The post Black Ops 7’ Is Making One Major Change After Gamer Backlash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Black Ops 7 Credit: Activision Back when Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare II was drawing down and Modern Warfare III was on the horizon, the Call Of Duty community was up in arms. The new game, they believed, was little more than a glorified and overpriced DLC. To help mollify the community, Activision announced that all the guns and Operator skins from MWII would carry over to MWIII. If anything, this made the sequel feel even more like an expansion. Now, I disagree that MWIII was just a glorified DLC for MWII. It was a very different game in a lot of ways, with a much better movement system and a ton of new (and remade) maps. It felt a lot better to play. But it was weird to have two Modern Warfare games release back-to-back, and I understand why the community was a little miffed, especially since the campaign was pretty lackluster and felt like it had been rushed. Now we find ourselves in a similar situation, with Black Ops 7 releasing the year after Black Ops 6. The latter introduced tons of new stuff including the fun (if controversial) Omnimovement mechanics, which I’ve come to really enjoy. But the Black Ops 7 reveal left a lot of gamers really upset. Partly, it’s the contrast to Battlefield 6. That game feels like a proper military sim, while Black Ops 7 seems to be taking the franchise in an absurdist direction, not just futuristic but completely off-the-wall. The reveal trailer was overwhelmingly disliked by gamers, with many commenting that the trailer alone made them pre-order Battlefield 6 out of spite. One big issue? The direction Activision has gone with Operator skins over the past few games. Call Of Duty has had goofy skins for a long time, but these were… The post Black Ops 7’ Is Making One Major Change After Gamer Backlash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Black Ops 7 Credit: Activision Back when Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare II was drawing down and Modern Warfare III was on the horizon, the Call Of Duty community was up in arms. The new game, they believed, was little more than a glorified and overpriced DLC. To help mollify the community, Activision announced that all the guns and Operator skins from MWII would carry over to MWIII. If anything, this made the sequel feel even more like an expansion. Now, I disagree that MWIII was just a glorified DLC for MWII. It was a very different game in a lot of ways, with a much better movement system and a ton of new (and remade) maps. It felt a lot better to play. But it was weird to have two Modern Warfare games release back-to-back, and I understand why the community was a little miffed, especially since the campaign was pretty lackluster and felt like it had been rushed. Now we find ourselves in a similar situation, with Black Ops 7 releasing the year after Black Ops 6. The latter introduced tons of new stuff including the fun (if controversial) Omnimovement mechanics, which I’ve come to really enjoy. But the Black Ops 7 reveal left a lot of gamers really upset. Partly, it’s the contrast to Battlefield 6. That game feels like a proper military sim, while Black Ops 7 seems to be taking the franchise in an absurdist direction, not just futuristic but completely off-the-wall. The reveal trailer was overwhelmingly disliked by gamers, with many commenting that the trailer alone made them pre-order Battlefield 6 out of spite. One big issue? The direction Activision has gone with Operator skins over the past few games. Call Of Duty has had goofy skins for a long time, but these were…

Black Ops 7’ Is Making One Major Change After Gamer Backlash

Black Ops 7

Credit: Activision

Back when Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare II was drawing down and Modern Warfare III was on the horizon, the Call Of Duty community was up in arms. The new game, they believed, was little more than a glorified and overpriced DLC. To help mollify the community, Activision announced that all the guns and Operator skins from MWII would carry over to MWIII. If anything, this made the sequel feel even more like an expansion.

Now, I disagree that MWIII was just a glorified DLC for MWII. It was a very different game in a lot of ways, with a much better movement system and a ton of new (and remade) maps. It felt a lot better to play. But it was weird to have two Modern Warfare games release back-to-back, and I understand why the community was a little miffed, especially since the campaign was pretty lackluster and felt like it had been rushed.

Now we find ourselves in a similar situation, with Black Ops 7 releasing the year after Black Ops 6. The latter introduced tons of new stuff including the fun (if controversial) Omnimovement mechanics, which I’ve come to really enjoy. But the Black Ops 7 reveal left a lot of gamers really upset. Partly, it’s the contrast to Battlefield 6. That game feels like a proper military sim, while Black Ops 7 seems to be taking the franchise in an absurdist direction, not just futuristic but completely off-the-wall.

The reveal trailer was overwhelmingly disliked by gamers, with many commenting that the trailer alone made them pre-order Battlefield 6 out of spite. One big issue? The direction Activision has gone with Operator skins over the past few games. Call Of Duty has had goofy skins for a long time, but these were historically pretty rare. A Snoop Dogg skin here, a Grim Reaper skin there, maybe some kind of horror movie killer or Santa. Now, comparisons to Fortnite are commonplace and well-earned.

When Treyarch revealed that Operator skins and guns/blueprints would Carry Over to Black Ops 7, you could almost hear the audible groan of the community (or maybe that was just me). It’s nice to just start over with more grounded Operators and everyone leveling the same guns each year, and now we’d have to deal with Beavis and Butthead with the launch of Season 1, and fully leveled-up guns with laser and dismemberment effects.

When I spoke with Treyarch, I asked them if they were considering anything to appeal to gamers who preferred to play the game as more of a mil-sim. Perhaps a toggle, I suggested, similar to how you can toggle off dismemberment effects and animations. They said they were listening to community feedback, but were otherwise noncommittal. These Operator skin bundles are hugely profitable, so it makes sense that Activision and Microsoft would not want to give players the option to turn them off.

Then again, from a zoomed out perspective, maybe it would make sense to throw your community a bone. Today, Activision announced that they were, in fact, throwing at least a small bone to Call Of Duty players. They’ve reversed the decision to Carry Over skins and guns from Black Ops 6 to Black Ops 7, though these will still be available in the free-to-play Warzone battle royale.

“We know there’s been a lot of conversation recently about the identity of Call of Duty,” Activision posted in a community update Tuesday. “Some of you have said we’ve drifted from what made Call of Duty unique in the first place: immersive, intense, visceral and in many ways grounded. That feedback hits home, and we take it seriously. We hear you.

Operators, Operator Skins, and Weapons from Black Ops 6 will no longer carry forward into Black Ops 7.

“Black Ops 7 needs to feel authentic to Call of Duty and its setting. That is why Black Ops 6 Operator and Weapon content will not carry forward to Black Ops 7.”

Activision notes that XP tokens and Gobblegums (consumables, basically) will carry over to Black Ops 7, which is good. In fact, I’d say this entire update is a very good thing all around. In fact, the post also notes that this isn’t stopping with Carry Over.

“In Black Ops 7, bundles and items will be crafted to fit the Black Ops identity,” the post continues. “We hear the feedback. We need to deliver a better balance toward the immersive, core Call of Duty experience.”

This is great news if Activision sticks to it and really does avoid the ridiculous direction these games have gone over the past few years. I think the occasional fun or zany bundle is fine, but when Beavis and Butthead and green dragon people are everywhere, it starts to get pretty stupid. A toggle on/off option would also be a good idea, though I’m not sure how feasible that is from the developer’s end.

This is certainly Activision listening to consumer feedback, but it’s also pressure from the competition. Battlefield 6 is opting for a more realistic approach, and the popularity of that decision has had ripple effects. This is why it’s so important to have competition from other big FPS games. I guess we’ll see what exactly the “Black Ops identity” is over the next year.

Black Ops 7 launches on November 14th. There will be an open beta in early October. Read more about the upcoming first-person shooter right here.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2025/08/26/call-of-duty-black-ops-7-is-making-one-major-change-after-gamer-backlash/

Market Opportunity
Sport.Fun Logo
Sport.Fun Price(FUN)
$0
$0$0
0.00%
USD
Sport.Fun (FUN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures

CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures

The post CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. CME Group will offer options based on the derivative markets on Solana (SOL) and XRP. The new markets will open on October 13, after regulatory approval.  CME Group will expand its crypto products with options on the futures markets of Solana (SOL) and XRP. The futures market will start on October 13, after regulatory review and approval.  The options will allow the trading of MicroSol, XRP, and MicroXRP futures, with expiry dates available every business day, monthly, and quarterly. The new products will be added to the existing BTC and ETH options markets. ‘The launch of these options contracts builds on the significant growth and increasing liquidity we have seen across our suite of Solana and XRP futures,’ said Giovanni Vicioso, CME Group Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products. The options contracts will have two main sizes, tracking the futures contracts. The new market will be suitable for sophisticated institutional traders, as well as active individual traders. The addition of options markets singles out XRP and SOL as liquid enough to offer the potential to bet on a market direction.  The options on futures arrive a few months after the launch of SOL futures. Both SOL and XRP had peak volumes in August, though XRP activity has slowed down in September. XRP and SOL options to tap both institutions and active traders Crypto options are one of the indicators of market attitudes, with XRP and SOL receiving a new way to gauge sentiment. The contracts will be supported by the Cumberland team.  ‘As one of the biggest liquidity providers in the ecosystem, the Cumberland team is excited to support CME Group’s continued expansion of crypto offerings,’ said Roman Makarov, Head of Cumberland Options Trading at DRW. ‘The launch of options on Solana and XRP futures is the latest example of the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:56
XLM Price Prediction: Stellar Targets $0.26-$0.27 Range by February 2026

XLM Price Prediction: Stellar Targets $0.26-$0.27 Range by February 2026

The post XLM Price Prediction: Stellar Targets $0.26-$0.27 Range by February 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Zach Anderson Jan 14, 2026 13:31 XLM
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/15 10:06
Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token

Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token

The post Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Largest Bank in Spain Launches Crypto Service: Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token Sign Up for Our Newsletter! For updates and exclusive offers enter your email. Leah is a British journalist with a BA in Journalism, Media, and Communications and nearly a decade of content writing experience. Over the last four years, her focus has primarily been on Web3 technologies, driven by her genuine enthusiasm for decentralization and the latest technological advancements. She has contributed to leading crypto and NFT publications – Cointelegraph, Coinbound, Crypto News, NFT Plazas, Bitcolumnist, Techreport, and NFT Lately – which has elevated her to a senior role in crypto journalism. Whether crafting breaking news or in-depth reviews, she strives to engage her readers with the latest insights and information. Her articles often span the hottest cryptos, exchanges, and evolving regulations. As part of her ploy to attract crypto newbies into Web3, she explains even the most complex topics in an easily understandable and engaging way. Further underscoring her dynamic journalism background, she has written for various sectors, including software testing (TEST Magazine), travel (Travel Off Path), and music (Mixmag). When she’s not deep into a crypto rabbit hole, she’s probably island-hopping (with the Galapagos and Hainan being her go-to’s). Or perhaps sketching chalk pencil drawings while listening to the Pixies, her all-time favorite band. This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy Center or Cookie Policy. I Agree Source: https://bitcoinist.com/banco-santander-and-snorter-token-crypto-services/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:45