Rising physical threats highlight the urgent need for better security measures in crypto asset management.
Key takeaways
- Self-custody in crypto is crucial to avoid reliance on third parties, which pose significant risks.
- Privacy acts as the first line of defense in crypto security, preventing further attacks.
- Physical attacks on crypto holders are increasing, highlighting the need for enhanced security measures.
- Trusted third parties remain the primary threat to crypto holders, overshadowing smart contract risks.
- Economic pressures on crypto companies may reduce the frequency of smart contract audits, increasing investor risk.
- Phishing attacks are the most common threat to individuals managing their own crypto assets.
- Digital security must be prioritized to counteract the high probability of phishing attacks.
- Scammers impersonate reputable brands to trick users into granting permissions, leading to asset theft.
- Physical threats, including home invasions, are a significant risk for crypto holders.
- Malware targeting devices that secure private keys poses a major threat to wallet security.
- Social engineering is a common tactic in phishing attacks, emphasizing the need for user awareness.
- A three-wallet system is recommended for managing risk in crypto transactions.
Guest intro
Jameson Lopp is Co-Founder and CTO of Casa, a Bitcoin security company specializing in key management solutions. He previously worked at BitGo, where he enhanced multisignature security services that now secure 20% of all Bitcoin transactions. Lopp also created Statoshi, a platform monitoring the Bitcoin network for attacks.
The threat of third-party reliance in crypto
- “The biggest threat to crypto natives is reliance on trusted third parties and not taking custody of their own assets.” – Jameson Lopp
- Self-custody is emphasized as a critical security measure to mitigate risks.
- “Privacy is the outermost layer of security in the crypto space.” – Jameson Lopp
- Physical attacks on crypto holders are gaining attention, highlighting a new security concern.
- “The primary threat to crypto holders comes from trusted third parties rather than novel smart contracts or branch attacks.” – Jameson Lopp
- Economic pressures may lead to fewer smart contract audits, increasing risks for investors.
- Phishing attacks are the most probable threat for individuals managing their own crypto assets.
- Digital security should be prioritized to protect against common threats in crypto.
The rise of physical and digital threats
- “Scammers often impersonate reputable brands to trick users into granting permissions that allow them to steal assets.” – Jameson Lopp
- The most dangerous course of action involves potential physical threats to individuals and their families.
- Attackers often use malware to compromise devices that secure private keys, leading to potential wallet theft.
- “Almost all phishing attempts involve elements of social engineering.” – Jameson Lopp
- Combating digital threats in crypto requires simplicity and minimizing attack surfaces.
- Users should segregate their crypto wallets based on the amount of funds and risk involved.
- Avoiding on-chain activities entirely may not be the best solution to mitigate risks.
Managing crypto security through wallet strategies
- “A three-wallet system can help manage risk in crypto transactions.” – Jameson Lopp
- Simply owning an ETF instead of participating in crypto activities defeats the purpose of owning digital assets.
- Properly managing private keys and seed phrases can significantly reduce the risk of losing crypto assets.
- Users should avoid keeping all their crypto assets in one wallet to mitigate risks.
- A good wallet segmentation approach involves using a hot wallet for small amounts and a cold wallet for larger holdings.
- Social engineering is the most common form of attack against crypto holders today.
The importance of self-custody and security measures
- “Individuals must recognize the responsibility that comes with taking custody of their crypto assets.” – Jameson Lopp
- Operating a crypto wallet requires peak cognitive condition to avoid costly mistakes.
- Transactions involving on-chain assets should never be rushed, especially under emotional stress.
- Most communication channels lack authentication, making them vulnerable to impersonation.
- “I don’t trust any incoming message that seems fishy.” – Jameson Lopp
- Using shared insider knowledge for authentication is more reliable than random words.
Enhancing security with physical and digital measures
- “It’s safer to log in directly to websites rather than clicking on links in messages.” – Jameson Lopp
- Password managers protect users from various types of phishing attacks by ensuring credentials are only autofilled on legitimate websites.
- Investing in a hardware security key like a YubiKey is a wise decision for anyone involved in crypto.
- SMS for two-factor authentication is highly insecure and should not be used.
- Yubikeys provide superior security for two-factor authentication by storing secrets on the hardware device itself.
- Email accounts are the most critical aspect of most people’s digital lives.
Addressing privacy vulnerabilities in the digital age
- “Investing in security measures like passkeys and YubiKeys will become essential for everyone in the future.” – Jameson Lopp
- The goal of security is to have better defenses than potential attackers.
- Using a separate machine for signing crypto transactions is a foolproof method to enhance security.
- The number of violent in-person attacks targeting individuals with digital assets is increasing.
- Attackers are identifying potential targets by monitoring their digital presence and wealth indicators.
- The digital age has created significant privacy vulnerabilities for individuals.
Organized crime and cross-border threats
- “Attacks on crypto figures often involve kidnapping for ransom.” – Jameson Lopp
- Dubai has the highest rate of rich attacks due to high-value face-to-face OTC trades.
- Corruption within tax authorities can lead to the exposure of individuals with crypto assets to organized crime.
- Organized crime often involves a remote mastermind who coordinates with local criminals.
- Organized crime is leveraging cross-border jurisdictional arbitrage to conduct attacks on crypto holders.
- Attackers can easily pinpoint a victim’s physical address through various data leaks.
Preventing physical and digital security breaches
- “Preventing oneself from becoming a target is crucial in mitigating risks associated with physical home invasion attacks.” – Jameson Lopp
- Rich attacks can occur even when assets are held with custodians, not just in self-custody.
- Ransom attackers have a greater than 50% success rate and are able to steal tens of millions of dollars annually.
- To prevent a wrench attack, one must eliminate themselves as a single point of failure in their security setup.
- A distributed key system enhances security by using multiple hardware devices from different manufacturers.
- Public permissionless networks can achieve security models that surpass traditional institutions like banks or Fort Knox.
The role of multisig and decentralized security
- “Using air-gapped devices like ledgers and treasures is crucial for protecting crypto keys from online attacks.” – Jameson Lopp
- The biggest risks in self-custody are not from hackers but from mistakes and environmental failures.
- Multisig setups provide flexibility and redundancy in key management, reducing the risk of catastrophic failure.
- Decisions about key distribution in crypto involve trade-offs between convenience and security.
- Distributing keys across various locations enhances security but can be inconvenient.
- Physical safeguards and multi-signature setups are crucial in preventing successful wrench attacks.
The future of self-custody and financial sovereignty
- “Vitalik Buterin’s multisig setup incorporates a social recovery mechanism to enhance security.” – Jameson Lopp
- If the success rate of attacks drops significantly, attackers will find it less profitable to conduct home invasions.
- Becoming a hard target is crucial for personal security.
- Reinforcing home security can significantly delay unauthorized entry.
- Most American home construction uses inadequate materials for security.
- Home defense requires a strategic approach to weapon accessibility and safety.
Enhancing privacy and security in crypto transactions
- “To enhance on-chain privacy, it’s important to use new wallets funded from different exchanges than those used for previous wallets.” – Jameson Lopp
- Using mixers for privacy can lead to compliance risks and unwanted associations.
- For strong privacy, it’s better to use crypto designed with privacy features at the protocol level.
- Privacy in the crypto industry is currently inadequate and poses significant risks.
- Using exchange API keys in tax software can lead to security vulnerabilities.
- The responsibility of managing private keys can feel overwhelming and may deter some from self-custody.
Balancing convenience and security in self-custody
- “Self-custodial crypto may still be the end game despite current setbacks.” – Jameson Lopp
- Self-custody in crypto empowers individuals by allowing them to take control of their finances without relying on external authorities.
- Human nature tends to favor convenience, which complicates the adoption of self-custody in finance.
- Self-custody in crypto must be made more convenient to prevent users from outsourcing their control to third parties.
- Empowering individuals through public permissionless protocols is essential for achieving financial sovereignty.
Rising physical threats highlight the urgent need for better security measures in crypto asset management.
Key takeaways
- Self-custody in crypto is crucial to avoid reliance on third parties, which pose significant risks.
- Privacy acts as the first line of defense in crypto security, preventing further attacks.
- Physical attacks on crypto holders are increasing, highlighting the need for enhanced security measures.
- Trusted third parties remain the primary threat to crypto holders, overshadowing smart contract risks.
- Economic pressures on crypto companies may reduce the frequency of smart contract audits, increasing investor risk.
- Phishing attacks are the most common threat to individuals managing their own crypto assets.
- Digital security must be prioritized to counteract the high probability of phishing attacks.
- Scammers impersonate reputable brands to trick users into granting permissions, leading to asset theft.
- Physical threats, including home invasions, are a significant risk for crypto holders.
- Malware targeting devices that secure private keys poses a major threat to wallet security.
- Social engineering is a common tactic in phishing attacks, emphasizing the need for user awareness.
- A three-wallet system is recommended for managing risk in crypto transactions.
Guest intro
Jameson Lopp is Co-Founder and CTO of Casa, a Bitcoin security company specializing in key management solutions. He previously worked at BitGo, where he enhanced multisignature security services that now secure 20% of all Bitcoin transactions. Lopp also created Statoshi, a platform monitoring the Bitcoin network for attacks.
The threat of third-party reliance in crypto
- “The biggest threat to crypto natives is reliance on trusted third parties and not taking custody of their own assets.” – Jameson Lopp
- Self-custody is emphasized as a critical security measure to mitigate risks.
- “Privacy is the outermost layer of security in the crypto space.” – Jameson Lopp
- Physical attacks on crypto holders are gaining attention, highlighting a new security concern.
- “The primary threat to crypto holders comes from trusted third parties rather than novel smart contracts or branch attacks.” – Jameson Lopp
- Economic pressures may lead to fewer smart contract audits, increasing risks for investors.
- Phishing attacks are the most probable threat for individuals managing their own crypto assets.
- Digital security should be prioritized to protect against common threats in crypto.
The rise of physical and digital threats
- “Scammers often impersonate reputable brands to trick users into granting permissions that allow them to steal assets.” – Jameson Lopp
- The most dangerous course of action involves potential physical threats to individuals and their families.
- Attackers often use malware to compromise devices that secure private keys, leading to potential wallet theft.
- “Almost all phishing attempts involve elements of social engineering.” – Jameson Lopp
- Combating digital threats in crypto requires simplicity and minimizing attack surfaces.
- Users should segregate their crypto wallets based on the amount of funds and risk involved.
- Avoiding on-chain activities entirely may not be the best solution to mitigate risks.
Managing crypto security through wallet strategies
- “A three-wallet system can help manage risk in crypto transactions.” – Jameson Lopp
- Simply owning an ETF instead of participating in crypto activities defeats the purpose of owning digital assets.
- Properly managing private keys and seed phrases can significantly reduce the risk of losing crypto assets.
- Users should avoid keeping all their crypto assets in one wallet to mitigate risks.
- A good wallet segmentation approach involves using a hot wallet for small amounts and a cold wallet for larger holdings.
- Social engineering is the most common form of attack against crypto holders today.
The importance of self-custody and security measures
- “Individuals must recognize the responsibility that comes with taking custody of their crypto assets.” – Jameson Lopp
- Operating a crypto wallet requires peak cognitive condition to avoid costly mistakes.
- Transactions involving on-chain assets should never be rushed, especially under emotional stress.
- Most communication channels lack authentication, making them vulnerable to impersonation.
- “I don’t trust any incoming message that seems fishy.” – Jameson Lopp
- Using shared insider knowledge for authentication is more reliable than random words.
Enhancing security with physical and digital measures
- “It’s safer to log in directly to websites rather than clicking on links in messages.” – Jameson Lopp
- Password managers protect users from various types of phishing attacks by ensuring credentials are only autofilled on legitimate websites.
- Investing in a hardware security key like a YubiKey is a wise decision for anyone involved in crypto.
- SMS for two-factor authentication is highly insecure and should not be used.
- Yubikeys provide superior security for two-factor authentication by storing secrets on the hardware device itself.
- Email accounts are the most critical aspect of most people’s digital lives.
Addressing privacy vulnerabilities in the digital age
- “Investing in security measures like passkeys and YubiKeys will become essential for everyone in the future.” – Jameson Lopp
- The goal of security is to have better defenses than potential attackers.
- Using a separate machine for signing crypto transactions is a foolproof method to enhance security.
- The number of violent in-person attacks targeting individuals with digital assets is increasing.
- Attackers are identifying potential targets by monitoring their digital presence and wealth indicators.
- The digital age has created significant privacy vulnerabilities for individuals.
Organized crime and cross-border threats
- “Attacks on crypto figures often involve kidnapping for ransom.” – Jameson Lopp
- Dubai has the highest rate of rich attacks due to high-value face-to-face OTC trades.
- Corruption within tax authorities can lead to the exposure of individuals with crypto assets to organized crime.
- Organized crime often involves a remote mastermind who coordinates with local criminals.
- Organized crime is leveraging cross-border jurisdictional arbitrage to conduct attacks on crypto holders.
- Attackers can easily pinpoint a victim’s physical address through various data leaks.
Preventing physical and digital security breaches
- “Preventing oneself from becoming a target is crucial in mitigating risks associated with physical home invasion attacks.” – Jameson Lopp
- Rich attacks can occur even when assets are held with custodians, not just in self-custody.
- Ransom attackers have a greater than 50% success rate and are able to steal tens of millions of dollars annually.
- To prevent a wrench attack, one must eliminate themselves as a single point of failure in their security setup.
- A distributed key system enhances security by using multiple hardware devices from different manufacturers.
- Public permissionless networks can achieve security models that surpass traditional institutions like banks or Fort Knox.
The role of multisig and decentralized security
- “Using air-gapped devices like ledgers and treasures is crucial for protecting crypto keys from online attacks.” – Jameson Lopp
- The biggest risks in self-custody are not from hackers but from mistakes and environmental failures.
- Multisig setups provide flexibility and redundancy in key management, reducing the risk of catastrophic failure.
- Decisions about key distribution in crypto involve trade-offs between convenience and security.
- Distributing keys across various locations enhances security but can be inconvenient.
- Physical safeguards and multi-signature setups are crucial in preventing successful wrench attacks.
The future of self-custody and financial sovereignty
- “Vitalik Buterin’s multisig setup incorporates a social recovery mechanism to enhance security.” – Jameson Lopp
- If the success rate of attacks drops significantly, attackers will find it less profitable to conduct home invasions.
- Becoming a hard target is crucial for personal security.
- Reinforcing home security can significantly delay unauthorized entry.
- Most American home construction uses inadequate materials for security.
- Home defense requires a strategic approach to weapon accessibility and safety.
Enhancing privacy and security in crypto transactions
- “To enhance on-chain privacy, it’s important to use new wallets funded from different exchanges than those used for previous wallets.” – Jameson Lopp
- Using mixers for privacy can lead to compliance risks and unwanted associations.
- For strong privacy, it’s better to use crypto designed with privacy features at the protocol level.
- Privacy in the crypto industry is currently inadequate and poses significant risks.
- Using exchange API keys in tax software can lead to security vulnerabilities.
- The responsibility of managing private keys can feel overwhelming and may deter some from self-custody.
Balancing convenience and security in self-custody
- “Self-custodial crypto may still be the end game despite current setbacks.” – Jameson Lopp
- Self-custody in crypto empowers individuals by allowing them to take control of their finances without relying on external authorities.
- Human nature tends to favor convenience, which complicates the adoption of self-custody in finance.
- Self-custody in crypto must be made more convenient to prevent users from outsourcing their control to third parties.
- Empowering individuals through public permissionless protocols is essential for achieving financial sovereignty.
Loading more articles…
You’ve reached the end
Add us on Google
`;
}
function createMobileArticle(article) {
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `
${article.imageCaption}
` : ”;
const authorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;
return `
${captionHtml}
${article.subheadline ? `
${article.subheadline}
` : ”}
${createSocialShare()}
${authorHtml}
${displayDate}
${article.content}
`;
}
function createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml) {
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `
${article.imageCaption}
` : ”;
const categoriesHtml = article.categories.map((cat, i) => {
const separator = i < article.categories.length – 1 ? ‘|‘ : ”;
return `${cat}${separator}`;
}).join(”);
const desktopAuthorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;
return `
${categoriesHtml}
${article.subheadline}
` : ”}
${desktopAuthorHtml}
${displayDate}
${createSocialShare()}
${captionHtml}
`;
}
function loadMoreArticles() {
if (isLoading || !hasMore) return;
isLoading = true;
loadingText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
// Build form data for AJAX request
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append(‘action’, ‘cb_lovable_load_more’);
formData.append(‘current_post_id’, lastLoadedPostId);
formData.append(‘primary_cat_id’, primaryCatId);
formData.append(‘before_date’, lastLoadedDate);
formData.append(‘loaded_ids’, loadedPostIds.join(‘,’));
fetch(ajaxUrl, {
method: ‘POST’,
body: formData
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);
if (data.success && data.has_more && data.article) {
const article = data.article;
const sidebarAdHtml = data.sidebar_ad_html || ”;
// Check for duplicates
if (loadedPostIds.includes(article.id)) {
console.log(‘Duplicate article detected, skipping:’, article.id);
// Update pagination vars and try again
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;
loadMoreArticles();
return;
}
// Add to mobile container
mobileContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createMobileArticle(article));
// Add to desktop container with fresh ad HTML
desktopContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml));
// Update tracking variables
loadedPostIds.push(article.id);
lastLoadedPostId = article.id;
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;
// Execute any inline scripts in the new content (for ads)
const newArticle = desktopContainer.querySelector(`article[data-article-id=”${article.id}”]`);
if (newArticle) {
const scripts = newArticle.querySelectorAll(‘script’);
scripts.forEach(script => {
const newScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
if (script.src) {
newScript.src = script.src;
} else {
newScript.textContent = script.textContent;
}
document.body.appendChild(newScript);
});
}
// Trigger Ad Inserter if available
if (typeof ai_check_and_insert_block === ‘function’) {
ai_check_and_insert_block();
}
// Trigger Google Publisher Tag refresh if available
if (typeof googletag !== ‘undefined’ && googletag.pubads) {
googletag.cmd.push(function() {
googletag.pubads().refresh();
});
}
} else if (data.success && !data.has_more) {
hasMore = false;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
} else if (!data.success) {
console.error(‘AJAX error:’, data.error);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
}
})
.catch(error => {
console.error(‘Fetch error:’, error);
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
});
}
// Set up IntersectionObserver
const observer = new IntersectionObserver(function(entries) {
if (entries[0].isIntersecting) {
loadMoreArticles();
}
}, { threshold: 0.1 });
observer.observe(loadingTrigger);
})();
© Decentral Media and Crypto Briefing® 2026.
Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/jameson-lopp-self-custody-is-essential-to-avoid-third-party-risks-phishing-attacks-are-the-biggest-threat-and-a-three-wallet-system-can-enhance-security-bankless/
