The February 13 flow breakdown shows capital moving selectively rather than broadly across all XRP spot ETFs. Total daily net inflow reached 3.19 million XRP, withThe February 13 flow breakdown shows capital moving selectively rather than broadly across all XRP spot ETFs. Total daily net inflow reached 3.19 million XRP, with

XRP Spot ETFs Add 3.19M XRP in February 13 Inflows

2026/02/15 16:10
3 min read

The February 13 flow breakdown shows capital moving selectively rather than broadly across all XRP spot ETFs.

Total daily net inflow reached 3.19 million XRP, with activity concentrated in three issuers while two funds recorded no new positioning.

The distribution of flows, both in XRP terms and dollar value, provides a clearer picture of where institutional allocation is currently focused.

Daily Inflow Breakdown by Issuer

As of February 13, the data reflects the following:

  • Bitwise (2XRP, NYSE): 1.79M XRP inflow
    – $2.52M daily net inflow
    – Cumulative net inflow: $361.81M
    – Premium/Discount: +0.49%
  • Franklin (3XRPZ, NYSE): 1.09M XRP inflow
    – $1.53M daily net inflow
    – Cumulative net inflow: $328.33M
    – Premium/Discount: +0.19%
  • Canary (1XRPC, NASDAQ): 319.19K XRP inflow
    – $449.65K daily net inflow
    – Cumulative net inflow: $413.05M
    – Premium/Discount: +0.28%
  • 21Shares (4TOXR, CBOE): 0 XRP
    – $0 daily net inflow
    – Cumulative net inflow: $70.22K
  • Grayscale (5GXRP, NYSE): 0 XRP
    – $0 daily net inflow
    – Cumulative net inflow: $131.46M
    – Premium/Discount: -0.14%

The combined XRP inflow across active issuers totals approximately 3.19 million XRP, slightly below the earlier rounded 3.3 million figure, reflecting the precise exchange-reported data.

Structural Interpretation of the Flows

Bitwise led the session in both XRP and dollar terms, accounting for more than half of the daily allocation. Franklin followed with just over one million XRP, while Canary added a smaller but positive contribution. The absence of flows from 21Shares and Grayscale suggests uneven participation rather than uniform institutional demand.

Premium readings across Bitwise, Franklin, and Canary remained positive, indicating trading above net asset value on the day. Grayscale, by contrast, traded at a slight discount while recording no net inflow, signaling relative positioning neutrality rather than expansion.

The cumulative net inflow figures, all exceeding $328 million for the three largest funds, confirm that XRP ETF exposure remains materially established rather than newly emerging.

Trump-Linked Truth Social Files for Two Crypto ETFs

Why the Distribution Matters

ETF flow data reflects structured allocation decisions rather than short-term speculative activity. Concentrated inflows into specific vehicles often point to investor preference tied to liquidity, fee structure, exchange access, or mandate constraints.

The 3.19 million XRP addition demonstrates incremental institutional absorption, but the uneven distribution underscores that demand remains selective. Sustained follow-through across multiple sessions would be required to signal a broader structural shift in allocation behavior.

For now, the February 13 session reflects controlled inflow concentration rather than broad-based expansion across the entire XRP ETF landscape.

The post XRP Spot ETFs Add 3.19M XRP in February 13 Inflows appeared first on ETHNews.

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$1.5338
$1.5338$1.5338
+4.41%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.