The post Michael Saylor’s Spinal Tap ad says STRC is like a bank account — it isn’t appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor used AI to appropriate aThe post Michael Saylor’s Spinal Tap ad says STRC is like a bank account — it isn’t appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor used AI to appropriate a

Michael Saylor’s Spinal Tap ad says STRC is like a bank account — it isn’t

Michael Saylor used AI to appropriate a famous scene from the mockumentary This Is Spinal Tap to advertise STRC as a competitor to insured savings products like bank accounts and money markets. 

STRC is a share of Saylor’s company Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) that pays non-guaranteed dividends at the sole discretion of the company’s board of directors. 

Unlike US bank accounts or money markets that enjoy FDIC, NCUA, or SIPC guarantees against loss, STRC offers no such assurances.

In fact, it’s fluctuated in value over the past 52 weeks from $90.52 to $100.42 — deviating substantially below its $100 par. In the past two weeks, for example, STRC has traded below $94.

In Saylor’s new promotion, a Nigel Tufnel lookalike explains to viewers that earning 0% dividends is “like a normal checking account,” or viewers could “turn it up to 3%” in a money market.

If they want “awesome” dividends, they could turn the dial to 10%, or they could choose STRC at 11%. 

Concluding with a call to action and a celebratory chorus, viewers are told they can “stretch your income.”

Saylor has repeated similar comparisons across various broadcast media, even though STRC isn’t any type of insured savings product. Indeed, the brazenness of this new Spinal Tap-themed ad isn’t an anomaly. 

Read more: Strategy manager wrong about BTC backing STRC

Months of likening STRC to bank accounts and money markets

“Everybody in the world would love to have a high yield bank account that yielded 10% or more,” Saylor broadcasted on national TV in reference to STRC last September.

“Or they’d love to have a money market that gave them double or triple their normal money market.”

Saylor has repeatedly likened STRC to insured savings products like FDIC-insured bank accounts or SIPC-insured money markets.

His company called STRC “Treasury credit,” even though the common understanding of US Treasury credit is literally risk-free savings bonds — redefining both terms using his ever-expanding dictionary of invented terminology.

The company went on to bury disclaimers about STRC’s “price stability” descriptions on page 90 of its latest earnings presentation where it finely admitted that STRC isn’t a money market fund.

It also admitted that although it plans to continue paying dividends and hopes to encourage traders to keep STRC near its par value, it’s actually “not required to hold any assets to back the STRC Stock.

Saylor has called STRC his company’s “greatest feat of financial engineering to date.” He once said that Strategy could sell $10 trillion worth of the shares and similar products denominated in foreign currencies.

“They want higher yield than a money market. We designed [STRC] for them,” Saylor said in October. “Who is [STRC] targeted at? There’s $18 trillion of bank accounts.”

Read more: The many weird AI depictions of Michael Saylor

More ‘high-yield savings account’ claims

On the public record, Saylor continued, “You can see the idea of this is a high-yield savings account that just pays twice your normal savings account if you understand and if you believe in bitcoin.

These quotes are not cherry-picked examples. There are ample, similar examples. 

“How many people want a money market that pays them 10% instead of 4%? A lot of people want that. So, we just kind of created something that looks like a money market instrument,” Saylor said at another conference.

In another egregious example, Saylor likened STRC to an FDIC-insured bank account after he calculated the tax-advantaged yield equivalents of STRC’s dividend by state of residence.

We created a bank account that pays 17-20% by combining digital capital with a digital credit instrument with a digital treasury company that issues securities to pay the dividend,” he declared.

From a stage in Dubai, Saylor said, “When designing STRC, our goal was to create a high-yield bank account-style product.” 

He has repeated that claim. “Our goal is to provide you with a bank account that pays you 10% instead of your bank that pays you 4 or 3 or 2 or 0. That’s what STRC is.”

Not a bank account or money market

To be clear, despite Saylor’s promotional statements, STRC is nothing like a bank account or money market. 

Indeed, it has no insurance from FDIC, NCUA, SIPC, or otherwise to guarantee its par value.

Strategy isn’t required to hold full assets to back STRC’s par value, isn’t required to maintain any particular pricing or stable value, and isn’t subject to the liquidity requirements of real money market funds. 

STRC can and has lost value of its investors’ principal during periods of volatility, trading over 9% below its par value in the past.

Investors don’t have a direct redemption right with Strategy at par value, so they must hope for secondary market traders to bid for shares near par value.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/michael-saylors-spinal-tap-ad-says-strc-is-like-a-bank-account-it-isnt/

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.04219
$0.04219$0.04219
-0.02%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Will Bitcoin Soar or Stumble Next?

Will Bitcoin Soar or Stumble Next?

The post Will Bitcoin Soar or Stumble Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. With the Federal Reserve’s forthcoming decision on interest rates causing speculation, Bitcoin‘s value remains stable at $115,400. China’s surprising maneuvers in the financial landscape have shifted expected market trends, prompting deeper examination by investors into analysts’ past evaluations regarding rate reductions. Continue Reading:Will Bitcoin Soar or Stumble Next? Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/will-bitcoin-soar-or-stumble-next
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:09
House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

The post House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline House Judiciary Committee Republicans blocked a Democrat effort Wednesday to subpoena a group of major banks as part of a renewed investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s financial ties. Congressman Jim Jordan, R-OH, is the chairman of the committee. (Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images) Anadolu via Getty Images Key Facts A near party-line vote squashed the effort to vote on a subpoena, with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who is leading a separate effort to force the Justice Department to release more Epstein case materials, voting alongside Democrats. The vote, if successful, would have resulted in the issuing of subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, Deutsche Bank CEO Christian Sewing and Bank of New York Mellon CEO Robin Vince. The subpoenas would have specifically looked into multiple reports that claimed the four banks flagged $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions linked to Epstein. The failed effort from Democrats followed an FBI oversight hearing in which agency director Kash Patel misleadingly claimed the FBI cannot release many of the files it has on Epstein. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Crucial Quote Dimon, who attended a lunch with Senate Republicans before the vote, according to Politico, told reporters, “We regret any association with that man at all. And, of course, if it’s a legal requirement, we would conform to it. We have no issue with that.” Chief Critic “Republicans had the chance to subpoena the CEOs of JPMorgan, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of New York Mellon to expose Epstein’s money trail,” the House Judiciary Democrats said in a tweet. “Instead, they tried to bury…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:02
Zero-Trust Databases: Redefining the Future of Data Security

Zero-Trust Databases: Redefining the Future of Data Security

Sayantan Saha is a researcher in advanced computing and data protection. He explores how zero-trust databases are reshaping the landscape of information security.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/18 14:19