The post LIT Technical Analysis Feb 18 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LIT is trading at $1.46 with a sharp 8.76% drop in the last 24 hours, and volatilityThe post LIT Technical Analysis Feb 18 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LIT is trading at $1.46 with a sharp 8.76% drop in the last 24 hours, and volatility

LIT Technical Analysis Feb 18

LIT is trading at $1.46 with a sharp 8.76% drop in the last 24 hours, and volatility is high within the sideways trend. Investors should size positions with tight stop loss levels ($1.27 below Supertrend resistance) and a 1-2% risk rule for capital protection, as Bitcoin’s downtrend increases altcoin risk.

Market Volatility and Risk Environment

LIT’s current volatility indicates a highly fluctuating environment with a daily range of $1.45-$1.60; the 24-hour 8.76% loss reflects selling pressure despite volume at $44.13M. RSI at 48.64 is in the neutral zone (low overbought/oversold risk), but Supertrend gives a bearish signal and the $1.27 resistance level is critical. There is a short-term bullish structure above EMA20 ($0.76), but the overall trend is sideways – this means high risk against sudden breakouts. Multi-timeframe (MTF) analysis identified 17 strong levels on 1D/3D/1W (1D: 3 support/4 resistance; 3D: 2S/2R; 1W: 5S/3R), which increases the risk of false breakouts (fakeouts) in an environment where levels are concentrated. Although the Bithumb listing (February 16) in the news flow is positive, the price reaction is negative; fundamental risks are fueling volatility. General uncertainty in the crypto market, especially combined with BTC downtrend, raises the danger of capital erosion for LIT. ATR-based volatility measurement shows that daily swings could exceed 10% – this makes it mandatory to set wider stop losses.

Risk/Reward Ratio Assessment

Potential Reward: Target Levels

Although the bullish target is not clearly defined, the short-term structure above EMA20 offers potential return to the $1.50-$1.60 resistance range (daily high); higher up, the $1.1507 resistance (72/100 score) could be tested. However, the sideways trend and bearish Supertrend indicate limited reward – aim for at least 1:2 risk/reward ratio; for example, even a 10% upside from $1.46 ($1.60) could be limited by BTC correlation. Long-term outlook is neutral; catalysts like the Bithumb listing could trigger, but current momentum is weak.

Potential Risk: Stop Levels

The risk side dominates: Although the bearish target points to -$0.7752, in practice main supports are $0.9103 (77/100), $1.1507 (72/100), and $1.0305 (71/100). On a breakdown below $1.46, the first invalidation is below $1.27 Supertrend resistance; if breached, a quick drop to $0.9103 (38% risk) is possible. Deeper supports are $0.6371 (71/100), $0.5210 (76/100), and $0.3868 (69/100) – these are strong on MTF but carry 60+% downside potential. If the sideways trend breaks downward, the reward/risk ratio could worsen to 1:3; always calculate the ratio with the nearest strong level.

Stop Loss Placement Strategies

Stop loss is the cornerstone of capital protection – for volatile altcoins like LIT, ATR-based (daily ATR ~10%) or structure-based placement is essential. Strategy 1: Dynamic stop with Supertrend (below $1.27) – use trailing stop on bearish signal, add 5-7% buffer ($1.36-$1.39) if price is at $1.46. Strategy 2: Below key level (e.g., $1.14 stop below $1.1507) with volatility buffer (2-3%) to avoid fakeouts. MTF integration: 1W support ($0.5210) as ultimate defense, but prioritize 1D resistances ($0.9103) for short-term entries. Educational note: Stops should never be mental; apply the 1% risk rule with automatic orders. In sideways trends, wide stops (ATR x 1.5) prevent liquidity hunts, while tight stops trigger early – optimize with backtesting. Track levels from Spot LIT and Futures LIT pages.

Position Sizing Considerations

Position sizing is the heart of risk management – we never recommend specific sizes, we teach concepts. Use Kelly Criterion or fixed % risk (1-2% account balance): For example, on a $10K account, $1.46 entry, $1.27 stop (13% distance), position = ($100 risk / $0.19 distance) = ~526 LIT. If volatility is high (ATR >8%), reduce size (down to 0.5%). Kelly formula: (Win% x Avg Win – Loss% x Avg Loss) / Avg Win – avoid aggressive sizing if win% is low in LIT sideways. Diversification: Total risk should not exceed 5%, allocate portfolio for correlated assets (with BTC). Long/short balance: Short bias in bearish tilt, but always take symmetric risk. These concepts keep drawdowns at 20% – apply with discipline.

Risk Management Summary

Key takeaways: Risk dominates in LIT – with sideways trend, bearish Supertrend, and BTC downtrend, capital protection is priority. Keep stops in $1.27-$1.15 range, do not trade below 1:2 R/R. Volatility creates fluctuations, limit positions to 1% risk. Bithumb news is positive but price action is weak; wait for breakout on MTF levels (17 strong points). Always do your own analysis, avoid emotional decisions.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at $66,353 in downtrend (24h -1.94%), Supertrend bearish – supports $65,406/$62,829/$60,000; resistances $68,027/$71,135. BTC decline pulls LIT down with 80+% correlation, especially if dominance rises, altcoin selling accelerates. If BTC breaks below $65K, LIT tests $1.27 stop; recovery above $68K could bring LIT short-covering. Watch: BTC $60K floor is vital for LIT, altcoin rally requires BTC stabilization.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Senior Technical Analyst: James Mitchell

6 years of crypto market analysis

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/lit-technical-analysis-february-18-2026-risk-and-stop-loss

Market Opportunity
Ucan fix life in1day Logo
Ucan fix life in1day Price(1)
$0.0006277
$0.0006277$0.0006277
-17.24%
USD
Ucan fix life in1day (1) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Secret Service’s ‘odd’ new suit policy raises eyebrows

Secret Service’s ‘odd’ new suit policy raises eyebrows

New Secret Service agents assigned to protective details are set to receive a taxpayer-funded wardrobe upgrade, according to a new CNN exclusive report.The Secret
Share
Rawstory2026/02/21 08:04
The Shift to Fractional Leadership: Agility in the 2026 Executive Suite

The Shift to Fractional Leadership: Agility in the 2026 Executive Suite

The traditional model of a permanent, full-time executive suite is undergoing a radical transformation. As we move through 2026, the concept of “Fractional Leadership
Share
Techbullion2026/02/21 08:20
OFAC Designates Two Iranian Finance Facilitators For Crypto Shadow Banking

OFAC Designates Two Iranian Finance Facilitators For Crypto Shadow Banking

The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned two Iranian financial facilitators for coordinating over $100 million worth of cryptocurrency in oil sales for the Iranian government, a September 16 press release shows. OFAC Sanctions Iranian Nationals According to the Tuesday press release, Iranian nationals Alireza Derakhshan and Arash Estaki Alivand “used a network of front companies in multiple foreign jurisdictions” to transfer the digital assets. OFAC alleges that Alivand and Derakhshan’s transfers also involved the sale of Iranian oil that benefited Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF) and the Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL). IRGC-QF and MODAFL then used the proceeds to support regional proxy terrorist organizations and strengthen their advanced weapons systems, including ballistic missiles. U.S. officials say the move targets shadow banking in the region, where illicit financial actors use overseas money laundering and digital assets to evade sanctions. “Iranian entities rely on shadow banking networks to evade sanctions and move millions through the international financial system,” said Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence John K. Hurley. “Under President Trump’s leadership, we will continue to disrupt these key financial streams that fund Iran’s weapons programs and malign activities in the Middle East and beyond,” he continued. Dozens Designated In Shadow Banking Scandal Both Alivand and Derakhshan have been designated “for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of the IRGC-QF.” In addition to Alivand and Derakhshan, OFAC has sanctioned more than a dozen Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates-based entities and individuals tied to the network. According to the press release, the sanctioned entities may face civil or criminal penalties imposed as a result
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 11:18