The post Fred Thiel: AI’s urgent energy demands reshape bitcoin mining, international markets offer new opportunities, and modular data centers drive efficiencyThe post Fred Thiel: AI’s urgent energy demands reshape bitcoin mining, international markets offer new opportunities, and modular data centers drive efficiency

Fred Thiel: AI’s urgent energy demands reshape bitcoin mining, international markets offer new opportunities, and modular data centers drive efficiency


Public bitcoin miners are pivoting to AI and high-performance computing amid shifting energy landscapes.

Key takeaways

  • The demand for energy from the AI sector is immediate and high, reflecting the urgency in energy provisioning.
  • Hyperscalers prioritize bringing capacity online quickly, often over cost considerations, to maintain competitive advantage.
  • International markets offer more economically viable opportunities for bitcoin mining compared to the US
  • Excess energy in countries like Saudi Arabia and France is underutilized due to inadequate grid connections.
  • The cost of bitcoin mining capacity is at an all-time low due to oversupply and reduced demand.
  • Public miners are shifting focus towards high-performance computing (HPC) and AI, impacting the demand for new mining equipment.
  • Modularizing data centers can cut infrastructure costs and boost efficiency in AI inference.
  • Revenue in the AI sector is predominantly driven by inference processes.
  • Data center providers are increasingly becoming energy developers to meet future operational needs.
  • AI technologies are eroding the value traditionally held by software systems by automating insights.
  • The strategic focus of hyperscalers on capacity wars underscores the importance of operational readiness.
  • The shift of public miners towards HPC and AI reflects a broader industry trend impacting bitcoin mining dynamics.
  • The economic viability of international markets for bitcoin mining is influenced by lower AI demand and energy availability.
  • Modular data centers offer a solution to high infrastructure costs, particularly in AI applications.
  • The erosion of software value by AI highlights the transformative impact of technology on traditional business models.

Guest intro

Fred Thiel is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Marathon Digital Holdings (NASDAQ: MARA), one of the largest publicly traded bitcoin mining companies. He joined the company in 2018 as a director and became CEO in 2021, overseeing its growth from a market cap under $30 million to over $5 billion. Under his leadership, Marathon has expanded bitcoin mining operations across four continents while emphasizing energy and infrastructure strategies.

The urgent energy demands of AI

  • — Fred Thiel

  • Immediate energy needs are driven by the high-performance computing (HPC) requirements of AI.
  • Hyperscalers are in a capacity war, focusing on who can run more GPUs.
  • — Fred Thiel

  • The timing of bringing capacity online is prioritized over cost by hyperscalers.
  • The AI sector’s energy demands are shaping market dynamics and strategic decisions.
  • The focus on operational readiness is critical for maintaining competitive advantage.
  • Energy provisioning for AI is a key factor influencing infrastructure development.
  • The urgency in energy demand reflects the rapid growth and importance of AI technologies.

International opportunities in bitcoin mining

  • — Fred Thiel

  • International markets are more economically viable for bitcoin mining than the US
  • Lower demand for AI and hyperscale capacity abroad creates opportunities for mining.
  • Excess energy in countries like Saudi Arabia and France is underutilized.
  • — Fred Thiel

  • The lack of grid connections limits the effective use of available energy resources.
  • Energy market dynamics vary significantly between the US and international regions.
  • Strategic shifts in mining operations are driven by regional energy availability.
  • International growth in mining is influenced by economic and infrastructural factors.

The current state of bitcoin mining capacity

  • — Fred Thiel

  • Bitcoin mining capacity costs are at an all-time low due to oversupply.
  • Reduced demand for mining rigs is linked to strategic shifts by public miners.
  • — Fred Thiel

  • Public miners are increasingly focusing on high-performance computing (HPC) and AI.
  • The shift in focus impacts future demand and investment in mining infrastructure.
  • Current market dynamics are shaped by economic factors affecting pricing.
  • The oversupply of mining capacity reflects broader industry trends.
  • Strategic changes by public miners highlight the evolving landscape of bitcoin mining.

Modularizing data centers for AI efficiency

  • — Fred Thiel

  • Modular data centers can significantly reduce infrastructure costs.
  • Efficiency improvements in AI inference are achieved through modularization.
  • The cost of data centers is a critical factor in AI infrastructure development.
  • Modularization offers a solution to the high costs associated with traditional data centers.
  • Revenue generation in AI is primarily driven by inference processes.
  • — Fred Thiel

  • The focus on inference highlights its importance in the AI business model.
  • Modular data centers align with the strategic needs of AI applications.

Data centers as energy developers

  • — Fred Thiel

  • Data center providers are increasingly becoming energy developers.
  • The shift towards energy generation addresses operational capacity needs.
  • Building energy infrastructure involves significant timelines and challenges.
  • The strategic focus on energy development reflects broader industry trends.
  • Operational challenges in energy provisioning influence data center strategies.
  • The relationship between data centers and energy production is evolving.
  • Energy development is a critical component of future data center operations.
  • The shift highlights the importance of energy infrastructure in data center planning.

AI’s impact on traditional software value

  • — Fred Thiel

  • AI technologies are eroding the value traditionally held by software systems.
  • The automation of insights by AI impacts traditional software business models.
  • The competitive landscape in the tech industry is shifting due to AI advancements.
  • AI’s impact on software highlights the transformative nature of technology.
  • The erosion of software value underscores the need for adaptation in the industry.
  • AI technologies offer new ways to generate insights traditionally provided by humans.
  • The strategic implications of AI on software systems are significant.
  • The shift reflects broader industry trends towards automation and efficiency.

Public bitcoin miners are pivoting to AI and high-performance computing amid shifting energy landscapes.

Key takeaways

  • The demand for energy from the AI sector is immediate and high, reflecting the urgency in energy provisioning.
  • Hyperscalers prioritize bringing capacity online quickly, often over cost considerations, to maintain competitive advantage.
  • International markets offer more economically viable opportunities for bitcoin mining compared to the US
  • Excess energy in countries like Saudi Arabia and France is underutilized due to inadequate grid connections.
  • The cost of bitcoin mining capacity is at an all-time low due to oversupply and reduced demand.
  • Public miners are shifting focus towards high-performance computing (HPC) and AI, impacting the demand for new mining equipment.
  • Modularizing data centers can cut infrastructure costs and boost efficiency in AI inference.
  • Revenue in the AI sector is predominantly driven by inference processes.
  • Data center providers are increasingly becoming energy developers to meet future operational needs.
  • AI technologies are eroding the value traditionally held by software systems by automating insights.
  • The strategic focus of hyperscalers on capacity wars underscores the importance of operational readiness.
  • The shift of public miners towards HPC and AI reflects a broader industry trend impacting bitcoin mining dynamics.
  • The economic viability of international markets for bitcoin mining is influenced by lower AI demand and energy availability.
  • Modular data centers offer a solution to high infrastructure costs, particularly in AI applications.
  • The erosion of software value by AI highlights the transformative impact of technology on traditional business models.

Guest intro

Fred Thiel is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Marathon Digital Holdings (NASDAQ: MARA), one of the largest publicly traded bitcoin mining companies. He joined the company in 2018 as a director and became CEO in 2021, overseeing its growth from a market cap under $30 million to over $5 billion. Under his leadership, Marathon has expanded bitcoin mining operations across four continents while emphasizing energy and infrastructure strategies.

The urgent energy demands of AI

  • — Fred Thiel

  • Immediate energy needs are driven by the high-performance computing (HPC) requirements of AI.
  • Hyperscalers are in a capacity war, focusing on who can run more GPUs.
  • — Fred Thiel

  • The timing of bringing capacity online is prioritized over cost by hyperscalers.
  • The AI sector’s energy demands are shaping market dynamics and strategic decisions.
  • The focus on operational readiness is critical for maintaining competitive advantage.
  • Energy provisioning for AI is a key factor influencing infrastructure development.
  • The urgency in energy demand reflects the rapid growth and importance of AI technologies.

International opportunities in bitcoin mining

  • — Fred Thiel

  • International markets are more economically viable for bitcoin mining than the US
  • Lower demand for AI and hyperscale capacity abroad creates opportunities for mining.
  • Excess energy in countries like Saudi Arabia and France is underutilized.
  • — Fred Thiel

  • The lack of grid connections limits the effective use of available energy resources.
  • Energy market dynamics vary significantly between the US and international regions.
  • Strategic shifts in mining operations are driven by regional energy availability.
  • International growth in mining is influenced by economic and infrastructural factors.

The current state of bitcoin mining capacity

  • — Fred Thiel

  • Bitcoin mining capacity costs are at an all-time low due to oversupply.
  • Reduced demand for mining rigs is linked to strategic shifts by public miners.
  • — Fred Thiel

  • Public miners are increasingly focusing on high-performance computing (HPC) and AI.
  • The shift in focus impacts future demand and investment in mining infrastructure.
  • Current market dynamics are shaped by economic factors affecting pricing.
  • The oversupply of mining capacity reflects broader industry trends.
  • Strategic changes by public miners highlight the evolving landscape of bitcoin mining.

Modularizing data centers for AI efficiency

  • — Fred Thiel

  • Modular data centers can significantly reduce infrastructure costs.
  • Efficiency improvements in AI inference are achieved through modularization.
  • The cost of data centers is a critical factor in AI infrastructure development.
  • Modularization offers a solution to the high costs associated with traditional data centers.
  • Revenue generation in AI is primarily driven by inference processes.
  • — Fred Thiel

  • The focus on inference highlights its importance in the AI business model.
  • Modular data centers align with the strategic needs of AI applications.

Data centers as energy developers

  • — Fred Thiel

  • Data center providers are increasingly becoming energy developers.
  • The shift towards energy generation addresses operational capacity needs.
  • Building energy infrastructure involves significant timelines and challenges.
  • The strategic focus on energy development reflects broader industry trends.
  • Operational challenges in energy provisioning influence data center strategies.
  • The relationship between data centers and energy production is evolving.
  • Energy development is a critical component of future data center operations.
  • The shift highlights the importance of energy infrastructure in data center planning.

AI’s impact on traditional software value

  • — Fred Thiel

  • AI technologies are eroding the value traditionally held by software systems.
  • The automation of insights by AI impacts traditional software business models.
  • The competitive landscape in the tech industry is shifting due to AI advancements.
  • AI’s impact on software highlights the transformative nature of technology.
  • The erosion of software value underscores the need for adaptation in the industry.
  • AI technologies offer new ways to generate insights traditionally provided by humans.
  • The strategic implications of AI on software systems are significant.
  • The shift reflects broader industry trends towards automation and efficiency.

Loading more articles…

You’ve reached the end


Add us on Google

`;
}

function createMobileArticle(article) {
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `

${article.imageCaption}

` : ”;
const authorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;

return `


${captionHtml}

${article.subheadline ? `

${article.subheadline}

` : ”}

${createSocialShare()}

${authorHtml}
${displayDate}

${article.content}

`;
}

function createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml) {
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `

${article.imageCaption}

` : ”;
const categoriesHtml = article.categories.map((cat, i) => {
const separator = i < article.categories.length – 1 ? ‘|‘ : ”;
return `${cat}${separator}`;
}).join(”);
const desktopAuthorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;

return `

${categoriesHtml}

${article.subheadline ? `

${article.subheadline}

` : ”}

${desktopAuthorHtml}
${displayDate}
${createSocialShare()}

${captionHtml}

`;
}

function loadMoreArticles() {
if (isLoading || !hasMore) return;

isLoading = true;
loadingText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);

// Build form data for AJAX request
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append(‘action’, ‘cb_lovable_load_more’);
formData.append(‘current_post_id’, lastLoadedPostId);
formData.append(‘primary_cat_id’, primaryCatId);
formData.append(‘before_date’, lastLoadedDate);
formData.append(‘loaded_ids’, loadedPostIds.join(‘,’));

fetch(ajaxUrl, {
method: ‘POST’,
body: formData
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);

if (data.success && data.has_more && data.article) {
const article = data.article;
const sidebarAdHtml = data.sidebar_ad_html || ”;

// Check for duplicates
if (loadedPostIds.includes(article.id)) {
console.log(‘Duplicate article detected, skipping:’, article.id);
// Update pagination vars and try again
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;
loadMoreArticles();
return;
}

// Add to mobile container
mobileContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createMobileArticle(article));

// Add to desktop container with fresh ad HTML
desktopContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml));

// Update tracking variables
loadedPostIds.push(article.id);
lastLoadedPostId = article.id;
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;

// Execute any inline scripts in the new content (for ads)
const newArticle = desktopContainer.querySelector(`article[data-article-id=”${article.id}”]`);
if (newArticle) {
const scripts = newArticle.querySelectorAll(‘script’);
scripts.forEach(script => {
const newScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
if (script.src) {
newScript.src = script.src;
} else {
newScript.textContent = script.textContent;
}
document.body.appendChild(newScript);
});
}

// Trigger Ad Inserter if available
if (typeof ai_check_and_insert_block === ‘function’) {
ai_check_and_insert_block();
}

// Trigger Google Publisher Tag refresh if available
if (typeof googletag !== ‘undefined’ && googletag.pubads) {
googletag.cmd.push(function() {
googletag.pubads().refresh();
});
}

} else if (data.success && !data.has_more) {
hasMore = false;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
} else if (!data.success) {
console.error(‘AJAX error:’, data.error);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
}
})
.catch(error => {
console.error(‘Fetch error:’, error);
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
});
}

// Set up IntersectionObserver
const observer = new IntersectionObserver(function(entries) {
if (entries[0].isIntersecting) {
loadMoreArticles();
}
}, { threshold: 0.1 });

observer.observe(loadingTrigger);
})();

© Decentral Media and Crypto Briefing® 2026.

Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/fred-thiel-ais-urgent-energy-demands-reshape-bitcoin-mining-international-markets-offer-new-opportunities-and-modular-data-centers-drive-efficiency-the-pomp-podcast/

Market Opportunity
Fred Logo
Fred Price(FRED)
$0.0004867
$0.0004867$0.0004867
+2.65%
USD
Fred (FRED) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

The post XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple [XRP] remains one of the top five cryptocurrencies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 08:49
Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026?

Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026?

The post Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is trading around $68,700, down nearly 22% year to date
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 08:59