The Nigerian Startup Ecosystem Deep Dive: $4.17B | 293 Companies | 528 Deals

I spent one month tracking every Nigerian startup funding round from 2018 to 2025.

$4.17 billion. 293 companies. 528 deals.

The pattern that emerged shocked me

While founders chase Fintech (capturing 64% of all capital), the data reveals a hidden graveyard. Fintech has the WORST follow-on funding rate (40%) among all major sectors. Meanwhile, CleanTech startups — with just $228M raised — achieved 90% survival and 70% follow-on funding.

I analyzed every pivot, every acquisition, every shutdown. I mapped 72 subsectors across 8 years. I tracked which business models live and which struggle to survive.

Here’s what the numbers actually say.

The Survival Spectrum: Why Most Startups Fail

Across 72 subsectors and 293 companies, survival rates cluster into predictable tiers based on a simple formula: B2B + Essential Services + Recurring Revenue + Regulatory Tailwinds.

🟢 The 100% Survival Tier

The Pattern: Companies selling what businesses can’t operate without.

Examples:

• HR & Payroll SaaS: SeamlessHR ($12.4M), PaidHR ($2.9M)
• Tech Skills Bootcamps (ISA Model): Decagon, Semicolon, Bildup AI — ALL operating
• Energy-as-a-Service (PAYG): Rensource ($44.5M), Watt ($29M) — ALL 5 operating
• Digital Identity & RegTech: Seamfix, YouVerify, Prembly — 100% survival (CBN KYC mandate)
• Pharma Supply Chain: Remedial ($17.4M), Field Intelligence, DrugStoc — ALL operating
• B2B FMCG Distribution: TradeDepot ($123M), Omnibiz ($18M) — ALL 6 operating.

🟢 The 90–99% Survival Tier

Neobanks (Digital Banking): 92.9% survival — Moniepoint ($423M), OPay ($570M), Kuda ($91.6M)

But here’s the catch: 14 companies competing for the same market. Massive capital requirements. 67% follow-on rate (vs CleanTech’s 100% subsectors).

High survival, yes. But also high competition and capital intensity.

🟡 The 80–89% Survival Tier

The “pretty good but crowded” zone:

• Payment Infrastructure/BaaS: 85.7% — Flutterwave ($465M), Interswitch
• Agricultural Finance: 80% — Babban Gona ($27.7M), ThriveAgric ($65.6M)
• Consumer Credit/BNPL: 80% — CredPal ($16.8M), Aella

🟠 The 50–69% Survival Tier: The Mixed Bag

• Crypto/Web3: 53.8% — Canza, Busha, Yellow Card (7 of 13 operating)
• B2B SaaS & Enterprise: 53.8% — Wakanow, JUDY (7 of 13 operating)
• Logistics & Last-mile: 66.7% — Sendbox, Kwik, Renda (8 of 12 operating)
• WealthTech: 63.6% — Bamboo ($16.6M), PiggyVest, Cowrywise (7 of 11 operating)

Some winners emerge. Many fail. The difference? Execution, not category.

🔴 The 0–32% Survival Tier: THE GRAVEYARD

This is where dreams die.

The Death Zone:

• 54gene (Genomics): $44.8M raised → SHUTDOWN
• Farmcrowdy (Ag Crowdfunding): $7.9M raised → SHUTDOWN (pivot failed)
• EdTech Student Financing: 0% survival — ScholarX, Schoolable ALL failed
• E-commerce Enablement/SaaS: 0% — Kitcart, Momma’s Bay ALL dormant
• Loyalty/Rewards: 0% — ThankUCash ($5.3M) dormant
• SME Lending: 33.3% — Lidya ($19.7M) shutdown
• Consumer Marketplaces: 22.2% — Kippa ($3.2M) dormant

Why they fail:

• Low willingness to pay
• Capital-intensive operations without revenue
• Long R&D cycles without product-market fit
• Consumer financing without collections infrastructure

The graveyard is predictable.

The $200M Exit That Changed Everything

Let’s talk about acquisitions. Because they reveal which business models actually work.

🏆 The Big One

Stripe → Acquired Paystack (2020) — $200M

• Subsector: Payment Gateways | Raised $8M
• Result: Largest Nigerian exit. Stripe needed African market access, Paystack delivered.

🌍 Strategic Acquisitions (Big Companies Buying Startups)

Shell → Acquired Daystar Power (2021)

• Subsector: Solar/Off-Grid C&I | Raised $68M
• Result: Oil giant’s clean energy pivot. Shell bought Nigerian market access + installed solar capacity.

Risevest → Acquired Chaka (2023)

• Subsector: WealthTech Investments | Raised $1.5M
• Result: WealthTech consolidation. Buying competitor for user base + tech stack. Classic acqui-hire.

🔄 Ecosystem Consolidation (Winners Buy Losers)

Paystack → Acquired Brass (2024)

• Subsector: Neobanking B2B | Raised $1.7M
• Result: Payment winners buying banking losers. Paystack (now Stripe-owned) consolidating B2B banking.

C-One Ventures → Acquired Bankly (2025)

• Subsector: Agency Banking/POS | Raised $2M

MFS Africa → Acquired Baxi (2021–2022)

• Subsector: Agency Banking/POS | Raised $500K
• Result: Pan-African payments consolidation. MFS Africa building regional footprint through acquisitions.

🚗 Other Notable Exits

• Carbon/OneFi → Acquired Amplify (2019) — Payment Processing
• Fixit45 → Acquired iFixng (2021) — Auto-Care Services
• WhoGoHost → Acquired Sendchamp — Cloud Communications

💰 Meanwhile: The Acquirers

Three Nigerian startups became buyers themselves:

• Chowdeck → Acquired Mira POS (2025) — Food delivery buying payments
• LemFi → Acquired Pillar & Buttercrane — Cross-border consolidation
• PiggyVest → Acquired PocketApp (2022) — Savings app consolidation

The Pattern:

• Payment infrastructure attracts acquirers
• Fintech dominates exits (75%)
• Early-stage companies (<$10M raised) most likely to exit
• Strategic buyers (Stripe, Shell) pay premiums for market access

The exits are predictable too.

28 Companies That Pivoted — And What Happened

Pivots reveal which strategic moves actually work. I tracked 28 companies that changed direction. Here’s what happened.

✅ The Successful Pivots

1. Payhippo → became Rivy: The Sector Escape

• Original: SME Lending (Fintech)
• Pivot: Clean Energy Financing (CleanTech)
• Funding: $4M
• Status: OPERATING

Result: Smart escape from a failing subsector (SME Lending 33% survival) to a thriving sector (CleanTech 90% survival). They kept the lending model, changed the customer base.

This is genius. They recognized the business model worked — but the sector didn’t.

2. Carbon/OneFi: The B2C → B2B Shift

• Original: Consumer neobank
• Pivot: AI-powered SME banking + BaaS infrastructure
• Funding: $5M
• Status: OPERATING

Result: Consumer banking is commoditized. B2B infrastructure has pricing power. Now they’re selling banking-as-a-service to other fintechs.

3. OPay: The Focus Play

• Original: Super-app (fintech + food delivery + ride-hailing)
• Pivot: Fintech only
• Funding: $570M
• Status: OPERATING

Result: They killed food delivery and ride-hailing. Focused entirely on payments and agency banking. Strategic focus beats trying everything. Now valued at billions.

4. Zone (AppZone): The Infrastructure Pivot

• Original: Cloud SaaS
• Pivot: Decentralized payment switch (fiat + crypto)
• Funding: $18.8M as Zone
• Status: OPERATING

Result: Payment rails = better business than SaaS. Raised $8.5M after the pivot.

5. Nomba (KUDI.AI): The Product Expansion

• Original: Agency Banking/POS
• Pivot: Omni-channel Business Banking + POS Infrastructure
• Funding: $5M+
• Status: OPERATING

Result: Expanded from POS to full banking stack. Product expansion works when you own distribution.

Other Successful Pivots:

• ThriveAgric: Retail crowdfunding → Institutional funding (OPERATING)
• Vendease: B2B agro wholesale → Added BNPL/Credit (OPERATING, $33.3M raised)
• Aella: Lending → Insurance + Payments + Investments (OPERATING)
• Kora: Blockchain → Traditional payment infrastructure (OPERATING)
• Lendsqr: Loan management → Full lending stack + APIs (OPERATING)
• MAX: Ride-hailing → EV focus + financing (OPERATING, $39M raised)

❌ The Failed Pivots: A Cautionary Tale

Farmcrowdy: The Cautionary Tale

• Original: Agricultural crowdfunding
• Pivot: B2B agricultural tech + logistics (March 2021)
• Funding: $7.9M
• Status: SHUTDOWN

Result: The pivot didn’t save them. You can’t pivot WITHIN a fundamentally broken category. Ag Crowdfunding has 0% survival. They should’ve pivoted sectors entirely like Payhippo did.

BuyCoins → Helicarrier

• Original: Crypto exchange
• Pivot: Crypto remittance
• Funding: $7.2M
• Status: DORMANT

Result: Pivoting within a struggling crypto space didn’t help. Dormant after pivot.

The Pivot Lessons:

✅ What Works:

• B2C → B2B pivots
• Sector pivots (Fintech → CleanTech)
• Product expansion when you own distribution
• Strategic focus over diversification

❌ What Doesn’t:

• Pivoting WITHIN failing categories
• Rebranding without business model change
• Diversifying when core business is broken

50 Rebrands: Growth Signals, Not Desperation

Rebrands reveal company maturity. I tracked 50 name changes. Here’s what they mean.

📈 Growth Rebrands: International Expansion

• Plentywaka → Treepz: Expanding beyond Nigeria
• Lemonade Finance → LemFi: Cross-border remittance focus ($86.9M raised)
• Geegpay → Raenest: Full rebrand/unification ($14.5M raised)

🏦 Strategic Rebrands: Product Maturity

• TeamApt → Moniepoint: Consumer neobank focus ($423M raised) — MASSIVE success
• KUDI.AI → Nomba: Omni-channel banking ($5M+)
• AppZone → Zone: Payment network pivot ($18.8M)
• OneFi → Carbon: Consumer brand focus
• Piggybank.ng → PiggyVest: Investment platform expansion

🔧 Tech Stack Rebrands

• Wizter → Waza: B2B trade expansion ($8.5M)
• Jand2Gidi → CargoPlug: Cross-border logistics focus
• Pada HCM → PaidHR: Product maturity ($2.9M)

❌ Failed Rebrands (Rare)

Only 5 out of 50 rebrands failed:

• ScholarX → Learnly: DORMANT (EdTech student financing)
• ThankUCash → Store Smart: DORMANT (Loyalty/Rewards)
• BuyCoins → Helicarrier: DORMANT (Crypto)
• Schoolable → Allprotech: SHUTDOWN

The Rebrand Lesson: 90% success rate. Rebrands signal growth (international expansion, product maturity, strategic focus). Failed rebrands were in failing subsectors (student financing 0%, loyalty 0%, crypto 53%). Name changes don’t save bad business models.

The Numbers: 8 Years of Funding Data

I built 3 interactive Tableau dashboards with every funding round, company, and outcome. Here are the highlights.

📊 The Big Picture

The Numbers:

• $4.17B total funding across 293 companies
• 528 total deals (2018–2025)
• 70% overall survival rate
• 8 sectors, 72 subsectors analyzed

Top Companies by Funding:

1. OPay: $570M (Neobanking)
2. Flutterwave: $465M (Payments)
3. Moniepoint: $423M (Neobanking)
4. AFEX: $323M (AgriTech Commodity Trading)
5. Interswitch: $110M (Payments)

Sector Breakdown:

• Fintech: $2.66B (64% of all funding), 106 companies, 184 deals
• AgriTech: $439M, 24 companies
• Digital Commerce: $408M, 42 companies
• CleanTech: $228M, 20 companies (90% survival!)
• HealthTech: $180M, 27 companies (82% survival)

📈 Funding Evolution: The Boom, Crash, and Recovery

The year-by-year breakdown tells the real story.

2018: The Foundation (72 deals)

• Total funding: $120.8M
• Biggest deal: Wakanow ($40M) — Travel Tech (Enterprise)
• Other notable deals: Kora ($12M), Paga ($10M), Flutterwave ($10M), Paystack ($8M)
• Average deal: $1.7M
• Key milestone: Ecosystem beginning. Travel Tech surprises with largest deal.

2019: Early Growth (93 deals)

• Total funding: $444.9M
• Biggest deal: OPay ($170M) — Neobanking mega-round
• Other notable deals: Andela ($100M HRTech), PalmPay ($40M), Kobo360 ($30M), Rensource Energy ($20M)
• Average deal: $4.8M (+182% from 2018)
• Key milestone: First $100M+ deal in Nigerian startup history

2020: COVID Acceleration (75 deals)

• Total funding: $163.3M
• Biggest deal: Flutterwave ($35M) — Payment Infrastructure
• Other notable deals: 54gene ($15M HealthTech), TradeDepot ($10M), KudaBank ($10M)
• Average deal: $2.3M (-52% drop due to pandemic uncertainty)
• Key milestone: More deals than 2018, but smaller sizes. Investors cautious.

2021: THE BOOM YEAR (125 deals) 🚀

• Total funding: $1.48B
• Biggest deal: OPay ($400M) — Neobanking Series C ← BIGGEST DEAL EVER
• Other mega-deals: Flutterwave ($170M), AFEX ($115M AgriTech), TradeDepot ($110M), PalmPay ($100M)
• Average deal: $12.9M (+461% from 2020!)
• Key milestones:
• First $1B+ year
• 125 deals = PEAK DEAL COUNT
• Global tech boom
• Tiger Global aggressive in Africa

This was the peak. It wouldn’t last.

2022: Mega-Round Consolidation (50 deals)

• Total funding: $1.13B
• Biggest deal: Flutterwave ($250M) — Unicorn valuation ($3B)
• Other mega-deals: Moove ($182M), AFEX ($175M), Interswitch ($110M), ThriveAgric ($56M)
• Average deal: $23.1M (+79% from 2021) ← PEAK AVERAGE DEAL SIZE
• Key milestone: Fewer deals but MUCH larger sizes = late-stage consolidation

2023: THE CRASH (40 deals) 💥

• Total funding: $160.6M
• Biggest deal: LemFi ($33M) — Cross-border payments
• Other notable deals: Helium Health ($30M), FairMoney ($30M), Rensource Energy ($15M)
• Average deal: $5.0M (-78% from 2022!)
• Key milestones:
• Deal count collapsed 68%
• Funding dropped 86%
• Global tech winter
• SVB collapse
• VC pullback

The crash was brutal.

2024: Bottoming Out (44 deals)

• Total funding: $254.1M
• Biggest deal: Moniepoint ($110M) — Neobanking dominance
• Other notable deals: Yellow Card ($33M), Beacon Power Services ($30M CleanTech), Watt Renewable ($15M)
• Average deal: $6.9M (+38% recovery from 2023)
• Key milestone: Green shoots of recovery. Mega-rounds return.

2025: Recovery Begins (29 deals to date)

• Total funding: $419.8M
• Biggest deal: Moniepoint ($200M) — Another mega-round
• Other notable deals: LemFi ($53M), Stitches Africa ($50M Fashion), Kredete ($22M), Gigmile ($21M)
• Average deal: $14.5M (+110% from 2024)
• Key milestone: Deal sizes approaching 2021–2022 levels, but deal count still low

The Pattern:

→ 2018–2019: Foundation era (72–93 deals, $1.7–4.8M average)

→ 2020: COVID pause (75 deals, $2.3M average)

→ 2021: THE BOOM (125 deals, $12.9M average) — PEAK DEAL COUNT

→ 2022: Mega-round consolidation (50 deals, $23.1M average) — PEAK DEAL SIZE

→ 2023: THE CRASH (40 deals, $5.0M average) — 68% deal count drop, 86% funding drop

→ 2024–2025: Recovery (29–44 deals, $6.9–14.5M average) — Deal sizes recovering faster than volume

Total verified deals (2018–2025): 528 ✅

🎯 The Investment Matrix: Where Smart Money Goes

This is the most important chart.

I mapped every sector by Survival Rate (Y-axis) vs Follow-On Funding Rate (X-axis).

🟢 Top-Right Quadrant (GREEN — Best Bets):

• CleanTech: 90% survival, 70% follow-on
• HealthTech: 82% survival, 63% follow-on
• HRTech: 80% survival, 60% follow-on

These are the capital-efficient winners.

🟠 Middle Quadrant (ORANGE — Moderate Risk):

• Fintech: 73% survival, 40% follow-on (overcrowded, capital-intensive)
• EdTech: 70% survival, 39% follow-on
• Digital Commerce: 67% survival, 36% follow-on

🔴 Bottom-Left Quadrant (RED — High Risk):

• AgriTech: 50% survival, 50% follow-on (WORST position)
• B2B Enterprise SaaS: 63% survival, 22% follow-on (LOWEST follow-on rate)

The Fintech Paradox:

Fintech captured 64% of all funding but has the WORST follow-on rate (40%) among major sectors.

Why?

• Overcrowding (106 companies)
• Commoditization
• High capital requirements
• Investor fatigue

What This Means For You

After analyzing $4.17B across 293 companies, here’s what actually matters.

What Works (80–100% Survival):

• B2B SaaS with regulatory tailwinds (HR, RegTech, School Management)
• Essential infrastructure (Payments, Pharma Supply Chain, FMCG Distribution)
• Recurring revenue models (Energy-as-a-Service, Subscriptions)
• Capital-light tech plays (Coding Bootcamps with ISAs)

What Doesn’t (0–33% Survival):

• Consumer lending without collections infrastructure
• Agricultural crowdfunding platforms
• Student financing products
• Hardware with long R&D cycles (Genomics, Medical Devices)
• Loyalty/rewards programs

Pivot Playbook:

• B2C → B2B works
• Sector pivots work (Fintech → CleanTech)
• Product expansion works when you own distribution
• Don’t pivot WITHIN failing categories

Infrastructure plays > Consumer apps consistently

Payment infrastructure = proven acquisition target (Paystack $200M)

key take away:

1. Regulatory frameworks create or destroy subsectors (RegTech 100% due to CBN KYC)
2. Fix collections infrastructure to enable lending (currently 0–58% survival)
3. Strengthen CleanTech incentives (already 90% survival, can grow sector)
4. Support B2B infrastructure over consumer apps for economic impact

Explore the Data Yourself

I built 3 interactive Tableau dashboards with:

• Every funding round (528 deals)
• Every company outcome (293 companies)
• Survival rates by subsector (72 subsectors)
• Year-over-year funding trends
• Investment matrix by sector

Filter by sector, subsector, or funding stage. See which business models actually work.

https://public.tableau.com/views/NIGERIANSTARTUPECOSYSTEMANALYSIS20182025/HOME?:language=en-US&publish=yes&:sid=&:redirect=auth&:display_count=n&:origin=viz_share_link

The Bottom Line

Sector < Subsector < Business Model

The survivors aren’t lucky. They’re predictable.

They chose:

• B2B over B2C
• Essential over nice-to-have
• Recurring over one-time
• Infrastructure over consumer apps

The data doesn’t lie.

The Nigerian Startup Ecosystem Deep Dive: $4.17B | 293 Companies | 528 Deals was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.