Analytics have always been a lifeline for ecommerce merchants, providing them the information they need to make decisions and keep operations rolling. For a whileAnalytics have always been a lifeline for ecommerce merchants, providing them the information they need to make decisions and keep operations rolling. For a while

Rethinking Analytics for Real-world Decision Making

2026/02/20 06:55
6 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Analytics have always been a lifeline for ecommerce merchants, providing them the information they need to make decisions and keep operations rolling. For a while, dashboard-based analysis worked, but as data increased, operations became more sophisticated, and decision cycles shortened, the cracks in dashboard-based analytics began to show.

Setting aside the issue of data silos covered elsewhere, dashboard-based analytics failed in three core ways:

1. Many analyses required pulling multiple datasets, requiring analytics workers to pull multiple CSVs and stitch together the data outside of the data.
2. Setting the right business context for the report often required customizations to the dashboards, like setting filters, or adding additional dimensions or metrics.
3. After the data has been collected and reports adjusted, dashboards merely present the data, but it’s up to the user to sift through and mine for insights. At best, this was a slow process. At worst, it left some insights uncovered.

As a result of these issues, traditional dashboard-based analytics forced business users to spend hours trying to make data-driven decisions, or hire data teams to implement new reports, often lagging as new dashboards and data features were developed to answer the questions of the business user. Neither approach scaled well, especially when decisions need to happen quickly.

The Promise of AI

With the advent of new AI capabilities, ecommerce merchants and SaaS providers in the ecommerce space rushed to see how AI could solve the pain points of a dashboard-based analytics approach.

Many merchants download a raw dataset from a dashboard in their ecommerce platform and upload it to AI-based interfaces like ChatGPT. When you compare this to the old spreadsheet style approach, users can extract insights in minutes instead of hours.

But could AI solve the other two issues raised above? What if the right dataset isn’t available in the standard dashboards? Could AI assist in pulling this together? And if so, could AI ensure the right business context to ensure the accuracy of the data and resulting analysis?

There was quite a bit of interest for AI copilots early on, as organizations started putting them on top of their existing data and hoped for the best. Unfortunately, as these AI solutions went into play, the results were often disappointing because the model was missing context. Trust was also difficult to establish, since many systems would return answers while methodology went missing or was difficult to interpret. Without visibility into how conclusions were reached, responses were viewed hesitantly even when technically correct.

Building a modern analyst: how natural-language AI changes how teams work with data

At the end of the day, the ideal state for a business user is to ask a question in natural language, and be presented back with a complete solution including methodology, engendering trust and confidence in the results.

A quality analyst was already solving this need, albeit with a lag time. What were the traits that make the analyst effective?

1. Effective analysts know the specifics on how the business operates. They are able to translate the question from the business user to specific data features and scope the data appropriately. The analyst also knows how key metrics are defined for the business, and can adjust reporting to accommodate these definitions.
2. The analyst has unfettered access to the data, and could write SQL to pull ad hoc datasets when needed, not requiring another BI report buildout.
3. A quality analyst would present assumptions and methodology as part of the response to the business user, creating a shared understanding of the solution and providing a foundation for further refinement of the analysis.

To break the paradigm of dashboard based reporting, AI needs to be equipped with these same abilities, but at machine speed versus human speed.

​​Reasoning directly against governed internal data

An AI-based analytics approach can start at the same natural language question jumping off point, but rather than relying on shared or abstracted reporting layers in a BI tool with its slow implementation cycles, brands need an architecture that allows AI to reason directly against governed data.

Cloud software providers such as Google, Snowflake or Databricks have made it easier to deploy text-to-sql capabilities translating natural language text to SQL and effectively datasets for human use. This jailbreaks the data from the constraints of a traditional BI tool, requiring developers to model data before it can be accessed. But even with these off the shelf tools, additional care is required to allow AI to accurately and efficiently pull data.

To inform the models how to get to the right data, two additional pieces need come into play:

A modeled semantic view describing the data structures available and their potential applications, allowing the LLM to understand not just what dimensions/metrics are available but how they can be translated to business terms or leveraged in different questions
Merchant-specific context providing knowledge of the key business concepts (e.g. I run a small wholesale business in conjunction with my e-commerce site, but want to restrict reporting to e-commerce) to avoid prompt repetition (providing this info over and over again in the conversational interface)

Armed with this information, AI can begin to operate like an analyst, with knowledge of the business to apply key constraints, access to the full dataset through SQL without requiring additional report buildout, and the inherent capabilities of the LLM to reason on top of this data.

The last essential part to replicating an analyst is how AI interfaces with the business user. Instructing the underlying agent to mimic the presentation skills of analysts is a start, but there is also an opportunity to fine craft the user interface to allow the solution to unfold assumptions and methodology as desired by the user.

The goal of conversational AI interfaces is to reduce translation rather than hide complexity. Teams will ultimately be more confident in the results they receive when AI models are able to easily show their logic and approach, allowing business users to interact on their own terms.

Looking ahead: Implications of conversational AI for analytics

When paired with strong governance and business context, conversational AI is on the cusp of supplanting traditional dashboard-based analytics as the primary means for a business user to make data-driven decisions.

Analysis becomes more fluid with teams able to test assumptions without waiting for report updates or custom builds, and unplanned questions no longer disrupt existing workflows.

Roles sharpen as analysts spend less time responding to ad hoc requests and more time focusing on governance and accuracy, while business users gain more autonomy while remaining within approved boundaries. Collaboration improves because both groups operate from a common base.

And ultimately, data is more accessible to help guide decisions across the entire business.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why is the Crypto Market Rising Today? Top Factors Impacting BTC, ETH & XRP Prices

Why is the Crypto Market Rising Today? Top Factors Impacting BTC, ETH & XRP Prices

The post Why is the Crypto Market Rising Today? Top Factors Impacting BTC, ETH & XRP Prices  appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Selling pressure across the
Share
CoinPedia2026/03/05 13:30
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00
Xhavic Showcases Layer-2 Vision at Dubai Web3 Event

Xhavic Showcases Layer-2 Vision at Dubai Web3 Event

Xhavic Blockchain positioned itself at the center of global Web3 discussions during a major pre-launch event held in Dubai. The gathering also featured the soft
Share
CoinTrust2026/03/05 13:33