trying to resurrect the SEC’s discredited “regulation by enforcement” playbook. Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield sued Coinbase in April for promoting unregistered securities, and in July asked a federal judge to return the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:52
Quantum Computing Crypto Threat Is Exaggerated: CoinShares Reveals Sobering Reality

Quantum Computing Crypto Threat Is Exaggerated: CoinShares Reveals Sobering Reality

The post Quantum Computing Crypto Threat Is Exaggerated: CoinShares Reveals Sobering Reality appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Quantum Computing Crypto Threat
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/09 06:25
Top Crypto Presales for February Include Pepepawn and OPZ, but the Upcoming Crypto That Looks Like a True 100x Thunder Is DeepSnitch AI

Top Crypto Presales for February Include Pepepawn and OPZ, but the Upcoming Crypto That Looks Like a True 100x Thunder Is DeepSnitch AI

Bitcoin had another sharp drop on Feb. 6, falling to $60,000. This caused fear in some investors and panic in others. But seasoned investors know that these falls
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/09 06:00