The post Brent Johnson: Dedollarization is complex and unlikely, the Dollar Milkshake Theory reveals market impacts, and a currency crisis is mathematically inevitableThe post Brent Johnson: Dedollarization is complex and unlikely, the Dollar Milkshake Theory reveals market impacts, and a currency crisis is mathematically inevitable

Brent Johnson: Dedollarization is complex and unlikely, the Dollar Milkshake Theory reveals market impacts, and a currency crisis is mathematically inevitable


The desire for dedollarization exists but is complex to achieve. The Dollar Milkshake Theory outlines how sovereign debt crises impact markets. US assets are predicted to outperform due to superior market structure.

Key takeaways

  • The desire for dedollarization exists but is complex to achieve.
  • The Dollar Milkshake Theory outlines how sovereign debt crises impact markets.
  • US assets are predicted to outperform due to superior market structure.
  • Central banks have managed to prevent a sovereign debt crisis so far.
  • A currency crisis is inevitable due to the monetary system’s design.
  • Central banks’ primary role is to perpetuate the state by acting as lenders of last resort.
  • The system’s design mandates growth, making gradual unwinding unlikely.
  • A crisis is inevitable, but its timing is uncertain due to potential growth from technology.
  • Betting against central banks’ ability to manage challenges is risky.
  • The dollar has significantly impacted other reserve currencies since 2021.
  • The world is more dependent on the US dollar today than ever before.
  • The euro dollar network is the largest for dollar-based transactions outside the US.
  • The narrative around dedollarization often misunderstands the complexity of the issue.
  • The dollar’s status as the global reserve currency is due to private market preferences.
  • The US dollar is expected to strengthen against other fiat currencies in the long term.

Guest intro

Brent Johnson is CEO of Santiago Capital, an investment firm focused on macro strategy and capital allocation. He developed the Dollar Milkshake Theory in 2018 to explain how the US dollar absorbs global liquidity during debt crises, a framework that has guided his analysis of currency markets and capital flows over the past several years. Johnson has become a prominent voice on the structural dynamics of the dollar-based monetary system, including the role of the Eurodollar market and how emerging technologies like stablecoins may reshape dollar hegemony.

The complexities of dedollarization

  • — Brent Johnson

  • The geopolitical implications of the US dollar as the global reserve currency create challenges for dedollarization.
  • The Dollar Milkshake Theory provides a framework for understanding how debt crises affect markets.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • US assets are predicted to outperform due to their market structure.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Governments and central banks have managed to prevent a sovereign debt crisis so far.
  • — Brent Johnson

The inevitability of a currency crisis

  • A currency crisis is inevitable due to the monetary system’s design.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The monetary system requires constant growth due to interest on loans.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The primary role of central banks is to perpetuate the state by acting as lenders of last resort.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Gradual unwinding of the system over a long period is unlikely.
  • — Brent Johnson

The role of central banks in economic stability

  • Central banks must prevent economic contraction and stimulate growth.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • A crisis is inevitable, but its timing is uncertain due to potential growth from technology.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Betting against central banks’ ability to manage challenges is risky.
  • — Brent Johnson

The dollar’s impact on global currencies

  • The dollar has significantly impacted other reserve currencies since 2021.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • There is a growing desire for dedollarization globally.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The world is more dependent on the US dollar today than ever before.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The euro dollar network is the largest for dollar-based transactions outside the US.
  • — Brent Johnson

Misunderstandings about dedollarization

  • The narrative around dedollarization often misunderstands the complexity of the issue.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The dollar’s status as the global reserve currency is due to private market preferences.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The narrative of dedollarization lacks material change despite discussions among BRICS nations.
  • — Brent Johnson

The future of the US dollar

  • The US dollar is expected to strengthen against other fiat currencies in the long term.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The dollar’s strength is not due to its own merits but rather the troubles faced by other economies.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The dollar’s value relative to other currencies can rise during global crises.
  • — Brent Johnson

Stablecoins and their geopolitical implications

  • The US will not allow stablecoins to undermine the dollar’s dominance.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The US is using stablecoins to extend its dollar network globally.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The world may adopt US dollar stablecoins as the preferred medium of exchange.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Stablecoins can be a stealth weapon for the US to exert power over other nations.
  • — Brent Johnson

The potential growth of stablecoins

  • Stablecoins could easily reach a market size of $3 trillion, with potential estimates going as high as $10 trillion.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Stablecoins can serve as a geopolitical tool for the US to exert more control over the dollar network globally.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank was significantly influenced by technology enabling rapid withdrawals.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The adoption of stablecoins in developing countries could accelerate the effects of the Dollar Milkshake Theory.
  • — Brent Johnson

The strategic use of stablecoins in crisis situations

  • Stablecoins could enable rapid dollarization in countries facing currency crises.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The technology behind stablecoins can significantly accelerate the process of dollarization.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The potential for a ‘stablecoin style Arab Spring’ exists, where stablecoins could catalyze revolutions.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The military has established doctrines on using money as a weapon, which can be enhanced by new technologies like crypto.
  • — Brent Johnson

The geopolitical landscape and economic strategies

  • A global divorce between China and the United States is inevitable.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The dollar is predicted to be the best of the worst fiat currencies moving forward.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Investors should favor the United States markets over international options due to lower risk.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Owning gold is important as a hedge against debasement.
  • — Brent Johnson


The desire for dedollarization exists but is complex to achieve. The Dollar Milkshake Theory outlines how sovereign debt crises impact markets. US assets are predicted to outperform due to superior market structure.

Key takeaways

  • The desire for dedollarization exists but is complex to achieve.
  • The Dollar Milkshake Theory outlines how sovereign debt crises impact markets.
  • US assets are predicted to outperform due to superior market structure.
  • Central banks have managed to prevent a sovereign debt crisis so far.
  • A currency crisis is inevitable due to the monetary system’s design.
  • Central banks’ primary role is to perpetuate the state by acting as lenders of last resort.
  • The system’s design mandates growth, making gradual unwinding unlikely.
  • A crisis is inevitable, but its timing is uncertain due to potential growth from technology.
  • Betting against central banks’ ability to manage challenges is risky.
  • The dollar has significantly impacted other reserve currencies since 2021.
  • The world is more dependent on the US dollar today than ever before.
  • The euro dollar network is the largest for dollar-based transactions outside the US.
  • The narrative around dedollarization often misunderstands the complexity of the issue.
  • The dollar’s status as the global reserve currency is due to private market preferences.
  • The US dollar is expected to strengthen against other fiat currencies in the long term.

Guest intro

Brent Johnson is CEO of Santiago Capital, an investment firm focused on macro strategy and capital allocation. He developed the Dollar Milkshake Theory in 2018 to explain how the US dollar absorbs global liquidity during debt crises, a framework that has guided his analysis of currency markets and capital flows over the past several years. Johnson has become a prominent voice on the structural dynamics of the dollar-based monetary system, including the role of the Eurodollar market and how emerging technologies like stablecoins may reshape dollar hegemony.

The complexities of dedollarization

  • — Brent Johnson

  • The geopolitical implications of the US dollar as the global reserve currency create challenges for dedollarization.
  • The Dollar Milkshake Theory provides a framework for understanding how debt crises affect markets.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • US assets are predicted to outperform due to their market structure.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Governments and central banks have managed to prevent a sovereign debt crisis so far.
  • — Brent Johnson

The inevitability of a currency crisis

  • A currency crisis is inevitable due to the monetary system’s design.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The monetary system requires constant growth due to interest on loans.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The primary role of central banks is to perpetuate the state by acting as lenders of last resort.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Gradual unwinding of the system over a long period is unlikely.
  • — Brent Johnson

The role of central banks in economic stability

  • Central banks must prevent economic contraction and stimulate growth.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • A crisis is inevitable, but its timing is uncertain due to potential growth from technology.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Betting against central banks’ ability to manage challenges is risky.
  • — Brent Johnson

The dollar’s impact on global currencies

  • The dollar has significantly impacted other reserve currencies since 2021.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • There is a growing desire for dedollarization globally.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The world is more dependent on the US dollar today than ever before.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The euro dollar network is the largest for dollar-based transactions outside the US.
  • — Brent Johnson

Misunderstandings about dedollarization

  • The narrative around dedollarization often misunderstands the complexity of the issue.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The dollar’s status as the global reserve currency is due to private market preferences.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The narrative of dedollarization lacks material change despite discussions among BRICS nations.
  • — Brent Johnson

The future of the US dollar

  • The US dollar is expected to strengthen against other fiat currencies in the long term.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The dollar’s strength is not due to its own merits but rather the troubles faced by other economies.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The dollar’s value relative to other currencies can rise during global crises.
  • — Brent Johnson

Stablecoins and their geopolitical implications

  • The US will not allow stablecoins to undermine the dollar’s dominance.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The US is using stablecoins to extend its dollar network globally.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The world may adopt US dollar stablecoins as the preferred medium of exchange.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Stablecoins can be a stealth weapon for the US to exert power over other nations.
  • — Brent Johnson

The potential growth of stablecoins

  • Stablecoins could easily reach a market size of $3 trillion, with potential estimates going as high as $10 trillion.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Stablecoins can serve as a geopolitical tool for the US to exert more control over the dollar network globally.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank was significantly influenced by technology enabling rapid withdrawals.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The adoption of stablecoins in developing countries could accelerate the effects of the Dollar Milkshake Theory.
  • — Brent Johnson

The strategic use of stablecoins in crisis situations

  • Stablecoins could enable rapid dollarization in countries facing currency crises.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The technology behind stablecoins can significantly accelerate the process of dollarization.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The potential for a ‘stablecoin style Arab Spring’ exists, where stablecoins could catalyze revolutions.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The military has established doctrines on using money as a weapon, which can be enhanced by new technologies like crypto.
  • — Brent Johnson

The geopolitical landscape and economic strategies

  • A global divorce between China and the United States is inevitable.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • The dollar is predicted to be the best of the worst fiat currencies moving forward.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Investors should favor the United States markets over international options due to lower risk.
  • — Brent Johnson

  • Owning gold is important as a hedge against debasement.
  • — Brent Johnson

Loading more articles…

You’ve reached the end


Add us on Google

`;
}

function createMobileArticle(article) {
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `

${article.imageCaption}

` : ”;
const authorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;

return `


${captionHtml}

${article.subheadline ? `

${article.subheadline}

` : ”}

${createSocialShare()}

${authorHtml}
${displayDate}

${article.content}

`;
}

function createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml) {
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `

${article.imageCaption}

` : ”;
const categoriesHtml = article.categories.map((cat, i) => {
const separator = i < article.categories.length – 1 ? ‘|‘ : ”;
return `${cat}${separator}`;
}).join(”);
const desktopAuthorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;

return `

${categoriesHtml}

${article.subheadline ? `

${article.subheadline}

` : ”}

${desktopAuthorHtml}
${displayDate}
${createSocialShare()}

${captionHtml}

`;
}

function loadMoreArticles() {
if (isLoading || !hasMore) return;

isLoading = true;
loadingText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);

// Build form data for AJAX request
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append(‘action’, ‘cb_lovable_load_more’);
formData.append(‘current_post_id’, lastLoadedPostId);
formData.append(‘primary_cat_id’, primaryCatId);
formData.append(‘before_date’, lastLoadedDate);
formData.append(‘loaded_ids’, loadedPostIds.join(‘,’));

fetch(ajaxUrl, {
method: ‘POST’,
body: formData
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);

if (data.success && data.has_more && data.article) {
const article = data.article;
const sidebarAdHtml = data.sidebar_ad_html || ”;

// Check for duplicates
if (loadedPostIds.includes(article.id)) {
console.log(‘Duplicate article detected, skipping:’, article.id);
// Update pagination vars and try again
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;
loadMoreArticles();
return;
}

// Add to mobile container
mobileContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createMobileArticle(article));

// Add to desktop container with fresh ad HTML
desktopContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml));

// Update tracking variables
loadedPostIds.push(article.id);
lastLoadedPostId = article.id;
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;

// Execute any inline scripts in the new content (for ads)
const newArticle = desktopContainer.querySelector(`article[data-article-id=”${article.id}”]`);
if (newArticle) {
const scripts = newArticle.querySelectorAll(‘script’);
scripts.forEach(script => {
const newScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
if (script.src) {
newScript.src = script.src;
} else {
newScript.textContent = script.textContent;
}
document.body.appendChild(newScript);
});
}

// Trigger Ad Inserter if available
if (typeof ai_check_and_insert_block === ‘function’) {
ai_check_and_insert_block();
}

// Trigger Google Publisher Tag refresh if available
if (typeof googletag !== ‘undefined’ && googletag.pubads) {
googletag.cmd.push(function() {
googletag.pubads().refresh();
});
}

} else if (data.success && !data.has_more) {
hasMore = false;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
} else if (!data.success) {
console.error(‘AJAX error:’, data.error);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
}
})
.catch(error => {
console.error(‘Fetch error:’, error);
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
});
}

// Set up IntersectionObserver
const observer = new IntersectionObserver(function(entries) {
if (entries[0].isIntersecting) {
loadMoreArticles();
}
}, { threshold: 0.1 });

observer.observe(loadingTrigger);
})();

© Decentral Media and Crypto Briefing® 2026.

Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/brent-johnson-dedollarization-is-complex-and-unlikely-the-dollar-milkshake-theory-reveals-market-impacts-and-a-currency-crisis-is-mathematically-inevitable-bankless/

Market Opportunity
Farcana Logo
Farcana Price(FAR)
$0.000875
$0.000875$0.000875
+0.45%
USD
Farcana (FAR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

The post XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple [XRP] remains one of the top five cryptocurrencies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 08:49
Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026?

Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026?

The post Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is trading around $68,700, down nearly 22% year to date
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 08:59